Originally Posted By: turtlevette
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
You converting it to roller or staying flat tappet? Hydraulic or solid?
Roller retrofits are crazy expensive and less reliable. There might not even be one for a Caddy. The area you gain under the curve is not worth it. If he just wanted to go fast, a Caddy is not the choice, nor is a 5500 pound car.
But darn cool...
I'd argue the less reliable part
But yes, they are expensive, though certainly not what I'd call "crazy expensive". I've been involved in two retrofit builds, one was an SBF in an '85 Mustang, the other was in an S10 with a built SBC. The cost was about the same for both of them, the expense being the link-bar lifters and the more expensive camshaft. Both were hydraulic roller conversions.
I like roller retrofits because the camshaft lifespan is essentially increased to indefinite barring a roller failure, which, in my experience, is something quite rare. It also eliminates the "OMG, I need 40 billion PPM of ZDDP or my camshaft will eat itself" concern that some seem to have
Howard makes roller conversion link-bar lifters for this application:
http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/hrs-91462/overview/make/cadillac
At $429 they aren't badly priced.
The catch is you need to buy either a custom grind or the same brand of camshaft (as Howards seems to be the only one who makes roller stuff for this engine):
http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/hrs-520055-12/overview/make/cadillac
http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/hrs-521125-10/overview/make/cadillac
http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/hrs-522105-10/overview/make/cadillac
Which is $490.00, so you are basically $1K into just the cam and lifters, vs 1/3rd that for a hydraulic flat tappet. Depending on the cost of the total build, this may or may not be significant