Originally Posted By: CATERHAM
+3
The low single digit spec' was so impressive that members didn't didn't need any further encouragement they wanted that "unicorn". Reminding members that Noack really wasn't that important simply meant you were a party pooper.
It was so impressive that we have deduced that GTL base stocks were being used. That's where I get excited. You, oddly enough, also agree that we have been able to extrapolate the use of GTL from the volatility values. So not only are you being a hypocrite, but you're alao a diehard hypocrite- with this talk of unicorns, trying to insult others' while you own univorns, namely VI and TEOST 33C test results as misappropriated to a completely unrelated engine part- the intake valves.
Now, I suggest you, and all you've erroneously convinced, that you all review the TEOST 33C procedure, review the conditions that an intake valve experiences, and draw analogies between the two.
PROTIP: intake valves are not washed under a laminar flow of full-composition motor oil--- any other analogy you can think, cannot compensate for that one massive glaring FLAW.
In fact, I think I'll make a thread about how TEOST 33C is a misappropriated analogy to DI intake valve deposits.