Recent Topics
At what point to drop comp/collision insurance?
by Quattro Pete
10/30/14 09:18 AM
$10 off any $50 gas card w/ $50 purchase at Publix
by LT4 Vette
10/30/14 08:39 AM
Tire Review-AltiMAX RT43
by Char Baby
10/30/14 08:18 AM
2014 Ram 1500 3.0l VM Diesel UOA
by Shaker223
10/30/14 07:39 AM
2012 Elantra 1.8
by dlundblad
10/30/14 07:37 AM
Why The Demise of Timing Belts?
by doitmyself
10/30/14 07:00 AM
Most shootings occur after an argument...
by Shannow
10/30/14 05:54 AM
expectant couples
by dnewton3
10/30/14 05:35 AM
10/30-11/26 Advance Ad
by tenderloin
10/30/14 02:06 AM
Castrol edge in lawn mower?
by sky06
10/30/14 01:35 AM
Question about C4 Corvette Dash Readings
by tinmanSC
10/30/14 01:06 AM
SF wins world series, MVP gets new midsize truck?
by another Todd
10/30/14 12:20 AM
Newest Members
FiveOhTorx, conefree, NEVALEAK, kevmor99, macbaxter
51742 Registered Users
Who's Online
80 registered (3800Series, 1999nick, Asterix, Astro14, ARCOgraphite, 6 invisible), 1408 Guests and 155 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51742 Members
64 Forums
221403 Topics
3501261 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3429787 - 07/20/14 12:42 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: bruno]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 6426
Loc: beaver land EH?
Originally Posted By: bruno
Back in the '50s this was tried .... it was called a Swash Plate design . Fine for clean conditions like AC compressors but otherwise it was a dud .

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it's worth doing .


+1 with what Bruno said.

Remember: unlike sealed A/C compressor, which runs in a sealed, uncontaminated environment lubricated with compressor oil, etc. (which remains uncontaminated/not deteriorated) for a long, long time; exposing to fuel and air, and dirt in air (abrasion), combustion byproducts, blowby, moisture/condensation, etc. there will be no guarantee on how long/reliable such design would be, and also the inherent energy conversion efficiency also.

Just because it looks good in theory doesn't mean it would be meaningful/practical in real-life situation.

Afterall: we have been constantly refining/improving the venerable internal reciprocating combustion engine design for a century now, it would be challenging to start from scratch to design something even better...

I know it's not 100% impossible, but it would be challenging.

Q.
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3430544 - 07/20/14 07:38 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Shannow Offline


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 26867
Loc: a prison island

Top
#3433464 - 07/23/14 02:30 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
A_Harman Offline


Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 4314
Loc: Michigan
Google search barrel engines and read up on their long, unsuccessful history.
_________________________
1985 Z51 Corvette track car
2002 Camaro Z28 LS1/6-speed
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 diesel
1972 GMC 1500 shortbed project truck

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2