I have been using Rotella T 15-40, and then switched to Rotella T6 full synthetic in an old motorcycle of mine. With the conventional Rotella, I had a lot of valvetrain noise....after switching to the slightly thinner T6, the engine actually got quieter, which I assume could have been the result of the T6 being more slippery...based of course on my official finger test.
My question though is more about film strength of the Rotella, which I have read to be around 70,000 psi. Rotella has great zinc and phosphorous numbers, but could those numbers be lowering the oil's ability to stick to the internals?
Now take Valvoline's VR1 oils. Both the "conventional" and synthetic versions have equally high levels of zinc and phos, but also contain moly, and both of these oils stick better in tests...with film strengths at over 101k.
Would this indicate that the Valvoline would be better suited to an old motorcycle with a noisy valvetrain....I'm betting that when I get around to changing out the Rotella, the bike will become noticeably smoother and quieter, proving that oils with a higher film strength are better in a particular engine.
What do you guys think?
My question though is more about film strength of the Rotella, which I have read to be around 70,000 psi. Rotella has great zinc and phosphorous numbers, but could those numbers be lowering the oil's ability to stick to the internals?
Now take Valvoline's VR1 oils. Both the "conventional" and synthetic versions have equally high levels of zinc and phos, but also contain moly, and both of these oils stick better in tests...with film strengths at over 101k.
Would this indicate that the Valvoline would be better suited to an old motorcycle with a noisy valvetrain....I'm betting that when I get around to changing out the Rotella, the bike will become noticeably smoother and quieter, proving that oils with a higher film strength are better in a particular engine.
What do you guys think?