Why haven't manufacturer's extended older oci's?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Benito
... So I wonder why manufacturers don't retrospectively increase ocis on older vehicles.

Thoughts?

Because once the car is out of warranty, they could care less. Only time they care is when the govt makes them for a safety issue/recall. There is no money to be made by anyone by doing it, so why bother?

You also have to look at engine tolerances, newer engines are much better (not all, but most are) than the older ones, plus if you tell someone that has a vehicle that uses a qt of oil every 1000 miles they can now go 7500 miles between changes, they will run out of oil because most never check their oil anymore, they just change it. For them, a 3000 mile oil change is what they need (and deserve).
 
I'm still trying to figure out what happened with the 7500 mile OCIs using conventional SF motor oils in the 1980s. How did that pan out, and why don't we see that anymore?
 
There are plenty of engines that have been maintained on MUCH longer OCIs with no varnish. Member Bill_In_Utah often posted clean engine shots- and he regularly went 5, 6, 7k plus on various conventional oils.

Besides who cares? A little varnish doesn't stop your engine from going 200K plus miles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top