Originally Posted By: zach1900
I've noticed that the Camry in my sig. has the most powerful (fan) and coldest a/c out of all the cars I've had and have ridden in, on a 95 degree summer day I can get the car cooled down to mid 70's in a matter of minutes where as the Dakota takes much longer and seems to suffer under 30 MPH, the side windows do seem pretty thick in the Camry compared to other cars I have had, are they possibly laminated/insulated better? just curious what mechanism makes the a/c so effective.
Does the Dakota use a clutch fan, or an electric one? That may be the reason low speed A/C is less effective than in your Toyota. The Toyota you have would use an electric fan.
Not all MOPAR A/C systems are bad, but most cars in my family had colder A/C than Mom's 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. At least that system was reliable, The '85 Maxima and 1999 Honda CRV required compressor replacement more than once. Every Maxima and several CRVs at that time did.
VW A/C systems were annoying to me. The compressors usually last 6 to 8 years, and when you flushed out the system, you would use far more flush solvent than in other cars.
I hear talk about German cars having weak A/C due to short summers over there. That never made sense to me, because they made engines and transmissions that were built for scorching heat. Also, Sweden doesn't have long summers, but their A/C systems are good. Most Volvos I saw had A/C systems similar to those by General Motors.
One of my dad's best cars was a 1979 Toyota Corrola. He said that back then, he could add refrigerant DIY, and use the sight glass to determine if the system is full. He had to do that once a year, but it kept the car cool during the long summers in Houston, Texas.