Originally Posted By: AZjeff
Originally Posted By: 440Magnum
As for Consumer Reports- it makes great bird cage liner. The fact that their surveys are completely and totally statistically invalid (self-selected population invalidates any survey, survey population splits into a modal distribution over-representing both 'happy' and 'angry' consumers) has been discussed ad-nauseum. Waste your money and go down blind rabbit trails following their advice if you want. I will not.
Please point us uneducated mouth-breathers to another source if you will, please.
OK, I never said anyone was uneducated or mouth-breathing (except maybe people who defend CR to the death in spite of its flaws).
And I'll freely tell you I *don't* have a good one-source go-to option. What CR is trying to do is a really, really difficult, if not outright impossible job- which they should just admit up front, explain the limitations of their method, etc. instead of claiming success. So instead of trusting one source, I tend to gather all sorts of sources- reviews from multiple magazines, newsgroups about particular models, and I even factor CR, JD Power, and their ilk in to a degree also, but you have to remember that CR has *often* given vehicles stellar ratings only to have to downgrade them later (though its funny that they never seem to UPgrade anything once they've decided 'its bad.') Likewise, the list of Motor Trend 'Cars of the Year' probably has more disasters in hindsight ('83 Renault Alliance, anyone?) than proven greats ('69 Roadrunner).