Originally Posted By: used_0il
The additive package looks like automotive SN for SAE 40 and above,
with phosphorous at 911 and zinc at 1083.
An old school CI-4 plus, or CH/SM 15W40 such as Delo 400 will have an
additive package that is 40% higher, and wet clutch compatible.
Has anyone thought of using Caterpillar TO-4+ oils in motorcycles?
They are basically friction modified engine oils with very tough
qualification standards.
You have to remember, Delo is a 15/40, the UOA above is 20/50. Also by "Old School" you cant buy CI-4 oils anymore. Not in Delo. I used the Delo once back in 2013, as far as WET Clutch it made me a little nervous, my clutch didnt slip but it felt almost to smooth Compared to the nice bite of the Valvoline MC oil.
Here is the Delo UOA, interesting the Column on the right is the Valvoline MC 20/50 I loved the way the bike shifted with the Valvoline, not that the Delo was bad. Myabe felt more notchy, still, if it was a 20/50 would try it again.
I also dont believe we can look at the VERY small tested and listed components of these oils and make a decision on which one will be better at wear. There is a lot more going on in these oils, then what a very limited lab test reveals.
Here is the Delo 15/40 LE400 UOA compared to the Valvoline MC 20/50
The Valvoline 20/50 did much better at wear considering the short run of the Delo but in all fairness, the Delo was used as my "winter oil" limited riding in colder weather. Again kind of irrelevant testing 2 oils in two different situations but the Valvoline oils I think are a bargain compared to WAY more expensive boutique oils (except Amsoil which excels) showing far worse wear numbers. Except for Amsoil, which I never used, I dont believe in those other "boutiques" but doesnt matter, we use what works for us and makes us feel good.