Well that makes sense to me now. I had a totally different experience, but if I had a similar one I would likely feel inclined to bypass blizzack multicell type winter tires.
Originally Posted By: sciphi
The difference in grip between the multicell compound and the regular compound was drastic. Having the car perform drastically differently is (and was in my case) enough to result in a nasty crash. Having that "flip of a switch" reduction in performance when the fronts were worn through but the rears were not is not something I'd wish upon anybody.
The non-multicell winter tires I've experienced since, such as the Hakka R's, Altimax Arctics or Blizzak LM-25's, have shown much more predictability in performance as they have worn since they're similar compound throughout.
Originally Posted By: sciphi
The difference in grip between the multicell compound and the regular compound was drastic. Having the car perform drastically differently is (and was in my case) enough to result in a nasty crash. Having that "flip of a switch" reduction in performance when the fronts were worn through but the rears were not is not something I'd wish upon anybody.
The non-multicell winter tires I've experienced since, such as the Hakka R's, Altimax Arctics or Blizzak LM-25's, have shown much more predictability in performance as they have worn since they're similar compound throughout.