Recent Topics
Fram TG3506 cut open 5500 miles
by jmb3675
12 minutes 19 seconds ago
Why do T6 gallons not have batch/date markings?
by mrsilv04
18 minutes 16 seconds ago
Castrol GTX Magnatec 5W-20 Motor Oil- Feel Me!
by AirgunSavant
19 minutes 46 seconds ago
Valvoline Hat Rebate 2015 and More
by anl0109
39 minutes 59 seconds ago
Cyclone Oil Separator
by Snoman002
44 minutes 10 seconds ago
OBD II bluetooth/android
by Taildragger
Today at 09:00 PM
How Hobbyists Should Buy Auto Parts -Future Sticky
by macarose
Today at 08:12 PM
Silverado converter vacuum to hydroboost brakes
by EvanD
Today at 08:09 PM
Portable air compressor?
by FirstNissan
Today at 08:00 PM
Anyone rennet when M1 15w50 came out?
by car51
Today at 07:47 PM
Mazda3 noise after rear brake/rotor install
by Blumurder
Today at 07:45 PM
Tesla motor
by OneEyeJack
Today at 07:43 PM
Newest Members
ryanm8, csammons, TOYJOETA, be3, Earl_Von_Syntec
54893 Registered Users
Who's Online
85 registered (Bandito440, andyd, AirgunSavant, asiancivicmaniac, 3800Series, 10 invisible), 1560 Guests and 92 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54893 Members
66 Forums
235147 Topics
3782888 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3425794 - 07/15/14 06:33 PM Duke engine......better design?
mcrn Offline


Registered: 11/30/05
Posts: 2774
Loc: FL
http://sploid.gizmodo.com/this-is-the-we...dium=socialflow

I searched and could not see that this had been previously posted.

Top
#3425852 - 07/15/14 07:22 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
sicko Offline


Registered: 09/22/08
Posts: 1593
Loc: Virginia
That first image is seriously cool to look at.


Top
#3425867 - 07/15/14 07:36 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
webfors Offline


Registered: 06/06/06
Posts: 4238
Loc: Great White North.. eh
Awesome! I would love to see this engine in production.
_________________________
15 Honda Civic, FF, OEM OF
13 Dodge GC, VWB 5w20, Purolator OF
13 Suzuki SFV650, OEM 10w40, OEM OF
All small engines; RT5 10w30

Top
#3425910 - 07/15/14 08:14 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
gregk24 Online   content


Registered: 04/13/13
Posts: 3820
Loc: FL, USA
Wow, looks pretty cool. Not sure how reliable things would be though. Looks like it could have sealing issues.
_________________________
2006 Honda Accord 131K
TGMO 0w20

2005 Chevy Uplander 127K
GTX HM SB 5w30

1992 Ford Ranger 338K
MS5K 10w30

1991 Buick Park Avenue 116K
GTX HM SB 10w30

Top
#3425914 - 07/15/14 08:18 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Quest Offline


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 7057
Loc: beaver land EH?
mechanical complexity, coupled with sealing problems (just like wenkel engines), will plague this design in production mode.

Q.
_________________________
"Internet discussion boards act as echo chambers for conspiracy dittoheads" A.Allen

Top
#3425916 - 07/15/14 08:24 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: gregk24]
Nick1994 Offline


Registered: 02/19/13
Posts: 3191
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted By: gregk24
Wow, looks pretty cool. Not sure how reliable things would be though. Looks like it could have sealing issues.


That's what I thought. After many years of use, things are gonna start losing their pressure, metal will fatigue and the whole engine will need replaced. Interesting concept though.
_________________________
2004 VW Beetle TDI 175k

Top
#3425949 - 07/15/14 08:46 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Win Online   content


Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 3664
Loc: Arkansas
Looks like a wobble plate type of air conditioning compressor.

With spark plugs.
_________________________
09 Torrent 3.6 V6 Fram 5/30
09 Solstice 2.4 I4 Fram 5/30
08 G8 3.6 V6 M1 0/40
04 Xj8 4.2 V8 Fram 5/30
99 S-10 2.2 I4
94 Xj12 6.0 V12

Top
#3425950 - 07/15/14 08:47 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Chris142 Offline


Registered: 06/05/03
Posts: 12740
Loc: apple valley, ca
very similar to many a\c compressors
_________________________
02 Wrangler durablend 10w40
87 F250 Diesel Mystic 15w50
04 Tahoe super-s 5w30
Z400 Lucas 10w30
KLR250 Maxima 10w40
Polaris Trailblazer delo 5w40

Top
#3425952 - 07/15/14 08:50 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Subdued Offline


Registered: 10/06/13
Posts: 464
Loc: Youngstown, NY
that's a technological terror if I've ever seen one
_________________________
2008 Chrysler Town & Country Touring 105k
2007 Toyota Yaris S 120k
2003 Ford Taurus SES 115k
2001 Toyota Corolla LE 150k

Top
#3425979 - 07/15/14 09:11 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: Chris142]
scurvy Offline


Registered: 02/19/07
Posts: 2308
Loc: Chicago IL USA
Originally Posted By: Win
Looks like a wobble plate type of air conditioning compressor.

Originally Posted By: Chris142
very similar to many a\c compressors


Quite right. Same design as many existing AC compressors, which work beautifully. No reason it couldn't be adapted to work with spark or compression ignition.
_________________________
You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

06 VW Golf TDI: M1 TDT 5w40, HU726/2x, EaBP90
12 Mazda 5: Amsoil SSO 0W20, FL910S

Top
#3426249 - 07/16/14 07:38 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: Win]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 12210
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
Originally Posted By: Win
Looks like a wobble plate type of air conditioning compressor.

With spark plugs.

Just did a Sanden and it looked just like this 7cyl.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3426363 - 07/16/14 10:32 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
just count the weight of the moving parts. that will tell you all you need to know.

Top
#3427006 - 07/16/14 09:39 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Ram01 Offline


Registered: 10/13/10
Posts: 740
Loc: New York Queens
Wonder what weight oil that motor takes

Top
#3427035 - 07/16/14 10:24 PM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
Kiwi_ME Offline


Registered: 10/24/08
Posts: 889
Loc: New Zealand
I should be patriotic but I think it's a nightmare too. Oddly the animated GIF shows the block stationary while the video shows it rotating, as it needs to, to move pistons past the ports and spark plugs. Perhaps the crank turns at twice head speed for a 4-stroke cycle.
Sealing the head under combustion pressure along with the complex machining of the wobble plate and con rods make it unattractive to me. And the touted advantages of balance and part count answer questions nobody has actually asked.

Compressors use this type of idea (wobble plate with a large number of small cylinders) to avoid pressure pulses in the input/output, hardly an issue in an IC engine where small cylinders have the disadvantage of high heat loss.

Top
#3427134 - 07/17/14 04:09 AM Re: Duke engine......better design? [Re: mcrn]
bruno Offline


Registered: 10/08/07
Posts: 426
Loc: new Jersey
Back in the '50s this was tried .... it was called a Swash Plate design . Fine for clean conditions like AC compressors but otherwise it was a dud .

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it's worth doing .


Edited by bruno (07/17/14 04:11 AM)

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >