Originally Posted By: Al
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: VNTS
He played [censored] good last night, proving once again he is the best QB in the NFL.
I beg to differ...Aaron Rodgers is far better...and he's not a cheater...
Hardly..too many factors to consider, the defensive line, schedule. Brady has the best percentage but that doesn't say he is better. Also consider which throws the better longer or shorter ball. Also who is the best game strategist? But to say Rogerss is "far better"...lol...no.
Also I would have to say that Gisele is better looking then Aaron's girl. Then again maybe he will trade up...lol.
If you simply put the 2 QB's in a vacuum and compared skill sets/physical abilities it would be clear Rogers would be better than Brady. He is a much better pure passer/QB. Heck, Bledsoe would beat out Brady in such a test.
It doesn't take into account what happens on the field however. It doesn't take into account the other players on the field with the QB. It doesn't take into account the skill of the coaching staff or the system the QB has to play in. It doesn't take into account pure luck either. Brady seems to have the golden touch luck wise while Rogers has been burned by things beyond his control.
Brady has benefited greatly over his career from stellar defenses and kickers. He is where is he is at through his own hard work and play( and cheating too
)for sure but he has benefited from things other QB's who may be better players didn't benefit from and thus don't have the accomplishments Brady does. Football is a team sport not an individual one. He has gained all the praise and credit for SB wins when in reality the defense and kickers deserve that praise and credit. Not to say he played bad or anything just that he wouldn't have 4 SB rings without the D and kicker in 01/03/04 or the D in 14. He wouldn't have even made it to the SB in those early years without the D and kicker.
Brady is also one of the luckiest QB's I have ever seen. Balls always bounce his way, he gets the overwhelming majority of calls in key situations( it was a fumble - tuck rule my butt ), and he has also benefited from mistakes made by the other team as well( Carolina ties game in 04 SB with a minute left and their stupid kicker kicks the ball out of bounds giving Brady extra yds and allowing a FG to win ).
Again, it isn't that Brady isn't a good QB. He is. One of the best to play for sure. He has got where he is though with a lot of help. When it has been on him and him alone though how many rings does he have? ZERO! When he had great defenses and a great kicker how many rings does he have? 4. He had one of the best offenses ever in 2007 but couldn't bring it home because the D was subpar. Funny how they get blamed for that SB loss but they don't get credit for 01/03/04/14 when it was the D and/or kicker who won those SB games - Brady does.
What about giving Adam Vinatieri(sp? )credit for 01 with his 50 yd FG to win or the D credit for the two INT's including one for a TD? What about giving Rodney Harrison credit for intercepting McNabb at the end in 03 stopping a winning TD( hmmm - sounds a lot like 2014 when Brown nabs an INT stopping a winning TD for Seattle doesn't it )? In 3 of his 4 SB wins Brady was NOT the key even though he keeps winning MVP. Heck, the Carolina kicker in 04 deserves the MVP for the Patriots for that awful kick off after his team had JUST tied the Patriot's up with a minute to go letting them go the short field for the winning FG.
For sure Brady doesn't even get to his 1st SB in 01 without the kicker making that amazing kick in the snow and the Ref's blowing the tuck rule call on the FUMBLE in the Oakland game let alone win the SB that year. Heck, if Bledsoe hadn't come off the bench against Pittsburgh in the AFC Championship to win it he wouldn't have got to the SB either in 01. Then there is the amazing D he was blessed to have early on and again in 2014 too. His playoff record went down the tubes in the middle of his career when the D was bad. Coincidence? I think not.
Just saying. QB's get too much credit for wins these days and not enough blame for losses.
So if I am starting a team from scratch and I have the option to choose Brady or Rogers in his prime, and all I have to go on is the skills set and physical abilities I would take Rogers in a heart beat.