Recent Topics
2016 Malibu
by Tzu
02/14/16 07:47 AM
2011 Outback, Unknown Oil, 5K miles
by Al
02/14/16 07:13 AM
Mechanics of no-fault insurance
by Quattro Pete
02/14/16 06:10 AM
Classic Shell Start Menu
by GumbyJarvis
02/14/16 03:35 AM
Does anyone here know anything about furnaces?
by grampi
02/14/16 03:29 AM
Vavoline next gen motor oil?
by gmh101357
02/14/16 12:10 AM
Thin oil, thick oil, synth or dino,
by Cruzingoose
02/13/16 11:25 PM
Compete today? Modernize your skills on own time
by spackard
02/13/16 11:23 PM
Castrol 0w30 leaving Advance Auto Parts
by bbhero
02/13/16 10:53 PM
Oil Change Marathon Today
by BlueOvalFitter
02/13/16 10:01 PM
Raybestos Advance Tech or Police Rotors?
by shiny
02/13/16 09:57 PM
Oil filtration and circulation question
by Doublehaul
02/13/16 09:41 PM
Newest Members
Lemioux, Tsr71, SubaFool, dookchoppa, Formula413
56911 Registered Users
Who's Online
90 registered (04SE, barryh, Abakev, 2015_PSD, AZjeff, 9 invisible), 1201 Guests and 127 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
56911 Members
66 Forums
244676 Topics
3985713 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3422537 - 07/12/14 10:15 AM Ecoboost or Not.
tangojetta Offline


Registered: 11/15/06
Posts: 207
Loc: MN
Looking to replace our 06 Ford Freestyle with 220,000 miles with a Ford Flex with 3.5 Ecoboost motor. After doing some looking around, I'm having having second thoughts about it.

_________________________

06 Ford Freestyle awd ltd

Top
#3422546 - 07/12/14 10:28 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
loyd Offline


Registered: 08/30/12
Posts: 144
Loc: California
The video in the link you posted is talking about the ecoboost 2.0 liter engine, not the 3.5 liter engine. Plus, you can't believe everything you read on the internet. If you want the truth I suggest you call Ford and talk to them about your concerns.

Top
#3422563 - 07/12/14 10:52 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
GutsyGecko Offline


Registered: 08/16/12
Posts: 426
Loc: Youngstown, OH
I just bought my 2nd ecoboost vehicle from ford. Both hve been trouble free in relation to the drivetrain. One has 3k, the other 73k.

Top
#3422564 - 07/12/14 10:54 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
RISUPERCREWMAN Offline


Registered: 07/29/08
Posts: 946
Loc: RHODE ISLAND
I would Never my an Eco-Doom Anything since I keep my vehicles well past the factory or extended warranty periods!
_________________________
2014 Ram 2500 HD 5.7 Hemi 4x4 5300K miles
2015 Harley Davidson Ultra Limited 1400 miles
2009 Toyota V6 XLE Camry 44K miles

Top
#3422584 - 07/12/14 11:33 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Drew99GT Offline


Registered: 10/11/02
Posts: 21390
Loc: Colorado Springs
What the guy is talking about isn't so much Ecoboost in and of itself, it's the intake valve problems with GDI engines and how to safely deal with them. If I were to ever buy a GDI equipped vehicle, the first thing I'd do is buy a Mishimoto oil catch can and learn a safe method for cleaning the induction system, such as using CRCs GDI specific intake valve cleaner.

Top
#3422587 - 07/12/14 11:44 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Miller88 Offline


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 10212
Loc: Onondaga County
If you install a catch can you won't have the inherent issues of intake valve carboning up.

I like the ecoboost engines. Great torque.
_________________________
I run the 10w30 becuase 0w20 makes my CVT shift funny

Top
#3422591 - 07/12/14 11:51 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 13108
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
DI and Ecoboost are not on my list of things to own. When the majority of these vehicle hit 100K then we will have a better idea how they will hold up.
It doesn't sound promising if they are really authorizing head replacements because there is no approved induction service, something doesn't sound right there.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3422592 - 07/12/14 11:54 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Drew99GT Offline


Registered: 10/11/02
Posts: 21390
Loc: Colorado Springs
OK, after reviewing both vids that guy posted, I guess it is an Ecoboost problem; turbos blowing up from induction cleaning. Introducing too many hydrocarbons in the engine which heats the turbos up too much and kills them.

Are there any induction/fuel system type cleaners that don't have so many petroleum distillates and are synthetic and wouldn't burn when introduced into the combustion chamber? Is that even possible??? An all PEA based cleaner perhaps, since PEA supposedly survives the combustion process and doesn't actually burn? CRCs GDI cleaner has no PEA and is petroleum distillates on steroids. It's no good in a GDI turbo engine.

