Gumout GDI Q&A Answers

click here for the Gumout GDI Q&A answers

Recent Topics
Kubota L3130 - Oil Filter Bypass
by SavagePatch
41 minutes 26 seconds ago
Mobil 1 0W20 Finally at San Antonio Costco's
by LesterL
Today at 09:09 AM
Films that reflect America's essence...
by MrHorspwer
Today at 09:09 AM
Why do people think 911 is a nanny service?
by horse123
Today at 08:49 AM
3800 series II, how likely to need LIM gasket
by CBR.worm
Today at 08:13 AM
Amazon (3) 5 qt Havoline Jugs $35.31 Free Shipping
by tenderloin
Today at 08:02 AM
Ram Owners
by Red91
Today at 08:01 AM
chrysler oil spec ms-6395
by oilchangeguy
Today at 07:29 AM
345D New Holland Diesel Tractor
by Valk1500
Today at 07:23 AM
DIY write-up for 2013 Camry ATF Exchange
by windeye
Today at 07:14 AM
Diabetic Rib Rub
by Oil Changer
Today at 06:43 AM
Sodium vs Moly?
by oilchangeguy
Today at 05:59 AM
Newest Members
landy, rwarde, Hhjester, jp99, Diegs
54577 Registered Users
Who's Online
99 registered (anl0109, 97f150, AlienBug, 2009Edge, 74DartSport, AandPDan, 7 invisible), 1634 Guests and 95 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54577 Members
66 Forums
233811 Topics
3755547 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3425794 - 07/15/14 06:33 PM Duke engine......better design?
mcrn Offline


Registered: 11/30/05
Posts: 2766
Loc: FL
http://sploid.gizmodo.com/this-is-the-we...dium=socialflow

I searched and could not see that this had been previously posted.

Top
#3425852 - 07/15/14 07:22 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
sicko Offline


Registered: 09/22/08
Posts: 1585
Loc: Virginia
That first image is seriously cool to look at.


Top
#3425867 - 07/15/14 07:36 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
webfors Offline


Registered: 06/06/06
Posts: 4202
Loc: Great White North.. eh
Awesome! I would love to see this engine in production.
_________________________
15 Honda Civic, FF, OEM OF
13 Dodge GC, VWB 5w20, Purolator OF
13 Suzuki SFV650, OEM 10w40, OEM OF
All small engines; RT5 10w30

Top
#3425910 - 07/15/14 08:14 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
gregk24 Offline


Registered: 04/13/13
Posts: 3776
Loc: FL, USA
Wow, looks pretty cool. Not sure how reliable things would be though. Looks like it could have sealing issues.
_________________________
2006 Honda Accord 131K
TGMO 0w20

2005 Chevy Uplander 126K
VML SB 5w30

1992 Ford Ranger 338K
MS5K 10w30

1991 Buick Park Avenue 116K
MSHM SB 10w30

Top
#3425914 - 07/15/14 08:18 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 7021
Loc: beaver land EH?
mechanical complexity, coupled with sealing problems (just like wenkel engines), will plague this design in production mode.

Q.
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3425916 - 07/15/14 08:24 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: gregk24]
Nick1994 Online   content


Registered: 02/19/13
Posts: 3042
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted By: gregk24
Wow, looks pretty cool. Not sure how reliable things would be though. Looks like it could have sealing issues.


That's what I thought. After many years of use, things are gonna start losing their pressure, metal will fatigue and the whole engine will need replaced. Interesting concept though.
_________________________
2004 VW Beetle TDI 174k

Top
#3425949 - 07/15/14 08:46 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Win Offline


Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 3619
Loc: Arkansas
Looks like a wobble plate type of air conditioning compressor.

