Recent Topics
Regal: rocker panel damaged
by Benzadmiral
18 minutes 18 seconds ago
Songs that were crimes ....
by Shannow
Today at 06:31 AM
P1's for birthday
by Camprunner
Today at 05:49 AM
Oil Temp difference
by Rojack
Today at 04:36 AM
API specs 2015 - Infineum summary
by Shannow
Today at 04:23 AM
this song's been rattling around in my head
by Rick in PA
Today at 03:59 AM
Canadian robot social experiment
by turtlevette
Today at 01:58 AM
Polaris HD 10w-50, weak sauce?
by DNVDMAX
Today at 01:39 AM
Napa 15w40 cj-4 napa brand? Good for cat Mack and
by mountainmover
Yesterday at 11:51 PM
Swifty gas station has just got a facelift?
by Vern_in_IL
Yesterday at 11:37 PM
2003 Ford F53 - High pressure power steering line.
by mrsilv04
Yesterday at 11:17 PM
Fuel Filter recommendations
by THE_TROTS
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Newest Members
VinceHimself, jirfyu, Donskjr, mccantsjr, kocoman
54913 Registered Users
Who's Online
79 registered (Benzadmiral, A_Harman, Bandito440, Bigdaddyeasy, Asterix, badtlc, 10 invisible), 1278 Guests and 78 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54913 Members
66 Forums
235326 Topics
3786088 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3429787 - 07/20/14 12:42 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: bruno]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 7062
Loc: beaver land EH?
Originally Posted By: bruno
Back in the '50s this was tried .... it was called a Swash Plate design . Fine for clean conditions like AC compressors but otherwise it was a dud .

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it's worth doing .


+1 with what Bruno said.

Remember: unlike sealed A/C compressor, which runs in a sealed, uncontaminated environment lubricated with compressor oil, etc. (which remains uncontaminated/not deteriorated) for a long, long time; exposing to fuel and air, and dirt in air (abrasion), combustion byproducts, blowby, moisture/condensation, etc. there will be no guarantee on how long/reliable such design would be, and also the inherent energy conversion efficiency also.

Just because it looks good in theory doesn't mean it would be meaningful/practical in real-life situation.

Afterall: we have been constantly refining/improving the venerable internal reciprocating combustion engine design for a century now, it would be challenging to start from scratch to design something even better...

I know it's not 100% impossible, but it would be challenging.

Q.
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3430544 - 07/20/14 07:38 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 29529
Loc: Oz

Top
#3433464 - 07/23/14 02:30 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
A_Harman Online   content


Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 5186
Loc: Michigan
Google search barrel engines and read up on their long, unsuccessful history.
_________________________
1985 Z51 Corvette track car
2002 Camaro Z28 LS1/6-speed
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 diesel
1972 GMC 1500 shortbed project truck

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2