Recent Topics
Gun Belt Wanted
by FirstNissan
56 minutes 38 seconds ago
car wash soap for pressure washer
by Donald
Today at 08:16 PM
Deep tranny pan worth it?
by rsylvstr
Today at 07:20 PM
Which oil for my old BMW and why?
by fdcg27
Today at 06:20 PM
Synthetic blend for a Elantra
by car51
Today at 05:48 PM
Camshaft Adjuster Bolts - Replacement ?
by Ndx
Today at 05:45 PM
STP Synthetic
by travlnman
Today at 04:37 PM
Myliftstand alternative jack stand
by momo
Today at 03:33 PM
Kmart sale on Smitty's oil and ATF
by slacktide_bitog
Today at 02:53 PM
Napa master pack oil filter price
by Electromotive
Today at 02:39 PM
Local Big Lots still has Valvoline next gen 10w30
by Electromotive
Today at 01:25 PM
Best Value Differential Oil 75W-90
by KevinP
Today at 01:02 PM
Newest Members
Ruturaj, derfderfgoose, ssnead, mtrev, redtacoma
58277 Registered Users
Who's Online
98 registered (2015_PSD, 901Memphis, 55hambone, 04SE, 2cool, 14 invisible), 1694 Guests and 12 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58277 Members
66 Forums
250847 Topics
4111581 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#3453871 - 08/12/14 06:49 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: JHZR2]
Jarlaxle Online   content


Registered: 02/02/12
Posts: 6628
Loc: New England
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: Chris142
it may be a bad cat. especially an aftermarked cat


Agreed. My 318i doesnt even have EGR. Failed NOx once, replaced it with a Magnaflow, barely passed. Replaced it with an OEM one, and passed with flying colors...

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/915639

ONLY EVER BUY OEM if you plan on doing anything besides dumping the car.

I learned that at my own expense. The aftermarket cat was barely good enough to improve numbers compared to my OE cat which was not converting NOX. New OE, NOx was at 7. All the other measured items had substantial improvements percentage wise but nowhere near the swing in number values.


My Cherokee passed two tests with a cheap part-store cat (Walker, I think) without a problem. And note: the OP's car PASSED twice with the aftermarket cat in place.
_________________________
1979 Coupe de Ville, 542 stroker, 15W-40 Super Tech, Delco
2011 Crown Vic P71, 5W-20 Valvoline NextGen, Purolator
2012 Suzuki AN400A, 10W-40 ST, Delco

Top
#3453878 - 08/12/14 06:53 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: Bluestream]
Merkava_4 Online   content


Registered: 01/30/07
Posts: 14306
Loc: Clovis, CA
Originally Posted By: Bluestream
Higher than normal NOX emissions may be caused by:
-an overheated engine
-Lean air/fuel mixtures
-Vacuum leaks
-over advanced ignition timing
-Defective EGR system


How does the EGR cause a lean condition; is it caused by the EGR valve being stuck open, or closed?

Top
#3453882 - 08/12/14 06:55 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: InvalidUserID]
Chris142 Offline


Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 13888
Loc: apple valley, ca
part of the smog test is a test of the egr. if the smog guy did his job and did the state mandated test and passed the egr then the egr system should be fine.
_________________________
02 Wrangler super-s 10w30
87 F250 delo 15w40
04 Tahoe super-s 5w30
Z400 Lucas 10w30
KLR250 Maxima 10w40
Can am maveric delo 5w40

Top
#3453889 - 08/12/14 07:00 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: Chris142]
InvalidUserID Offline


Registered: 08/23/04
Posts: 714
Loc: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted By: Chris142
part of the smog test is a test of the egr. if the smog guy did his job and did the state mandated test and passed the egr then the egr system should be fine.


I looked through my past smog tests, they all only show "VISUAL EGR" as a PASS and an N/A to "FUNCTIONAL EGR". It looks like they just check to make sure it's physically there.
_________________________
My Cars aka old reliables:
- '96 Camaro 3800 II
- '97 4.0 Grand Cherokee
- '99 Civic EX


Top
#3453956 - 08/12/14 08:01 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: Merkava_4]
Gokhan Offline


Registered: 12/29/10
Posts: 2269
Loc: Los Angeles, California
Originally Posted By: Merkava_4
Originally Posted By: Bluestream
Higher than normal NOX emissions may be caused by:
-an overheated engine
-Lean air/fuel mixtures
-Vacuum leaks
-over advanced ignition timing
-Defective EGR system

How does the EGR cause a lean condition; is it caused by the EGR valve being stuck open, or closed?