With spark plugs.
_________________________
09 Torrent 3.6 V6 Fram 5/30
09 Solstice 2.4 I4 Fram 5/30
08 G8 3.6 V6 M1 0/40
04 Xj8 4.2 V8 Fram 5/30
99 S-10 2.2 I4
94 Xj12 6.0 V12

Top
#3425950 - 07/15/14 08:47 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Chris142 Offline


Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 12626
Loc: apple valley, ca
very similar to many a\c compressors
_________________________
02 Wrangler durablend 10w40
87 F250 Diesel Mystic 15w50
04 Tahoe super-s 5w30
Z400 Lucas 10w30
KLR250 Maxima 10w40
Polaris Trailblazer delo 5w40

Top
#3425952 - 07/15/14 08:50 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Subdued Offline


Registered: 10/06/13
Posts: 454
Loc: Youngstown, NY
that's a technological terror if I've ever seen one
_________________________
2008 Chrysler Town & Country Touring 105k
2007 Toyota Yaris S 120k
2003 Ford Taurus SES 115k
2001 Toyota Corolla LE 150k

Top
#3425979 - 07/15/14 09:11 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: Chris142]
scurvy Offline


Registered: 02/19/07
Posts: 2303
Loc: Chicago IL USA
Originally Posted By: Win
Looks like a wobble plate type of air conditioning compressor.

Originally Posted By: Chris142
very similar to many a\c compressors


Quite right. Same design as many existing AC compressors, which work beautifully. No reason it couldn't be adapted to work with spark or compression ignition.
_________________________
You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

06 VW Golf TDI: M1 TDT 5w40, HU726/2x, EaBP90
12 Mazda 5: Amsoil SSO 0W20, FL910S

Top
#3426249 - 07/16/14 07:38 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: Win]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 12043
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
Originally Posted By: Win
Looks like a wobble plate type of air conditioning compressor.

With spark plugs.

Just did a Sanden and it looked just like this 7cyl.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3426363 - 07/16/14 10:32 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
just count the weight of the moving parts. that will tell you all you need to know.

Top
#3427006 - 07/16/14 09:39 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Ram01 Offline


Registered: 10/13/10
Posts: 728
Loc: New York Queens
Wonder what weight oil that motor takes

Top
#3427035 - 07/16/14 10:24 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Kiwi_ME Offline


Registered: 10/24/08
Posts: 884
Loc: New Zealand
I should be patriotic but I think it's a nightmare too. Oddly the animated GIF shows the block stationary while the video shows it rotating, as it needs to, to move pistons past the ports and spark plugs. Perhaps the crank turns at twice head speed for a 4-stroke cycle.
Sealing the head under combustion pressure along with the complex machining of the wobble plate and con rods make it unattractive to me. And the touted advantages of balance and part count answer questions nobody has actually asked.

Compressors use this type of idea (wobble plate with a large number of small cylinders) to avoid pressure pulses in the input/output, hardly an issue in an IC engine where small cylinders have the disadvantage of high heat loss.

Top
#3427134 - 07/17/14 04:09 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
bruno Offline


Registered: 10/08/07
Posts: 423
Loc: new Jersey
Back in the '50s this was tried .... it was called a Swash Plate design . Fine for clean conditions like AC compressors but otherwise it was a dud .

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it's worth doing .


Edited by bruno (07/17/14 04:11 AM)

Top
#3429787 - 07/20/14 12:42 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: bruno]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 7021
Loc: beaver land EH?
Originally Posted By: bruno
Back in the '50s this was tried .... it was called a Swash Plate design . Fine for clean conditions like AC compressors but otherwise it was a dud .

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it's worth doing .


+1 with what Bruno said.

Remember: unlike sealed A/C compressor, which runs in a sealed, uncontaminated environment lubricated with compressor oil, etc. (which remains uncontaminated/not deteriorated) for a long, long time; exposing to fuel and air, and dirt in air (abrasion), combustion byproducts, blowby, moisture/condensation, etc. there will be no guarantee on how long/reliable such design would be, and also the inherent energy conversion efficiency also.

Just because it looks good in theory doesn't mean it would be meaningful/practical in real-life situation.

Afterall: we have been constantly refining/improving the venerable internal reciprocating combustion engine design for a century now, it would be challenging to start from scratch to design something even better...

I know it's not 100% impossible, but it would be challenging.

Q.
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3430544 - 07/20/14 07:38 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Shannow Offline


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 29226
Loc: a prisoner island

Top
#3433464 - 07/23/14 02:30 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
A_Harman Offline


Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 5087
Loc: Michigan
Google search barrel engines and read up on their long, unsuccessful history.
_________________________
1985 Z51 Corvette track car
2002 Camaro Z28 LS1/6-speed
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 diesel
1972 GMC 1500 shortbed project truck

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >