Naked Engine ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR


What happen to the beautiful craft engine valve cover for you to look at when you open the hood?


Consumers want toasters, not "machines."
frown.gif


The SRT Challengers still get a mostly bare engine- the actual intake manifold is visible and the valve covers are intended to look like old Mopar aluminum valve covers, but they're actually molded plastic snap-on pieces:

3CDBE320-93CC-4916-B192-918376334DD1_zpshp3utrew.jpg


The V6 Grand Cherokee has a more completely solid engine cover:

13612E5D-4F20-4D0F-8F7F-20363CC4F16F_zpstjnnv45w.jpg


The 5.7 Challengers and Chargers also have a barren, generic cover, and a lot of owners just leave it off. or even use it as a canvas for custom art:

ART-02.jpg


But given the wonderful machinery hiding under the Cad CTS-V's cover, it seems like the biggest crime of all to me:

112_0803_04z%2B2009_cadillac_cts_v%2Bengine_bay.jpg


And of course there's the Hellcat- no cover but the supercharger/intercooler almost looks like a cover. I do like the vintage Hemi Orange painted valve covers,though:

2015-dodge-challenger-srt-hellcat-engine-02.jpg
 
The covers vary by model too.

My 2007 Accord EX V6 has a small engine cover but the comparable Acura (a TL probably) on Youtube videos with a similar or identical engine has much more of the engine and the engine bay covered. With Acuras you have to take off more and bigger panels to get at anything.

The cynic in me says there has to be some justification for the extra cost.
 
I think it's mostly cosmetic, to achieve a certain look. Honda leaves its V-6s open the masses on some of their passenger cars. The Accord and TL both show off their beautiful polished magnesium intake manifolds:

honda-accord-engine.jpg


In contrast, for example, the same engine in a Pilot:

77677896.jpg
 
Beautiful crafted engines without cover pictures below. Ferrari engines are mostly never have any cover, Honda 4-cyl engines are mostly have no cover either.

Cover is mostly for cosmetic, to hid ugly engine, it serves no functional purpose.


2014-ferrari-f12-berlinetta-engine.jpg



epcp_1012_09_o+hamann_ferrari_california+engine_bay.jpg



387310989_e759ca8cb3_z.jpg
 
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Originally Posted By: A_Harman
DI injectors are very noisy.


BMW calls my cover an "acoustic cover" and if you drive with it removed you can notice the difference even with "normal" injectors.

Sometimes there are covers that aren't covers:

Rolls-Royce-Phantom-Black-engine-lg.jpg



5.jpg


A proper British V8.
 
Last edited:
amg_05.jpg


Pagani does engine porn the best, I love those Carbotanium air boxes, and that air plenium that takes more hours to machine than a fleet of Civics to produce.

4652747147_17795a1b5f.jpg

This is where older cars are better, nothing looks as sexy as a stack of Weber carbs on a Ferrari V12.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Eddie
I pulled the cover off of my SkyActiv engine and was surprised to not see a beautiful Aluminum engine but, a black conglomeration of hoses, wires and "stuff" I put the cover back on and decided it looked better that way. Ed


And that's exactly why they cover that "conglomeration" up. Prospective buyers equate complexity with unreliability. When they see that engine cover, the engine magically transforms itself into a reliable engine.
 
all of you need to see my sucks cover on my car. no sponge or something that could muffle the engine sound. it doesn't cover all engine even half of engine. next service i am gonna remove it. so embarrassing.


20150807_063002edit_zpsunpqczdl.jpg
 
Originally Posted By: berniedd
Engine covers are nice to look at, but I remove them on my cars. They obstruct my view when I'm doing the daily inspection of the engine before and after a run.

Wow. I usually do monthly under-the-hood inspection, once in a while weekly. Daily is a little too much.
 
Last edited:
A friend of mine got a BMW X3, and when we took the engine cover off I was a little surprised that there was a really heavy, thick, formed foam pad under it to quiet DI injector noise. The top of the engine has a ton of stuff all over it between the fuel lines, electrical lines to the coils, and various other outcroppings, and this thick foam pad was perfectly molded to it all, as though it was put on hot and pliable and cooled in place.

Most functional engine cover I've seen yet.
 
Engine noise is music to the gear heads. Want quiet get an electric car. When I had a flat bottom lake boat the sound of the propeller on the bottom of the boat and the throbbing pulses of 500 ci of big block power at 7,500 RPM along with the scream of the v drive and the ringing of the headers,the tunnel ram and the valve train screaming to go faster, go faster and sound of the water on the bottom of the hull and the wind noise when breaking 100mph is so stimulating, even glorious,,, nothing better.
 
Originally Posted By: CT8
Engine noise is music to the gear heads. Want quiet get an electric car. When I had a flat bottom lake boat the sound of the propeller on the bottom of the boat and the throbbing pulses of 500 ci of big block power at 7,500 RPM along with the scream of the v drive and the ringing of the headers,the tunnel ram and the valve train screaming to go faster, go faster and sound of the water on the bottom of the hull and the wind noise when breaking 100mph is so stimulating, even glorious,,, nothing better.

When I drive my S2000 on highway at speed of 75-85 MPH the engine speed is around 3700-4300 RPM, the engine sound from under the hood is so stimulating.

I truly hate engine cover, I like to look at the beautiful crafted intake runner.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top