Originally Posted By: nighamreuki
Originally Posted By: m6pwr
Bravo! Thanks so much for posting - - and having the courage to take your bimmer all the way to the "insane" oem recommended oci.
I'm bookmarking your uoa and am going to have it bronzed so I can post it on all the forthcoming threads on various BMW forums that foretell of the horrible deaths that will surely follow for all who dare to do BMW's recommended oci.
easy there tiger, just b/c this sample was good doesn't mean you have to celebrate especially with 70% highway. maybe this car never sees 4K RPMs or short trips.
look at my results and tell me if you would want to run longer. for most people 15K interval is damaging to the engine, but saves BMW tons of money. Thats why we have oil analysis to see how engine is wearing under specific conditions so we could behave accordingly.
By the same token, just because your engine is showing more wear than you like, doesn't mean all BMW engines do.
You say that for most people 15k intervals are damaging to engines, but there isn't any proof to support that statement. You showed a less than optimal report, I have one that shows that the 15k/ 1 year oil change is fine in my car. Anecdotally, I haven't heard of any engines grenading due to following BMW's recommended OCI.
Furthermore there is a major difference between your engine and mine. Mine is the twin turbocharged variety, while yours is the NA variety. Conventional wisdom would say that my oil is under more stress than the oil in your engine. And for informations sake, my car sees > 4k RPM on a daily basis. Just yesterday I bounced it off the limiter in first and second thanks to a kindly gentleman in a C230 in the lane next to me that got under my skin.
But ultimately, its up to each owner to decide what to do, and a UOI is important tool in that regards. On one fact we do agree, making blanket statements on a single report isn't wise.