Originally Posted By: Astro14
Originally Posted By: Bluestream
Originally Posted By: Astro14
Completely agree Nick. But I view military and civilian airplanes differently.
A 747 full of people is a whole lot different than an attack aircraft, or even a reconnaissance aircraft.
And the SU-15 Flagon that shot down KAL 007 had to be very close to employ weapons. It didn't have much in the way of missiles. He was in visual range.
Unforgivable.
What if the civilan airliner is equipped with spy cameras as was KAL?
What evidence do you have that it was equipped with spy cameras?
Because it wasn't.
That's just tinfoil hat garbage, or Russian claims to justify a heinous mistake. And when you look at where it was shot down, it wasn't in a position to image anything. It was too far off shore.
c'mon, astro -- you know better than to be objective on bitog.you're one of only a few here that has enough sense to reserve judgement, until all the facts are in.that's why I don't get mixed up in these soon-to-be -political-drama threads.
it's too bad that 'prone has been banned, yet again.this thread could use his words of wisdom.
so much for only women being drama queens.
but, the drama threads are funny/entertaining.so, i'll put on my tinfoil hat, sit back, and enjoy.