Originally Posted By: billt460
Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd
In many marriages, but certainly not all, there is no "my". It's "our".
Guns are not considered marital property.
Re-read the bit to which I was replying. I didn't say that guns are marital property. The topic was finances -- money. xxch4osxx said he didn't understand the concept of both parties agreeing to a purchase because he buys things with his own money, and his girlfriend does the same. My reply was in that context, the context of money. Many couples in marriage pool their money so that there is no more "his" or "hers", but "ours".
Obviously, if you have a permitted or regulated item like a firearm, there can be only one owner of record.
Originally Posted By: billt460
Where the money came from to buy it is immaterial.
That was the context of my reply. To some couples, where the money comes from is very material.
Let me be clear again. My post was not about dual ownership of a firearm -- it was about dual "ownership" (or not) of personal finances.
To the OP, I haven't personally shot one of these, but I'd love to. It looks like an excellent firearm, and I don't think I've seen a negative review of it. One of the most unique things about it, besides the modular construction, is that it uses a solid trigger and striker-fired action on the same firearm. This isn't common -- nearly every striker-fired action handgun that I'm aware of uses some form of active trigger safety (jointed trigger or trigger shoe tang). It's interesting to me that the P320 does not.