EGR valve doesn't cause lean conditions. It decreases the combustion temperature by recirculating the exhaust gas into the combustion chamber. Decreasing the combustion temperature decreases the NO_x formation, as high combustion temperatures increase the NO_x formation.

Lean conditions (excess oxygen), unrelated to EGR but related to vacuum leaks or fuel-system or emission-component (such as O_2 feedback system) problems, also increase the NO_x, as NO_x is formed by oxygen reacting with nitrogen.

OP might have a carbon-blocked EGR valve or some fuel- or emission-system problems as I mentioned. I had a fully carbon-blocked EGR valve once. The stuff was really, really hard, but I was able to fully clean it with a flat screwdriver (used as a pick) and brake-cleaner solvent.
_________________________
1985 Toyota Corolla LE, 4A-LC engine, ~ 264,000 M
Mobil 1 (M1) 0W-40 SN synthetic
Toyota 90915-YZZF2 filter, 90430-12031 drain gasket

Top
#3453977 - 08/12/14 08:22 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: InvalidUserID]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 8089
Loc: Florida
OBDII cars are supposed to measure EGR flow, show a check engine light, and set a code.

Unfortunately, the system isn't perfect.

The 3800 has a steel tube between an exhaust manifold and the EGR valve. It can easily crack, so feel for gas leaks from that steel tube. Often when you replace the intake gaskets, it disturbs the EGR tube.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3454501 - 08/13/14 01:43 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: Jarlaxle]
JHZR2 Offline



Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 38097
Loc: New Jersey
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: Chris142
it may be a bad cat. especially an aftermarked cat


Agreed. My 318i doesnt even have EGR. Failed NOx once, replaced it with a Magnaflow, barely passed. Replaced it with an OEM one, and passed with flying colors...

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/915639

ONLY EVER BUY OEM if you plan on doing anything besides dumping the car.

I learned that at my own expense. The aftermarket cat was barely good enough to improve numbers compared to my OE cat which was not converting NOX. New OE, NOx was at 7. All the other measured items had substantial improvements percentage wise but nowhere near the swing in number values.


My Cherokee passed two tests with a cheap part-store cat (Walker, I think) without a problem. And note: the OP's car PASSED twice with the aftermarket cat in place.


Wonderful. Dyno tests or just idle sniffers? Make sure youre talking apples to apples and posting numbers before drawing conclusions. My car passed with one of these too. Two years later, not so much. OE converter immediately took it from thousands to single digits, simple as that.

Top
#3454728 - 08/13/14 06:16 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: Jarlaxle]
Kruse Offline


Registered: 10/05/05
Posts: 3693
Loc: Kansas
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle

My Cherokee passed two tests with a cheap part-store cat (Walker, I think) without a problem. And note: the OP's car PASSED twice with the aftermarket cat in place.


There are several brands of "cheapie" cats that cannot be installed in several states, for good reasons. A browse through the RockAuto site shows which ones are not for sale in these states. While it is true they may initially pass the test, they usually fail early. Unless it's a beater, a cheap cat can be a waste of money.

Top
#3454743 - 08/13/14 06:36 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: JHZR2]
Jarlaxle Online   content


Registered: 02/02/12
Posts: 6628
Loc: New England
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: Chris142
it may be a bad cat. especially an aftermarked cat


Agreed. My 318i doesnt even have EGR. Failed NOx once, replaced it with a Magnaflow, barely passed. Replaced it with an OEM one, and passed with flying colors...

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/915639

ONLY EVER BUY OEM if you plan on doing anything besides dumping the car.

I learned that at my own expense. The aftermarket cat was barely good enough to improve numbers compared to my OE cat which was not converting NOX. New OE, NOx was at 7. All the other measured items had substantial improvements percentage wise but nowhere near the swing in number values.


My Cherokee passed two tests with a cheap part-store cat (Walker, I think) without a problem. And note: the OP's car PASSED twice with the aftermarket cat in place.


Wonderful. Dyno tests or just idle sniffers? Make sure youre talking apples to apples and posting numbers before drawing conclusions. My car passed with one of these too. Two years later, not so much. OE converter immediately took it from thousands to single digits, simple as that.


IM-240 roller test (tougher than the OP's 2-speed test), passed easily both times. About 65,000 on the cat the second time. Considering the one I had lists for about $100 and an OE cat could run $500+ (if it hasn't gone NS1), it's probably cheaper to use the cheap one even if I DID have to replace it every 2 years.

