Recent Topics
Cut Super Tech ST3980 2500miles
by jhellwig
05/29/16 12:25 AM
Smoked my first brisket today
by MrHorspwer
05/28/16 11:00 PM
Lowes charcoal sale
by Bandito440
05/28/16 10:17 PM
Jeepers Creepers! (Jeep Patriot)
by daves87rs
05/28/16 10:10 PM
Need a tire
by Leo99
05/28/16 09:58 PM
Small Engine Oil Pressure
by funflyer
05/28/16 09:06 PM
Any harm in using a Motorcraft FL910S on a Tacoma?
by jongies3
05/28/16 08:50 PM
A/C performance woes...
by SEMI_287
05/28/16 08:49 PM
Red Line 10W30 Motorcycle oil particle count
by bulwnkl
05/28/16 08:08 PM
Microgard 51334 cut open
by dlundblad
05/28/16 08:07 PM
Differential Fluid Selection..
by Warstud
05/28/16 07:13 PM
The morality of riding a bike married with kids
by fdcg27
05/28/16 07:00 PM
Newest Members
mungchimp, troutwest66, AIRJAC3, bpete65, LEVY
58001 Registered Users
Who's Online
20 registered (Duffyjr, c502cid, bbhero, Duke, 2 invisible), 459 Guests and 102 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58001 Members
66 Forums
249545 Topics
4085203 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3428449 - 07/18/14 12:16 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
yvon_la Offline


Registered: 05/20/14
Posts: 1195
Loc: quebec canada
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: yvon_la
(But would not meet the energy conserving limit for hths 150)

I'm not really sure what you wrote here.

In simplest terms, an oil that has an HT/HS Viscosity of 3.5 cP or higher will not meet the energy conserving requirements stipulated in ILSAC GF5 spec.

yep
_________________________
Truck driver
Nissan versa note s 2014 Mobil Delvac 1 LE 5W-30 supertech st-6607(edition 2016) castrol transynd

Top
#3428461 - 07/18/14 12:29 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13008
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: yvon_la
(But would not meet the energy conserving limit for hths 150)

I'm not really sure what you wrote here.

In simplest terms, an oil that has an HT/HS Viscosity of 3.5 cP or higher will not meet the energy conserving requirements stipulated in ILSAC GF5 spec.




There's some dubiousness about Renewable Lube around this. They claim the 0w30 is HTHS of 3.6-3.8 but also call it energy conserving. I've never gotten a clear answer out of them on this.

Then again, their basestocks and chemistry seem to be quite advanced so it's possible that the HTHS is a bit lower (3.2-3.4?) but the formula is so stout that it maintains that viscosity for a very long time.

The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40, and almost a 0w40, leads me to believe there is some very sophisticated engineering they keep secret.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
#3428487 - 07/18/14 12:54 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: dparm]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 31473
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: dparm
The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40,

If the oil meets the cold viscosity test requirements of 5w, then it should be labeled as such. Unless of course they don't claim any API/SAE J300 compliance, in which case they can call it anything they want.
_________________________
'02 530i (Edge HM 10W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T (Edge 5W-40)

Top
#3428741 - 07/18/14 08:26 PM Re: kv100 or/and hths100 ? [Re: Quattro Pete]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 13008
Loc: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: dparm
The fact that their 15w40 is really a 5w40,

If the oil meets the cold viscosity test requirements of 5w, then it should be labeled as such. Unless of course they don't claim any API/SAE J300 compliance, in which case they can call it anything they want.




They label it as 15w40 for marketing purposes -- HDEO users want to see 15w40, even though the 5w40 might be superior. Bill told me this. Supposedly it's very close to being a 0w40.
_________________________
2011 BMW M3 sedan ZCP

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2