I've been meaning to post the first two UOAs from my '13 Golf R. The first ones details are, as far as I know, correct. The seond one is definitely correct. This car is set up with an APR Stage III kit with runner flaps deleted and an additional low pressure fuel system upgrade. This setup is supposed to be good for ~450hp at the crank.
Code:
MI/HR on Oil 4555 6348
MI/HR on Unit 15145 10590
Sample Date 03/29/15 11/24/14
Make Up Oil Added 0qt 0qt
ALUMINUM 5 4
CHROMIUM 1 1
IRON 50 52
COPPER 4 8
LEAD 0 0
TIN 0 0
MOLYBDENUM 5 26
NICKEL 1 1
MANGANESE 2 2
SILVER 0 0
TITANIUM 0 0
POTASSIUM 2 1
BORON 38 47
SILICON 6 11
SODIUM 4 4
CALCIUM 1727 2550
MAGNESIUM 17 23
PHOSPHORUS 663 845
ZINC 802 988
BARIUM 0 0
SUS Viscosity @ 210° 57.8 60.5
cSt Viscosity @ 100° 9.58 10.36
Flashpoint in °F 340 325
Fuel % 1.8 2.5
Antifreeze % 0 0
Water % 0 0
Insolubles % 0.3 0.3
TBN 3.4
Blackstone comments on first interval:
Universal averages show typical wear metals for the 2.0L turbo FSI engine after ~5,900 miles of oil use. This oil saw 6,348 miles of use, and metals are okay. Maybe the slightly high iron is just due to the big turbo, or maybe it's from the usage this engine sees. At least some of it is related to the longer-than-average oil run and some might be lingering wear-in. Note that the viscosity was low for a 5W/30, and fuel was calculated at a possible problematic 2.5%, based on the updated oil brand/viscosity information.
Blackstone comments on second interval:
We made a few changes to your previous report, given the information you provided here. With the oil brand/viscosity identified, we had to recalculate fuel, so it measured 2.5%. But not to worry -- fuel dilution improved here to just 1.8%, so it doesn't look like you have any ongoing fuel system problems to worry about. Iron is a little worse than last time when you look at it on a ppm/mile basis. That's worth watching as trends keep building. Aside from that, though, this report is pretty good. The TBN is strong at 3.4. Try this oil use interval again next time.
This car is running Motul X-Max 0w40 now. Hopefully it'll stay in grade a bit better. Seeing that last interval sheer down to nearly a 20wt is a bit scary.
--Matt
Code:
MI/HR on Oil 4555 6348
MI/HR on Unit 15145 10590
Sample Date 03/29/15 11/24/14
Make Up Oil Added 0qt 0qt
ALUMINUM 5 4
CHROMIUM 1 1
IRON 50 52
COPPER 4 8
LEAD 0 0
TIN 0 0
MOLYBDENUM 5 26
NICKEL 1 1
MANGANESE 2 2
SILVER 0 0
TITANIUM 0 0
POTASSIUM 2 1
BORON 38 47
SILICON 6 11
SODIUM 4 4
CALCIUM 1727 2550
MAGNESIUM 17 23
PHOSPHORUS 663 845
ZINC 802 988
BARIUM 0 0
SUS Viscosity @ 210° 57.8 60.5
cSt Viscosity @ 100° 9.58 10.36
Flashpoint in °F 340 325
Fuel % 1.8 2.5
Antifreeze % 0 0
Water % 0 0
Insolubles % 0.3 0.3
TBN 3.4
Blackstone comments on first interval:
Universal averages show typical wear metals for the 2.0L turbo FSI engine after ~5,900 miles of oil use. This oil saw 6,348 miles of use, and metals are okay. Maybe the slightly high iron is just due to the big turbo, or maybe it's from the usage this engine sees. At least some of it is related to the longer-than-average oil run and some might be lingering wear-in. Note that the viscosity was low for a 5W/30, and fuel was calculated at a possible problematic 2.5%, based on the updated oil brand/viscosity information.
Blackstone comments on second interval:
We made a few changes to your previous report, given the information you provided here. With the oil brand/viscosity identified, we had to recalculate fuel, so it measured 2.5%. But not to worry -- fuel dilution improved here to just 1.8%, so it doesn't look like you have any ongoing fuel system problems to worry about. Iron is a little worse than last time when you look at it on a ppm/mile basis. That's worth watching as trends keep building. Aside from that, though, this report is pretty good. The TBN is strong at 3.4. Try this oil use interval again next time.
This car is running Motul X-Max 0w40 now. Hopefully it'll stay in grade a bit better. Seeing that last interval sheer down to nearly a 20wt is a bit scary.
--Matt
Last edited: