Recent Topics
Who watches the oil co's?
by Camprunner
07/25/16 02:44 PM
Magnetec "Edged" out?
by ARCOgraphite
07/25/16 02:34 PM
Let's talk RUM
by car51
07/25/16 02:23 PM
Any .257 Roberts Reloaders On The Site?
by 2015_PSD
07/25/16 01:18 PM
Making tacos at home
by Reddy45
07/25/16 12:41 PM
Wiring a new garbage disposal
by Hokiefyd
07/25/16 11:38 AM
Power Steering Fluid
by DWC28
07/25/16 10:07 AM
Troy-Built 4.5hp running problem
by Kestas
07/25/16 09:26 AM
Conventional oil instead of synthetic
by corndogzombie
07/25/16 08:05 AM
kohler courage 15 issues
by tomm22
07/25/16 07:58 AM
Small overlap crash test?
by Huie83
07/25/16 07:39 AM
Top Tier Fuels and Tailpipe deposits
by virginoil
07/25/16 07:20 AM
Newest Members
Ken_Clifton, HotDog15, curiousaboutoil, 01CAMRY, corndogzombie
58589 Registered Users
Who's Online
90 registered (4WD, Alfred_B, 182RG, AIRJAC3, 87sammy, 2015_PSD, 9 invisible), 2182 Guests and 24 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58589 Members
66 Forums
252234 Topics
4136454 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3428449 - 07/18/14 12:16 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
yvon_la Offline


Registered: 05/20/14
Posts: 1269
Loc: quebec canada
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: yvon_la
(But would not meet the energy conserving limit for hths 150)

I'm not really sure what you wrote here.

In simplest terms, an oil that has an HT/HS Viscosity of 3.5 cP or higher will not meet the energy conserving requirements stipulated in ILSAC GF5 spec.

yep
_________________________
Truck driver
Nissan versa note s 2014 Mobil Delvac 1 LE 5W-30 supertech st-6607(edition 2016) castrol transynd

Top
#3428461 - 07/18/14 12:29 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13029
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: yvon_la
(But would not meet the energy conserving limit for hths 150)

I'm not really sure what you wrote here.

In simplest terms, an oil that has an HT/HS Viscosity of 3.5 cP or higher will not meet the energy conserving requirements stipulated in ILSAC GF5 spec.




There's some dubiousness about Renewable Lube around this. They claim the 0w30 is HTHS of 3.6-3.8 but also call it energy conserving. I've never gotten a clear answer out of them on this.

Then again, their basestocks and chemistry seem to be quite advanced so it's possible that the HTHS is a bit lower (3.2-3.4?) but the formula is so stout that it maintains that viscosity for a very long time.

The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40, and almost a 0w40, leads me to believe there is some very sophisticated engineering they keep secret.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
#3428487 - 07/18/14 12:54 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: dparm]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 31793
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: dparm
The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40,

If the oil meets the cold viscosity test requirements of 5w, then it should be labeled as such. Unless of course they don't claim any API/SAE J300 compliance, in which case they can call it anything they want.
_________________________
'02 530i (Edge HM 10W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T (Edge 5W-40)

Top
#3428741 - 07/18/14 08:26 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13029
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: dparm
The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40,

If the oil meets the cold viscosity test requirements of 5w, then it should be labeled as such. Unless of course they don't claim any API/SAE J300 compliance, in which case they can call it anything they want.




They label it as 15w40 for marketing purposes -- HDEO users want to see 15w40, even though the 5w40 might be superior. Bill told me this. Supposedly it's very close to being a 0w40.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2