Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI
JM2C
Is that what you call it. 2 cents?
I don't even bother to read your stuff anymore. You'd think he had done something serious the way you go on and on and on. Plenty of players beat women, kill people and injure on purpose. But you don't get worked up about that.
I am all broken up. ( and obviously you do or you wouldn't have commented )
I am not going on and on. I am simply posting in an active thread and responding when people address me directly( or indirectly like Jaraxle has been doing with the insults ).
Yes, I do think Brady did something serious. Very serious actually. He cheated, lied about it, destroyed evidence to cover it up, and so forth. That is serious. AGAIN if he had just admitted it at the outset this would have been a blip on the screen and then already long forgotten. Not what happened though now is it.
Who says I don't get worked up when players beat women, kill, or injure on purpose? Totally untrue. For instance. IMO, the players and coaches of the Saints that were involved in "Bounty Gate" should have all been banned for life. Not suspended or fined; banned for life. What about the thread I started about the high school football players who attacked the ref? I was outraged over that. DT Suh who played in Detroit and is now in Miami is a dirty rotten SOB and tries to hurt other players all the time. That guy should have been suspended for a year+ already long ago or even banned if he continued on after the suspension(s).
If you mean how I have said that I don't believe the NFL should suspend and/or fine players for off field criminal actions I stand behind that. The NFL is not the legal system and it is not their job to hand down punishment for non league actions. Certainly the teams can and most likely should cut the player and other teams should not sign them but the league should not be punishing players unless they did something league related.
The NFL had NO business fining and/or suspending Hardy, Peterson, Rice( especially here as the wife shares a lot of the blame for that incident ), etc... over their off field violent episodes. Saying that does not mean I am not upset by or outraged over violence by players( or anyone else )though and is an unjustified and out of line comment by you. It just means I want the legal system to handle the punishment not the NFL. The NFL's recourse is for teams to cut the player period IMO.
I love how you always put words into other people's mouths.
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI
JM2C
Is that what you call it. 2 cents?
I don't even bother to read your stuff anymore. You'd think he had done something serious the way you go on and on and on. Plenty of players beat women, kill people and injure on purpose. But you don't get worked up about that.
I am all broken up. ( and obviously you do or you wouldn't have commented )
I am not going on and on. I am simply posting in an active thread and responding when people address me directly( or indirectly like Jaraxle has been doing with the insults ).
Yes, I do think Brady did something serious. Very serious actually. He cheated, lied about it, destroyed evidence to cover it up, and so forth. That is serious. AGAIN if he had just admitted it at the outset this would have been a blip on the screen and then already long forgotten. Not what happened though now is it.
Who says I don't get worked up when players beat women, kill, or injure on purpose? Totally untrue. For instance. IMO, the players and coaches of the Saints that were involved in "Bounty Gate" should have all been banned for life. Not suspended or fined; banned for life. What about the thread I started about the high school football players who attacked the ref? I was outraged over that. DT Suh who played in Detroit and is now in Miami is a dirty rotten SOB and tries to hurt other players all the time. That guy should have been suspended for a year+ already long ago or even banned if he continued on after the suspension(s).
If you mean how I have said that I don't believe the NFL should suspend and/or fine players for off field criminal actions I stand behind that. The NFL is not the legal system and it is not their job to hand down punishment for non league actions. Certainly the teams can and most likely should cut the player and other teams should not sign them but the league should not be punishing players unless they did something league related.
The NFL had NO business fining and/or suspending Hardy, Peterson, Rice( especially here as the wife shares a lot of the blame for that incident ), etc... over their off field violent episodes. Saying that does not mean I am not upset by or outraged over violence by players( or anyone else )though and is an unjustified and out of line comment by you. It just means I want the legal system to handle the punishment not the NFL. The NFL's recourse is for teams to cut the player period IMO.
I love how you always put words into other people's mouths.
