Originally Posted By: typ901
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
I dont get the complaints. Cars have more interior volume pound for pound, then they used to, and are quieter, smoother, and more efficient to boot.
All of that means tighter packaging, more compact outer shells compared to the innards, etc.
Im sure that some would love to drive a model T or a 59 chevy to and from work each day, but I suspect that after a few weeks, this would get old, despite their simplicity and relative ease of maintenance...
The point for the headlight bulb replacement is that it is a safety issue to drive with one bulb, and also you can be ticketed for it. My 07' MB E350 is a tough one to get to the bulbs also. It takes time-and you need to figure out which way to bend your arms. My '01 MB E320 took 5 minutes of a leisurely pace. Granted the car was redesigned, but safety related items should be easy to fix(replace) Halogen bulbs are a consumable.
Yeah but engineering is always about balancing tradeoffs.
Your car is an interesting case, if we look at specs:
For example:
2001 E320 has 95 cu ft passenger space and 15 cu ft of cargo space. It weighs 3624 lb and is 189.4".
2007 E350 has 97 cu ft passenger space and 14 cu ft of cargo space. it weighs 3740 lb and is 191".
So from the surface, one would think that 2 cu ft of cargo space was surely made by lengthening, adding weight and cutting the trunk...
legroom:
2007: 41.9/35.6"
2001: 41.3/36.1
So they are roughly the same, but the thing that has changed is that the newer car is longer, has a bit more passenger space, and likely much better aerodynamics. So it looks to me as if the issue is primarily the way that the car's aerodynamics are manipulated, and what encroaches into the engine space.