Recent Topics
1997 Saturn P0326 No power
by nwjones18
08/29/16 04:29 PM
Can I use lower weight ?
by ST2008
08/29/16 04:25 PM
Amsoil 0W-30 Honda S2000 40,259 OCI w/bypass
by slalom44
08/29/16 03:32 PM
Holdup
by Whitewolf
08/29/16 03:14 PM
boosting diesel perf using propane/CNG/meth added
by columnshift
08/29/16 03:04 PM
HP for '96 Toyota Corolla?
by Benzadmiral
08/29/16 03:04 PM
Gene Wilder Dies at 83
by John_Conrad
08/29/16 02:52 PM
Simple oil question, Honda GCV 160
by Popsy
08/29/16 02:49 PM
BMWs Remote 3D View
by HTSS_TR
08/29/16 02:25 PM
I changed my p.s. fluid, it's easy (with pics)
by TmanP
08/29/16 02:20 PM
Abandoning the Fumoto Valve Plan
by CrackyWainwright
08/29/16 02:18 PM
New Shed/Garage, A Couple Questions
by Bob5150
08/29/16 01:08 PM
Newest Members
LazLong, gioburk, turrican, GGilbert, leje0306
58952 Registered Users
Who's Online
98 registered (2oldtommy, Al, 2015_PSD, 09_GXP, 8 invisible), 1743 Guests and 11 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58952 Members
66 Forums
253735 Topics
4165541 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3428449 - 07/18/14 12:16 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
yvon_la Offline


Registered: 05/20/14
Posts: 1269
Loc: quebec canada
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: yvon_la
(But would not meet the energy conserving limit for hths 150)

I'm not really sure what you wrote here.

In simplest terms, an oil that has an HT/HS Viscosity of 3.5 cP or higher will not meet the energy conserving requirements stipulated in ILSAC GF5 spec.

yep
_________________________
Truck driver
Nissan versa note s 2014 Mobil Delvac 1 LE 5W-30 supertech st-6607(edition 2016) castrol transynd

Top
#3428461 - 07/18/14 12:29 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13031
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: yvon_la
(But would not meet the energy conserving limit for hths 150)

I'm not really sure what you wrote here.

In simplest terms, an oil that has an HT/HS Viscosity of 3.5 cP or higher will not meet the energy conserving requirements stipulated in ILSAC GF5 spec.




There's some dubiousness about Renewable Lube around this. They claim the 0w30 is HTHS of 3.6-3.8 but also call it energy conserving. I've never gotten a clear answer out of them on this.

Then again, their basestocks and chemistry seem to be quite advanced so it's possible that the HTHS is a bit lower (3.2-3.4?) but the formula is so stout that it maintains that viscosity for a very long time.

The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40, and almost a 0w40, leads me to believe there is some very sophisticated engineering they keep secret.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
#3428487 - 07/18/14 12:54 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: dparm]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 31998
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: dparm
The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40,

If the oil meets the cold viscosity test requirements of 5w, then it should be labeled as such. Unless of course they don't claim any API/SAE J300 compliance, in which case they can call it anything they want.
_________________________
'02 530i (Edge HM 10W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T (Edge 5W-40)

Top
#3428741 - 07/18/14 08:26 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13031
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: dparm
The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40,

If the oil meets the cold viscosity test requirements of 5w, then it should be labeled as such. Unless of course they don't claim any API/SAE J300 compliance, in which case they can call it anything they want.




They label it as 15w40 for marketing purposes -- HDEO users want to see 15w40, even though the 5w40 might be superior. Bill told me this. Supposedly it's very close to being a 0w40.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2