Originally Posted By: strat81
Regarding the topic at hand, assuming 150,000 miles and $3.50 per gallon of gas:
A 30mpg vehicle will use 5,000 gallons of gasoline resulting in fuel costs of $17,500.
A 50mpg vehicle will use 3,000 gallons of gasoline resulting in fuel costs of $10,500.
(I rounded my gas price based on AAA's national average price of $3.517 today.)
Assuming $2,500 for a Dorman battery plus installation, that leaves you with $4,500 to cover any price difference between your chosen hybrid and a comparable conventional vehicle.
Now that I have provided this information, I fully expect to see people cherry-pick vehicle prices, gas prices, and vehicle mileage to grossly distort the figures the side they choose to support in this argument.
The Prius and other hybrids are compelling vehicles for people with certain transportation needs. In some cases, they can be less expensive to operate than a comparable conventional vehicle. In other cases, a comparable conventional vehicle is less expensive. It is up to the buyer to do the math.
Some people have intangibles that they place a value on: power, handling, image, technology (technophobia?), etc. It is difficult to factor those into a price analysis.
It's obvious that a hybrid or a Prius isn't for everyone, but some of the mental gymnastics in this thread are incredible.
THANK YOU! We agree fully.
I'm not afraid of the technology. In fact, I consider the Prius a high performance car. It performs wonders with a gallon of gas.
I'd like to add that the battery expense at the end of the car's life (say 200K) might not be easy to justify, when, the car probably won't be kept to 300,000 miles. Most people just don't drive cars that long.
Regarding the topic at hand, assuming 150,000 miles and $3.50 per gallon of gas:
A 30mpg vehicle will use 5,000 gallons of gasoline resulting in fuel costs of $17,500.
A 50mpg vehicle will use 3,000 gallons of gasoline resulting in fuel costs of $10,500.
(I rounded my gas price based on AAA's national average price of $3.517 today.)
Assuming $2,500 for a Dorman battery plus installation, that leaves you with $4,500 to cover any price difference between your chosen hybrid and a comparable conventional vehicle.
Now that I have provided this information, I fully expect to see people cherry-pick vehicle prices, gas prices, and vehicle mileage to grossly distort the figures the side they choose to support in this argument.
The Prius and other hybrids are compelling vehicles for people with certain transportation needs. In some cases, they can be less expensive to operate than a comparable conventional vehicle. In other cases, a comparable conventional vehicle is less expensive. It is up to the buyer to do the math.
Some people have intangibles that they place a value on: power, handling, image, technology (technophobia?), etc. It is difficult to factor those into a price analysis.
It's obvious that a hybrid or a Prius isn't for everyone, but some of the mental gymnastics in this thread are incredible.
THANK YOU! We agree fully.
I'm not afraid of the technology. In fact, I consider the Prius a high performance car. It performs wonders with a gallon of gas.
I'd like to add that the battery expense at the end of the car's life (say 200K) might not be easy to justify, when, the car probably won't be kept to 300,000 miles. Most people just don't drive cars that long.
Last edited: