Originally Posted By: gaijinnv
Originally Posted By: SirTanon
Originally Posted By: Brybo86
99 @
.3
vs
99.9 @
3
?
id go with the
[email protected]
Actually, going from 99% to 99.9% is statistically significant, to a whole order of magnitude. It may not seem like much at first glance, but it's significant.
If you have 1,000,000 particles (in that .3 range) entering the airbox, the 99% filter grabs 990,000 of them and lets 10,000 of them through.
The 99.9% filter grabs 999,000 of them, on the other hand, leaving only 1000 to pass through. That's 1/10th as many. Which do you think is better?
I think you overlooked the fact that the 99% rating is at 0.3 and the 99.9% rating is at 3.0 ...
... shows what happens when I'm tired and read too quick.. I guess it's easy to overlook that leading .
I stand corrected. 99% @ .3 is definitely good enough.