My Caddy has over 100K on its catalysts...passed its last emission test (also IM-240) last year, about 10% the allowable emissions. (Not bad for 542ci and 3x the factory power...)
_________________________
1979 Coupe de Ville, 542 stroker, 15W-40 Super Tech, Delco
2011 Crown Vic P71, 5W-20 Valvoline NextGen, Purolator
2012 Suzuki AN400A, 10W-40 ST, Delco

Top
#3454746 - 08/13/14 06:38 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: Kruse]
Jarlaxle Online   content


Registered: 02/02/12
Posts: 6628
Loc: New England
Originally Posted By: Kruse
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle

My Cherokee passed two tests with a cheap part-store cat (Walker, I think) without a problem. And note: the OP's car PASSED twice with the aftermarket cat in place.


There are several brands of "cheapie" cats that cannot be installed in several states, for good reasons. A browse through the RockAuto site shows which ones are not for sale in these states. While it is true they may initially pass the test, they usually fail early. Unless it's a beater, a cheap cat can be a waste of money.


Yes: the manufacturer did not jump through the hoops and spend the money to satisfy CARB, no more & no less. I am very happy I do not have to deal with that idiocy. No, I am NOT choking my Caddy with a dreadful pellet converter to satisfy a bureaucrat!
_________________________
1979 Coupe de Ville, 542 stroker, 15W-40 Super Tech, Delco
2011 Crown Vic P71, 5W-20 Valvoline NextGen, Purolator
2012 Suzuki AN400A, 10W-40 ST, Delco

Top
#3454989 - 08/14/14 07:13 AM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: Jarlaxle]
Kruse Offline


Registered: 10/05/05
Posts: 3693
Loc: Kansas
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle

No, I am NOT choking my Caddy with a dreadful pellet converter to satisfy a bureaucrat!


I guess I haven't seen a pelleted cat since since about 1980 on a GM product. I have an honest question here. Who still makes a pelleted cat?

Top
#3455183 - 08/14/14 11:20 AM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: InvalidUserID]
InvalidUserID Offline


Registered: 08/23/04
Posts: 714
Loc: Bay Area, CA
I keep hearing about cheap aftermarket cats however given that California is super strict about them, wouldn't a cat that is OBD II/CA CARB legal be considered quality?

The cat currently on now is CA-legal CARB certified/approved.
_________________________
My Cars aka old reliables:
- '96 Camaro 3800 II
- '97 4.0 Grand Cherokee
- '99 Civic EX


Top
#3455401 - 08/14/14 02:44 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: InvalidUserID]
Chris142 Offline


Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 13888
Loc: apple valley, ca
the carb approved cat flows just as well as the gofast cat. the carb one has more minerals in it so its cleaner and longer lasting
_________________________
02 Wrangler super-s 10w30
87 F250 delo 15w40
04 Tahoe super-s 5w30
Z400 Lucas 10w30
KLR250 Maxima 10w40
Can am maveric delo 5w40

Top
#3455657 - 08/14/14 06:09 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: Kruse]
Jarlaxle Online   content


Registered: 02/02/12
Posts: 6628
Loc: New England
Originally Posted By: Kruse
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle

No, I am NOT choking my Caddy with a dreadful pellet converter to satisfy a bureaucrat!


I guess I haven't seen a pelleted cat since since about 1980 on a GM product. I have an honest question here. Who still makes a pelleted cat?


I have seen them on GM trucks as late as 1995. The OE cat on my CDV would be a pellet type.
_________________________
1979 Coupe de Ville, 542 stroker, 15W-40 Super Tech, Delco
2011 Crown Vic P71, 5W-20 Valvoline NextGen, Purolator
2012 Suzuki AN400A, 10W-40 ST, Delco

Top
#3455690 - 08/14/14 06:44 PM Re: Failed CA emission - high NO [Re: InvalidUserID]
asand1 Offline


Registered: 12/16/12
Posts: 1466
Loc: Oregon coast
"High flow" cat is a misnomer. Pellet cats are a thing of the past. Buy any quality "honeycomb" replacement cat, and it will outflow any OE pellet cat PERIOD.

Quote:
The cat currently on now is CA-legal CARB certified/approved.
Only long enough for one or two tests, then it stops working. "High flow" cats are designed to pass the initial test and then burn out becoming a straight pipe.



Edited by asand1 (08/14/14 06:47 PM)
_________________________
Nissan/Infinity/Mazda Manuals
1996 Maxima 310K
1998 F250ld

Top
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >