Best Sports Cars of the 1980s and 1990s

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: artificialist
You mention reliability and the Mazda RX-7? Only the early non-turbo models would last.

I have heard, however, that turbocharged RX-7 models are so enjoyable to drive, that people would be willing to pay the high price to maintain and repair them. People who claim there was never an unreliable Japanese car will make excuses for the RX-7 "Because rotary."

A 300ZX Twin Turbo would be far more affordable and reliable. The MKIV Supra was a little bit better, but they are far more expensive.

15 years from now, importing more FD RX-7, MKIV Supra, and Z32 300ZX models will be easy. It may save some people a good deal of money if they are willing to live with right hand drive. I have heard that a few years after those cars stopped being sold in the USA, they got a few improvements. The MKIV Supra gained VVTi and got less lag despite using a single turbo. The Z32 300ZX had some styling upgrades, and I don't remember how many things were done to make the FD RX-7 better.

When getting an R34 in the USA is easy, I wonder how many people will be buying them and what they will cost.


RX-7 Reliability:

N/A: Pretty darn good.
13BT (FC3S, second gen): Touchy. Watch yourself, and stay on top of things, and it can go kinda far.

13B-REW (FD3S, third gen): Engineered to destroy itself. Every ancillary system on this engine is a hand-grenade with the pin pulled out. This engine was the 6.0 Powerstroke of rotary engines. If you remove or replace every part that isn't the engine itself, it could go a good distance.

Exhaust: 1900 degree EGT's with major exhaust reversion, exhaust from firewall to axle is all catalytic converters that love to go up in flames.
Turbos: Too small, and manifolds built in a "crack" house.
Cooling system: Too small, and equipped with a little tank that literally explodes.
Intercooler: Too small, high IAT's, perfect for an engine with a magma exhaust, pathetic cooling system, and tiny turbos with low efficiency.
Oil coolers: Too small, which is perfect for an engine that cools its combustion chambers through direct oil contact and marginal cooling everywhere else.

Also issues were the sheet metal made from Reynolds wrap on second gens. I'm fairly certain that the crushers crush this car by sitting on it. Electrical system? Probably a joint venture with Lucas Electronics. Interior? Follow your parents' advice when you were 4 years old: Just don't touch anything.....at all.

This is coming from the former owner of 2 Gen2's, and one Gen3.

We used to have a spreadsheet documenting the mileage of unmodified 13B-REW's. The record at the time was 92,000 miles before destruction.
 
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Originally Posted By: HerrStig
A Solara V6 with some TRD goodies. RWD...not in New England in the winter.


That's not a sports car...it's a mundane sedan.


A Solara is a 2 door vehicle; hence it's a COUPE and NOT a SEDAN, which has 4 doors.
cool.gif


I have a 2000 Solara SE V6 with the 5 speed and it's an enjoyable/spirited car to drive with the manual.... but I don't think it's a sports car in the traditional sense.
I think it's too heavy to be nimble, which I think is important for a sports car.


I drove a 2014 Mustang and didn't think that was a sports car either, too heavy and too disconnected from the driving experience (awful, IMO).
I had an 89 Mustang 5.0 that I thought was WAY more of a sports car than the newer one, even though it was slower and handled worse.
 
Originally Posted By: babyivan
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
A Solara is a 2-door sedan.

Original copy, jumbo shrimp, sexy fat chick


This reminds me of the license plates I read, they never accurately describe the seat contents.

SXICHK, HOTMAMA, MDLGRL...
 
Originally Posted By: babyivan
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
A Solara is a 2-door sedan.

Original copy, jumbo shrimp, sexy fat chick


Stupid post.
 
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Originally Posted By: babyivan
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
A Solara is a 2-door sedan.

Original copy, jumbo shrimp, sexy fat chick


Stupid post.
The internet is a "stupid post", deal with it.
 
Originally Posted By: SIXSPEED
84 to 87 Buick Grand National (GNX)


Best years for GN, 1986/87 Thanks to improved intercooling... Of course 87 had the GNX and that beats all else!
 
Originally Posted By: babyivan
Originally Posted By: SIXSPEED
84 to 87 Buick Grand National (GNX)


Best years for GN, 1986/87 Thanks to improved intercooling... Of course 87 had the GNX and that beats all else!


My #1 dream car. I always considered it an "American exotic".
 
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Originally Posted By: babyivan
Originally Posted By: SIXSPEED
84 to 87 Buick Grand National (GNX)


Best years for GN, 1986/87 Thanks to improved intercooling... Of course 87 had the GNX and that beats all else!


My #1 dream car. I always considered it an "American exotic".


my20tat.jpg

(Let my ex practice with her new at the time tattoo gun)

Anything Buick turbo does it for me! But the GN/GNX is my all-time fave as well... Black Beauty, Sinister, Evil, Darth Vader, pure 80's
20.gif
20.gif
20.gif
20.gif
20.gif
 
My wife still has her first car: 1986 Grand National.

She still gets peeved when I remark how much Buick's "turbo-6" symbol looks like the symbol Jiffy Lube uses...
 
I really like the older Celicas (Mid 80's or so), Nissan 300ZX's as well as the turbo'd Dodge Darts/ Plymouth Sundances. Not sure of these are considered sports cars though.

A friend of mind saved a Sundance from the junkyard for $300 right before the scrap steel market crashed. I kid you all not, no rust.. just a little faded paint on the roof. 110k on the OD.
 
Originally Posted By: OneEyeJack
I owned a first generation Supercharged MR2 that was a lot of fun to drive.


I had a 88 SC MR2 back then and it was indeed a ton of fun. Went rallying on a wet dirt track with it once and the car was solid mud afterward with no paint visible. Pulled a Dukes of Hazard and jumped a railroad track at 90mph putting gouge marks in the road from the front end where it landed. The car was built well so no issues other than the clutch needing replaced at 45k miles from my thrashing the car.

Once a hostile guy in a modded 50's v8 truck pulled up talking all kinds of trash about he was going to beat me up and my car wasn't scat ect ect, but we raced and I beat him by a car length then he pulled up thrilled acting like my new best friend absolutely shocked that the 4cyl car beat his v8 truck. Highest I ever got in it was 135mph because the front end got very light where it felt like it was fixing to loose control. Many good times in that ride for sure.


Originally Posted By: DoubleWasp

I know I'm going to be accused of bias, but Porsche 959 for the 80's, and 993 Turbo for the 90's.


I raced a 928 in that MR2 and won. Raced a 993 Turbo and got 1 car length ahead by the end of 2nd gear but once from 3rd on it ate me for lunch at 8 car lengths by the end of the race. Couldn't win them all but at least I enjoyed the car unlike many people in sport cars who drive like old ladies never knowing the full potential of them. So despite it not being the fastest car from my personal experience the MR2 was the best car of that time to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top