Originally Posted By: MolaKule
One suggestion: Don't quote technical papers unless you have read and studied them.
Uh huh...Can't do that, I'm afraid. I do a lot of proof-reading and peer-review work, some of it ghost-written. If I restricted myself to critiquing stuff I was actually qualified in, I wouldn't work much. However, generally I find a little logic goes a long way.
That said, if y'all want to limit the discussion to qualified commentators (which I obviously aint, I'm an ex-biologist, ex-network engineer, ex-patriate pretend English teacher), then fair enough, I'll get me coat.
As a parting shot, I'll just say that I don't think your statement "spiders don't fly" is accurate, but I suppose it depends on how you define flight.
Gorham (2013) http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.4731v1.pdf
One suggestion: Don't quote technical papers unless you have read and studied them.
Uh huh...Can't do that, I'm afraid. I do a lot of proof-reading and peer-review work, some of it ghost-written. If I restricted myself to critiquing stuff I was actually qualified in, I wouldn't work much. However, generally I find a little logic goes a long way.
That said, if y'all want to limit the discussion to qualified commentators (which I obviously aint, I'm an ex-biologist, ex-network engineer, ex-patriate pretend English teacher), then fair enough, I'll get me coat.
As a parting shot, I'll just say that I don't think your statement "spiders don't fly" is accurate, but I suppose it depends on how you define flight.
Gorham (2013) http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.4731v1.pdf