Electro-magnetic pulse

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: friendly_jack
think of infinite large reflector or infinite large array antenna.


Infinity is a concept mathematicians use. It doesn't exist.
 
Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Originally Posted By: friendly_jack
think of infinite large reflector or infinite large array antenna.


Infinity is a concept mathematicians use. It doesn't exist.


OK, a blanket of sky some hundreds of KM square is closer to infinite WRT to effects on an object on the ground than a point source, isn't it ?

(Considering you can bring teflon frypans to a crankshaft discussion).
 
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Originally Posted By: friendly_jack
think of infinite large reflector or infinite large array antenna.


Infinity is a concept mathematicians use. It doesn't exist.


OK, a blanket of sky some hundreds of KM square is closer to infinite WRT to effects on an object on the ground than a point source, isn't it ?

(Considering you can bring teflon frypans to a crankshaft discussion).


You could approximate it as a point. Its not going to radiate straight down. The 10x10 km or mile or whatever is very small compared to the size of the earth. The radiation is going to go in all directions.

And you commented earlier about an aurora on the other side of the earth. Really?

The old myth was that the bomb would set the atmosphere on fire and burn the whole earth in one single reaction? You believe that?

Another theory is the largest particle accelerator on earth will create a mini black hole that will bounce around and consume the whole earth. You believe that one?
 
Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Originally Posted By: friendly_jack
think of infinite large reflector or infinite large array antenna.


Infinity is a concept mathematicians use. It doesn't exist.


OK, a blanket of sky some hundreds of KM square is closer to infinite WRT to effects on an object on the ground than a point source, isn't it ?

(Considering you can bring teflon frypans to a crankshaft discussion).


You could approximate it as a point. Its not going to radiate straight down. The 10x10 km or mile or whatever is very small compared to the size of the earth. The radiation is going to go in all directions.

And you commented earlier about an aurora on the other side of the earth. Really?


Really !!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Fishbowl

We get Short Wave Radio signals down here, over the horizon and all..just how powerful ARE those transmitters with inverse square and all of that ?

(or are they reflecting off the ionosphere or something ?)

Originally Posted By: turtlevette
The old myth was that the bomb would set the atmosphere on fire and burn the whole earth in one single reaction? You believe that?

Another theory is the largest particle accelerator on earth will create a mini black hole that will bounce around and consume the whole earth. You believe that one?


What has another (pair) of your strawmen got to do with you being wrong on this particular topic ?
 
Believe what you want. That Wikipedia article looks like brouhaha to me.

Quit posting [censored] links and back your assertions yourself.

Yes or no. A 10x10 mile area can be approximated as a point when comparing it to the size of the earth.

And I don't see it as a wrong or right thing. I believe you are grossly over estimating the power of this device. I'm probably underestimating it. I'd like to have good debates with you. Build the case yourself. Wiki links. Well, clevy can do that.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: KrisZ
But wouldn't the EMP signal be subject to the inverse square law once it entered the atmosphere? I think it would and hence that 40km region would essentially act as an insulator, diminishing the strength of the electro-magnetic field each meter it passed through the air.

There are two problems with that. We, standing here, are still in the magnetic field, which passes right through the Earth, and we're talking flux here, so the field is everything. Secondly, the air might be an insulator with respect to electricity, but not to magnetism.

Originally Posted By: KrisZ
Don't get me wrong, I do think that there would be an effect of such an event, our electrical grid probably being the major concern here, but I'm having a hard time believing that we would essentially go back to the industrial revolution age, with everything electrical/electronic being wiped out.

"Everything" would be a hyperbole, yes. The effects are really hard to predict. As I mentioned before, some stuff that "should have" survived tests back in the day did not, and others that were not expected to did. And, for obvious reasons, this isn't something that can actually be experimented with right now and enough data is still classified, with respect to a good deal of test numbers.

Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Infinity is a concept mathematicians use. It doesn't exist.

Friendly_jacek's point, at least how I read it, would be more correct if it were referring to the ionosphere as a Gaussian surface rather than something infinite. As for infinity, there is still one real, potential example. If space is flat and unbounded, it is infinite. Aside from that, it certainly is only a mathematical concept, but an extremely important one.

Originally Posted By: turtlevette
You could approximate it as a point. Its not going to radiate straight down. The 10x10 km or mile or whatever is very small compared to the size of the earth. The radiation is going to go in all directions.

The Tempest reference I provided before gives the geometry of the pulse effects on Earth, with the bulk of it in a cone shape from the point source. It gives the simplified equations, too.

Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Another theory is the largest particle accelerator on earth will create a mini black hole that will bounce around and consume the whole earth. You believe that one?

Few physicists or mathematicians believed that. That wasn't a theory, but a hypothesis, and one that certainly hasn't been corroborated to this date.

Shannow: Yep, that bouncing off the ionosphere does wonders!

Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Quit posting [censored] links and back your assertions yourself.

How can he do that? All he can really do is work with the math as provided and data through tests already done, and there are links for that. If Shannow does have a nuclear device in his possession and the ability to launch it into the ionosphere and detonate it and conduct tests thereafter, I'm sure he'd get into loads of trouble for doing so.

intel-simpsons-rocket.jpg


Instead of the Eiffel Tower, he'd launch with the Parliament Haus der Austr[al]ia in the background.
 
Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Believe what you want. That Wikipedia article looks like brouhaha to me.

Quit posting [censored] links and back your assertions yourself.


Per garak's proferring, I can only use the data from the people who did the test, and recorded the information.

"imagining" a point source, and refuting everything else because you are limited by your imagination and training (and have admitted that you finished your training complete, no updates necessary)

This is a link from one of the other links that you dismissed, a NASA one

http://www.futurescience.com/emp/Hess-Wilmot.pdf

Got particle motion in the ionosphere, it's got radioative decay releasing particles over time.

Resonance effects mess with many things mechanical and electrical, far beyond their perceived effort.

The series of experiments made artificial radiation belts that fried satellite's solar cells, even those launched days afterwards.

Historical documents, and extremely interesting.

https://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/docs1/00322994.pdf
 
I don't pretend to understand the EMP physics, but a while back I read about the effects of the Starfish Prime nuclear test back in the early '80s. Really interesting stuff. The detonation was southwest of Johnston Island, but streetlights and telephone circuits were knocked out in Hawaii which is ~1,000 miles away. I guess those effects were due to EMP. But what was really interesting to me was the delayed effects of high energy electrons in the Van Allen belts. I work at a NASA center on a weather satellite program. The first Telstar comm satellite was launched a day or two after the Starfish test, and the bird only worked for a few months because of increased radiation in the Van Allen belts due to the nuke test. I believe the high radiation also killed one of the Injun research satellites, from either frying the transistors or the solar panels. Interesting stuff.
 
Yep, that E3 effect is interesting, and that E3 effect is amplified with a large fusion device, versus E1 doing plenty enough damage with a small, thin walled fission device.
 
Originally Posted By: hattaresguy
The 616/17 are not terrible cold blooded if they are in good shape they will start without glow plugs.

The later 603/6 series are pigs when cold, needs the glow plugs.

In an emergency you could shoot some either into the intake and roll it down a hill, it will start.


This is why many people prefer to have a Dodge Ram 12V engine. They use a grid heater instead of glow plugs, and they start quickly even if the grid heater becomes a problem.

Another alternative I have heard is what VW enthusiasts call an "m-TDI." They take a TDI engine with a Bosch VE pump, and replace certain VE-pump parts with mechanically injected VW engines. It is popular with people who restore Vanagons that originally had a 1.6D engine. I'm not sure how they made the VNT function without electronics, many people would simply use a wastegate turbo.
 
Originally Posted By: artificialist
Originally Posted By: hattaresguy
The 616/17 are not terrible cold blooded if they are in good shape they will start without glow plugs.

The later 603/6 series are pigs when cold, needs the glow plugs.

In an emergency you could shoot some either into the intake and roll it down a hill, it will start.


This is why many people prefer to have a Dodge Ram 12V engine. They use a grid heater instead of glow plugs, and they start quickly even if the grid heater becomes a problem.

Another alternative I have heard is what VW enthusiasts call an "m-TDI." They take a TDI engine with a Bosch VE pump, and replace certain VE-pump parts with mechanically injected VW engines. It is popular with people who restore Vanagons that originally had a 1.6D engine. I'm not sure how they made the VNT function without electronics, many people would simply use a wastegate turbo.


you can use a boost operated controller like used on a wastegate on a VNT aswell. I had a car that came like that from the factory, And I replaced the turbo on it with a bigger one after I converted it to boost controlled (it came as vacuum controlled)
 
Originally Posted By: Joel_MD
I don't pretend to understand the EMP physics, but a while back I read about the effects of the Starfish Prime nuclear test back in the early '80s. Really interesting stuff. The detonation was southwest of Johnston Island, but streetlights and telephone circuits were knocked out in Hawaii which is ~1,000 miles away. I guess those effects were due to EMP. But what was really interesting to me was the delayed effects of high energy electrons in the Van Allen belts. I work at a NASA center on a weather satellite program. The first Telstar comm satellite was launched a day or two after the Starfish test, and the bird only worked for a few months because of increased radiation in the Van Allen belts due to the nuke test. I believe the high radiation also killed one of the Injun research satellites, from either frying the transistors or the solar panels. Interesting stuff.
The first Telstars were launched long before the 80s.
 
Originally Posted By: artificialist
Originally Posted By: hattaresguy
The 616/17 are not terrible cold blooded if they are in good shape they will start without glow plugs.

The later 603/6 series are pigs when cold, needs the glow plugs.

In an emergency you could shoot some either into the intake and roll it down a hill, it will start.


This is why many people prefer to have a Dodge Ram 12V engine. They use a grid heater instead of glow plugs, and they start quickly even if the grid heater becomes a problem.

Another alternative I have heard is what VW enthusiasts call an "m-TDI." They take a TDI engine with a Bosch VE pump, and replace certain VE-pump parts with mechanically injected VW engines. It is popular with people who restore Vanagons that originally had a 1.6D engine. I'm not sure how they made the VNT function without electronics, many people would simply use a wastegate turbo.


Most off road diesels don't have any heaters, but cross flow pre chamber heads need them. Cummins don't if its warm. The Cummins in my boat starts fine with no heater down to as cold as I want to go boating!

Cross flow heads for whatever reason get cranky if they are not glowed, but they also rev very high for a diesel. Trade off in design I guess.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top