Fluid Film seems to get a lot of love on BITOG, so I'm sure that a lot of people will share their experiences.
When it comes to protecting a vehicle's underbody, the product that's
really intended for this is undercoat. I've mentioned before that I recently inspected a 1999 Saturn SL1 that had no underbody rust whatsoever due to its decades-old layer of undercoat. The owner didn't even remember ever having it undercoated, so she was either losing her memory or she got payment packed
Either way, she wasn't getting the yearly re-application that places like Ziebart recommend.
Maybe you've heard of the 1st-gen Ford Escapes that had the rear shock tower problems? I've never had an undercoated one that rusted around that problem area. The front floor pan rust on Nissan Altimas is very well-known. The undercoated ones are fine, though. In fact, come to think of it,
I've never once looked underneath a car and seen rust nestled in among undercoat.
Now, people are understandably wary of most of what they hear in the F&I office, so they throw the baby out with the bath water and usually don't get the undercoat. It doesn't help that Consumer Reports seems to think that cars should only last five years:
Quote:
Rustproofing and undercoating. Don’t bother. Today’s vehicles are manufactured with good corrosion protection. In fact, Consumer Reports’ Annual Auto Surveys show that rust problems have almost vanished in modern vehicles. Standard rust-through warranties for most domestic and imported vehicles run five years or more, and many will cover you for an unlimited number of miles during the warranty period.
This makes me wary of anything that Consumer Reports says. It's kinda like when you see a story about your line of work on TV and then you wonder if
every story is that wrong.