Top
#3422595 - 07/12/14 11:58 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Drew99GT Offline


Registered: 10/11/02
Posts: 21390
Loc: Colorado Springs


part 2. Great video with visible evidence it's the PCV system that gums up the valves. The manufacturers of GDI engines are going to have to create factory oil breather tanks that are maintenance free and drain the collected condensed oil back to the oil sump. I'm pretty sure some German makes do this as you can buy replacement tanks from Purolator that have inlet and outlet barbs from the PCV line, and a barb that connects a hose to the crankcase.

Top
#3422596 - 07/12/14 11:59 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
cb_13 Offline


Registered: 07/24/11
Posts: 641
Loc: Missouri
Granted they're still relatively new but the only issues I've seen with the 3.5 EB engines is the moisture build up in the charge air cooler on the F150. Of course new technology scares alot of people. Maybe one manufacturer will bring out a push rod, carbureted straight six with 3 spd column shift manual for trucks and full size cars. Should sell since its "proven" technology like so many say they prefer.

Top
#3422626 - 07/12/14 12:53 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
klt1986 Offline


Registered: 04/08/09
Posts: 142
Loc: Southern VA
Take this for what it is worth. One of my extra duty's for the department I work for is fleet manager of vehicles. Our department is transitioning from Ford CVPI's to Dodge Chargers(5.7 Hemi's). We decided to go with the Chargers after consulting with mechanics and watching the issues of our neighboring department and their Eco-Boost engines.

The neighboring department went with the Ford Interceptors and has been having quite a few problems with oil consumption, rear end issues, and turbo issues. All at less than 40,000 miles. I feel like the oil consumption and turbo issues are related to each other. I have driven the Interceptors and they are fun to drive, certainly faster than the CVPI's, but I don't see the EB engine taking a lot of long term abuse...in real world applications.


Edited by klt1986 (07/12/14 12:54 PM)
_________________________
00 Mercury Grand Marquis 4.6L, PYB 5w-30
08 Honda CR-V 2.4L 4WD, Edge 0w-20
11 Toyota Tundra DC 4WD 5.7L, TGMO 0W-20

Top
#3422660 - 07/12/14 01:23 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
earlyre Offline


Registered: 11/22/11
Posts: 3042
Loc: Lima, Ohio, USA
Good place for this question is over @ TCCA(taurusclub.com) as the flex is on the same platform as the 5th gen Taurus ( including the five hundred/montego/freestyle, and the 6th gen(current) Taurus.) Lots of guys with real world miles in Eco boost Tauri
_________________________
Mine:
09 Mercury Sable : 6qts Motorcraft blend 5w20, Motorcraft Fl-400s
Mine to Maintain:
03 Pontiac Vibe : 4.5qts GC 0w30, Fram XG4967

Top
#3422671 - 07/12/14 01:36 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
double vanos Offline


Registered: 08/05/04
Posts: 1181
Loc: Bisbee, Arizona
I have a 2011 EB FX4 with 69k miles and have only replaced spark plugs (once) and filters. It gets middle grade gas and oil changes at 4k miles with Castrol Edge EP and FL500s filters. It runs stronger now than when new. I worry more about the transmission having to deal 300 - 400 + pounds of torque every day than I do the engine...
Just my experience....
_________________________
Svetlana Kapanina is harder core than Sabine Schmitz.
www.kapanina.com

Top
#3422713 - 07/12/14 02:41 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
901Memphis Offline


Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 9834
Loc: Northern Kentucky
Since you like to keep your vehicle past 200k, i wouldn't recommend going with something that probably doesn't have any examples at 200k yet to see how they last at that age. It might take serious repairs to get them to 200k+.
_________________________
2002 Buick Century 118k - Built 4T65e - M1 0w40 /Fram Ultra XG 3387A
1998 Nissan Altima 335k - 5MT - M1 HM 5w30/Fram Ultra XG7317

Top
#3422770 - 07/12/14 03:59 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Danh Offline


Registered: 10/16/10
Posts: 947
Loc: Illinois
Interesting video that may have valuable information. Two points, though:

1) Does anyone else find it curious that a Ford tech would go public with potentially damaging information that Ford hasn't released yet? The guy is identifiable and even has a name tag. Maybe he's just brave.

2) He's diagnosed poor DI cold engine performance as caused by intake valve deposits. But, this is a problem associated with PORT injected engines: fuel is absorbed by carbon deposits on cold intake valves, making the mixture leaner than intended. In a DI engine, fuel never washes over the intake valves so no absorption occurs. Maybe there's another explanation but to me it seems he has mixed DI characteristics with PFI problems.

Mind you, I'd be reluctant to buy a new EcoBoost engine, too, but am not convinced this video tells the whole story.

Top
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >