Used minivan opinions?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks for the feedback akela.

Does anyone know if all Freestars had transmission issues or just a few years? I know a recall came out on the 04-06 years for torque converter issues, other than that I haven't been able to find much info/review wise.

I spoke to the wife and looked at a 07 Chrysler T/C with her this weekend. She seemed to like it and I think that is the route I will pursue. She doesn't like the looks of the Uplander and the Sienna is pretty expensive for a higher mileage example. Even though Honda has super stellar reliability ratings, I've actually had issues with every Honda product I've purchased (from cars to lawn mowers) so I am going to steer clear of the Odyssey.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Huie83
I spoke to the wife and looked at a 07 Chrysler T/C with her this weekend. She seemed to like it and I think that is the route I will pursue.


Wait.... what? I thought that Chrysler products weren't....

(Just teasing you...)
 
Originally Posted By: mrsilv04
Originally Posted By: Huie83
I spoke to the wife and looked at a 07 Chrysler T/C with her this weekend. She seemed to like it and I think that is the route I will pursue.


Wait.... what? I thought that Chrysler products weren't....

(Just teasing you...)


Hah! Funny how after searching for a few weeks and seeing what is out there in that price range changes your mind...

Also, the T/C isn't very photogenic. All the reviews online make it look/sound cheap. Once you actually see one first hand, it's pretty nice. Things like hard plastic door panels etc don't bother me. Easier to clean when the dog drools all over them or the kids get sticky stuff everywhere.

I guess one follow up question I have is about the transmission reliability in these with the 3.8 engine if half maintained? I say half because most of the vans already have 80+K miles on them and are overdue in my book for a fluid swap.
 
Visit your local transmission repair shops. Sometimes people will sell their T&C van to the transmission shop because they are fed up with it. A transmission guy will rebuild the transmission and repair other needs, such as the A/C.

As for engine choice, avoid the 3.8. They all burn oil, even when properly cared for.
 
Originally Posted By: artificialist
Visit your local transmission repair shops. Sometimes people will sell their T&C van to the transmission shop because they are fed up with it. A transmission guy will rebuild the transmission and repair other needs, such as the A/C.

As for engine choice, avoid the 3.8. They all burn oil, even when properly cared for.


That's interesting, I didn't know the 3.8 was a oil burner. I do tow a small 14' hunting boat during duck hunting season. Would the 3.3 be able to handle that? I know they put the 3.3 in the T/C base models or the Grand Caravan, I could track one of those down...
 
OK, I had a 2007 T&C with the 3.8.

Yes, it used oil. Around a quart over 5,000 miles. There are new engines that do a *lot* worse than that.

I never touched the transmission on mine. Didn't do a thing. Never had a problem.

It was in the shop once unexpectedly, for an EGR valve. Other than that, it was a battery, brake pads and rotors, tires... the usual stuff.
 
That's good to hear. I have been reading online and the T/C's 3.8 didn't seem to have near as many issues as the Wrangler. I think I'll chance it and stick with the 3.8. I check my oil at least once a month anyways so we should be OK.
 
I owned four Chryco vans...a 1988 Caravan (4 cyl.), a 1989 Voyager (3.0L w/3 spd. auto), a 1991 Voyager (3.3L w/4 spd. auto) and a 1997 GC (3.8L with a 4 spd. auto). I had the most problems with the 1991 (exhaust system, front end and...of course...a trans replacement). Granted, these were all used and I sold most of them with little over 100k miles. My favorite was the '97 GC...couldn't beat the ride and comfort (bought it from a friend w/99K miles...drove it to 126K...still on the original trans.). There is something about the "original" and I know a lot of people who have bought nothing else over the years.

Around here most of the 2001-07 Chrysler vans are exhibiting varying degrees of rust on the rear rockers/doors. My understanding is that Chrysler injected foam between the panels for sound deadening...which traps moisture/salt and causes premature rust. I'd avoid one for that reason because there's no way to prevent the problem. If you're in a southern/western state with no road salt that may not be an issue.
 
Originally Posted By: 440Magnum

You know, I rarely take issue with other people on forums, but I've been reading this categorical nonsense from you for a couple of years now and I've finally had enough to quote Red Foreman...

You (or at least your BITOG persona) are a du***ss.

LOL. Thanks for the laugh. Plenty of evidence from all sources that track long term dependability (not blind Mopar Fanboys like yourself) that state FCA vehicles are the bottom of the barrel. Its one thing for one place to say it but when they all say pretty much the same thing you tend to believe them.

So, yes a Mopar with 100k+ is like pi$$ing money away. Statistically you are more likely to have a money pit than just about any other vehicle. Sorry that upsets you but those are the facts.
 
Last edited:
[.
[/quote]
So, yes a Mopar with 100k+ is like pi$$ing money away. Statistically you are more likely to have a money pit than just about any other vehicle. Sorry that upsets you but those are the facts. [/quote]

Thank you for the input but I don't agree 100%. I'm not sure how I feel about the whole idea of buying vehicles off of data and statistics. It may work for some but it certainly hasn't for me. I feel that certain brands will have high customer loyalty and they may not report the most accurate data.

For example, I have owned 4 Honda products, 3 vehicles and 1 lawnmower. I based these purchase decisions off of consumer reports and or stats I found online. The stats said something to the effect of "you won't have issues with this vehicle/equipment, its bullet proof". Yet, I had more issues with the Honda products than my Dodge vehicles and cheap-o store brand lawn mowers that got [censored] reviews online. I'll never spend the premium on Honda branded equipment again, its too hyped up due to the brainwashed cult following they have for some reason.

Its very hard to go off of stats and user reviews because most people are so biased because a friend of a friend of a friend had a transmission go out on his 4 year old Dodge with only 80K miles on it. What they failed to mention is their teenage son was driving it to school and back and redlined it from stop sign to stop sign burning up the trans....

Anyways, buying used vehicles is a gamble. That's why I turn to this forum, to get honest actual user reviews and weed through the [censored] online.

Thanks again for everyone's input, its highly appreciated, keep it coming.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Sorry that upsets you but that is just my extremely biased opinion.


Fixed that for you ace IT guy.
 
Originally Posted By: Huie83
Thanks for the feedback akela.

Does anyone know if all Freestars had transmission issues or just a few years? I know a recall came out on the 04-06 years for torque converter issues, other than that I haven't been able to find much info/review wise.


The old 4spd AX4N used in the 2001+ Windstars and then Freestar were no more problematic than any other minivan trans, especially if you kept on on ATF changes. Our 2001 Windstar was a really good vehicle for us. It wouldn't have been if I didn't swap the (nasty) ATF and PSF out at ~36Kmi when we got the van.
 
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Sorry that upsets you but that is just my extremely biased opinion.


Fixed that for you ace IT guy.


Plenty of places that track long term dependability put FCA vehicles at the bottom of the barrel reliability wise for years now. Not biased when they all say the same things. Contrary to what Mopar Fanboys say.
 
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Sorry that upsets you but that is just my extremely biased opinion.


Fixed that for you ace IT guy.


Plenty of places that track long term dependability put FCA vehicles at the bottom of the barrel reliability wise for years now. Not biased when they all say the same things. Contrary to what Mopar Fanboys say.


And plenty of FCA vehicles out there running quite well today in spite of contrarian opinions.
 
Those are a little newer than I normally look at the market for so I may not be as much help, but i'd maybe expand your options.
smile.gif
Anecdotes from my own research files...


If you go Honda be darn sure it doesn't have that miserable 5 speed that was in the 2003up honda accord - or if it does have it make sure it was already replaced. You'll spend $3500 for the [censored] thing and they die around 110-160k. Hondas tend to be very reliable enginewise and generally EXCEPT for that one transmission which was a lemon. I'm not even sure if it was fully fixed in 2004-5, possibly improved but not fixed. PS you'll overpay because of the honda reputation.

Toyotas have a reliability reputation for a reason - if the honda has the dreaded accord 5 speed, i'd pick the toyota over the honda anyday. PS you'll overpay because of the toyota reputation.

The hyundai as a brand only is potentially a good buy - for years the korean made stuff wasn't as good, then by the 2000's they pretty much are as good as anything but the reputation still hasn't caught up. Id consider buying a late 90's or 2000ish hyundai or kia and pocket the savings without much gripe, but nothing earlier. But i haven't done specific model research on anything including their minivan though - I was going to go domestic when next buying.

I don't know enough about the newer ford or chevy minivans but i'm a bigger fan of the older GM FWD ones back in the 90's which honestly will get you the same mileage and be cheaper to fix. Surprisingly few improvements were made from the 90's to the 2000's IMHO. 90-93 were the dustbuster years that nobody likes except me, 94-96 they shortened the nose, 96 had probably the best case 3.4V6 engine with 180hp and rated 17city/24highway (when corrected for modern numbers which actually seem to rate a little low) - that's pretty competitive NOW and with a cheap to replace 4spd transmission if it ever goes who routinely go over 200k without complaint. Also light enough the 180hp feels faster than it is. Part of the efficiency reason is the 0.30 coefficient of drag too - that beats every minivan made since INCLUDING hondas and toyotas. My own shopping list if I were looking again is for a 96 Lumina APV or equivalent - i'd take that over anything offered 97 to 2006 personally. The plastic fantastic sides mean it wont rust at least in the fender areas and you wont ever get parking lot type minor dents too! Find a super cherry one with lower than average miles and pay a little more which will still be less than newer stuff.

