Originally Posted By: CBR.worm
It is a data point for most people. I wouldn't buy a car with 300k. I would be leery of buying a car with 120k unless I knew the history of the car. Most people do not want to buy a car and then do major work. I am equally scared of a ten year old car with 6k. I guess for me, age is more crucial than miles, but miles are important.
In my mind, if a transmission has been replaced or major engine or suspension work has been done before I get the vehicle, I will always be suspicious of that work. Much like I would prefer OE paint, I prefer OE everything.
Personally, I prefer to maintain my cars myself, purchasing new or with low miles and then sell around ~200k +/-50K before major repairs are required. If a car looks like it will need more than routine maintenance, I'll let the next guy deal with it. I will also tell the next guy exactly what major expense is about to be required.
I don't want to ever get to the 'nickel and dime' period. I certainly don't want to buy in the middle of it.
Excellent post, we are in almost complete agreement.
Here we often sell vehicles well before they are worthless or in bad shape. Some buyers are actually suspicious of our vehicles because we maintain them extremely well and they tend to be very straight and clean, with absolutely everything functioning well, yet fairly high miles.
As stated above, miles are just one of many indicators. I'll take a high mileage one if I want to and can verify its history...