Dodges couldnt make a good automatic transmission if their lives depended on it - every single 4spd auto from the late 80's into somewhere in the 2000's was utter garbage. (now glad I only got the 3 speed in my 87) I forget exactly when they finally got better... or maybe they haven't. Maybe if someone had a brand new transmission in it i'd get a dodge - if I planned to get rid of it 4 years later. Terrible shame too because as minivan-functionality goes they are practically king of the hill. (i'd considered getting a newer dodge and swapping in a 5 speed stick for instance, that'd be a keeper)
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Huie83
I'll never spend the premium on Honda branded equipment again, its too hyped up due to the brainwashed cult following they have for some reason.



As someone who has often been critical of Honda (and had owned an Acura as basis, not just spouting data as a fanboy/basher), but who now owns two, Ill say this...

I think most know that Honda is the largest engine manufacturer in the world. At least they were at one point and its a data point that sticks in my head. Regardless, I feel they do make a great engine. Did in our Integra, and hopefully do in our odyssey and accord.

Honda, like any manufacturer in a non-precision industry, will have some duds. This will and actually must happen mathematically. The "statistics" that get spouted out become less and less meaningful because of electronics and stuff like cellphone integration, where often "statistically" a service call because of bluetooth linking is counted the same as one for a massive engine failure. What is more important to me is selection of materials, paints, corrosion protection, components, etc. that will last the long run.

For us, we have had great success with long-term ownership, well past the 100k mark and often past the 200k mark with Chrysler, Toyota, BMW and MB products. I had no doubt that our Saab and VW would have done so as well (have experience from a close friend with VW, even through their "dark ages"), had we not traded. As someone said above, a lot of it has to do with factors that are often not admitted (driving skill/quality, who is touching the car, etc).

Though Ive often criticized Honda, and will be the first to say that they aren't just a bad deal, but a stupid deal in the secondary market, they were a maker who offered what we wanted, how we wanted (other than MT which is unobtainium in either type vehicle we bought), and we have been happy. Time will tell if the issues we had with the integra manifest with these, but as someone who has, and does own, and who has, and will be critical, Im not sure Id write them off as blatantly over hyped. Though I also would never consider a used one...

Originally Posted By: Huie83

Anyways, buying used vehicles is a gamble. That's why I turn to this forum, to get honest actual user reviews and weed through the [censored] online.

Thanks again for everyone's input, its highly appreciated, keep it coming.


If I was looking for a used van, the only one Id consider is the Chrysler product. Toyota and Honda are overpriced, the older Kia/Hyundai offerings were way behind while the newest ones push the envelope too much without offering economy of fuel or cost, and the Nissan honestly I just didn't like much.

We were tied in if we would buy an odyssey or a town and country. Keep in mind I learned to drive in and absolutely loved our Toyota Previa, which went way, way over 200k with no real service needs except a new radiator. But the Sienna didn't set up the way I wanted it, and didn't offer the value proposition of the Odyssey. The odyssey and T&C/caravan are class best IMO, having driven a TON of rental T&Cs for thousands of miles, and now being an owner of the odyssey who test drove all of them. The thing that made us pick the odyssey was twofold: right place right time for a killer deal, and the center overhead console in the chrysler vans, which while not a deal breaker, was not desired by either of us, especially my wife.

So if the ody is a bad deal used, which Ill say it is (we bought new for less cost per mile assuming it is kept to 100k, than any used deal we could find), and the chrysler is top in class, then look at chrysler.

And heres what Id do: avoid the T&C, which has a highish sticker new and doesn't depreciate as much. Look for low level Caravan and wait for a good one. Find one that had one of those value packages, which means that it might have been bought for near, if not below, $20k. Then start depreciating from there and you start to find a decent late model van for not a lot of money.

But be patient. That is key. I think the caravan base, late model, even if a little over your stated budget, is the best bet. Learn its weak points and address them, keep after it, treat it nice and gently, and Im sure it will give very good service.
 
Originally Posted By: itguy08

I'd stick with the Toyota or Hyundai/Kia units. Especially if you can find a Huyndai/Kia with some of the powertrain warranty left. We had some of the GM units in our company fleet. Uninspiring but seemed to be reliable, especially the Uplander.


For 2nd owners the Hyundai/Kia warranty is only 5 yrs/60,000 miles. Just FYI.
 
My van has been fantastic

sure it burns more oil than I'd like it to (thanks 3.8) but I have 2 toyotas with small sumps so I'm never wanting for extra oil to feed the thing
 
How about a VW minivan, aren't they just rebadged Chrysler's? Are there any mechanical differences between the VW and the Chrysler's? I have seen a number of the VW minivans for sale at reasonable prices...anything to look out for?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top