Pennzoil Q&A

Click here to participate in the Pennzoil Q&A

Recent Topics
60 Watt LED Lightbulbs 2 pk $4 ..Lowes
by Warstud
09/03/15 06:16 PM
M1 0W40 in a VQ35
by mclasser
09/03/15 06:05 PM
Blown spark plug.
by Colt45ws
09/03/15 05:08 PM
New/NOS Service Champ OF5230 cut open
by slacktide_bitog
09/03/15 05:00 PM
250 Rebel vs 250 V-Star
by totegoat
09/03/15 04:53 PM
2014 Mitsubishi Mirage 0W20 Castrol Syntech 3k OCI
by alex16
09/03/15 04:41 PM
Another Ebay change
by BRZED
09/03/15 04:39 PM
Tragic Image of Drowned Syrian Toddler
by HTSS_TR
09/03/15 04:16 PM
polishing roof of a pickup
by cat843
09/03/15 03:54 PM
Tire Pressure "On-Board Sensor" accuracy vs.
by ExMachina
09/03/15 03:25 PM
one man brake bleed help (trying a gravity bleed?)
by columnshift
09/03/15 03:17 PM
A Short Time Line for Development
by MolaKule
09/03/15 03:05 PM
Newest Members
Lvchief81, p75bojan, Roby466, niko493, Asqueroso
55252 Registered Users
Who's Online
95 registered (3311, AdRock, aircooled, akela, AandPDan, 87sammy, 8 invisible), 1579 Guests and 126 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
55252 Members
66 Forums
236898 Topics
3817876 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#3401022 - 06/18/14 09:51 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: Falcon_LS]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 7589
Loc: Florida
Originally Posted By: Falcon_LS
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT
All I can say is, I'm glad they're taking it seriously now. I'll give GM credit for that.


I'm glad someone else looks at it the same way. Instead of hiding it under the bed sheets, they're taking responsibility for their actions in the past and doing something about it.

If they really cared that much, they would have gone back, and recalled most of their V6 engines that have weak intake manifold gaskets.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3401043 - 06/18/14 10:06 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
FetchFar Offline


Registered: 10/17/13
Posts: 831
Loc: Colorado
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.
_________________________
'07 BMW 530xi N52 engine, E60 chassis, 255 hp
'11 Chevy Camaro LS, 3.6L V6, Zeta chassis, 312 hp
'40 Chevrolet Special Deluxe 2-Door Town Sedan

Top
#3401187 - 06/19/14 05:14 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: FetchFar]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 16695
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: FetchFar
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.


Interesting dichotomy, eh? And with 9 of the 13 reported incidents suggesting driver impairment in decade old car, too.

Absolute baloney as far as I'm concerned...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3401226 - 06/19/14 07:12 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
supton Offline


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 6587
Loc: NH
I don't know about being "complete" baloney but it does underscore how many things have to go wrong. Bad switch, too many keys on the ring, bad driver and bad luck. Remove any one of them, and voila! no incidents.
_________________________
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 6spd manual, 95k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra double cab, 4.6L, auto, 98k, his

Top
#3401499 - 06/19/14 12:58 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
Win Offline


Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 3712
Loc: Arkansas
I'll say this for them - they're persistent to the point of driving me batty with recall notices on the ignition cylinder for the Solstice.

They've sent at least two letters to the lake house, which is the address I used for the purchase of the car.

They've figured out I have another address for the other Pontiacs, and have sent letters there.

The other day I got an e mail about it.

Now, I'm getting postcards from the dealer about the recall.

I think it's been almost two years since the car has moved from the garage, so I don't have much interest in getting it out just for this recall (GM knows this too - the OnStar subscription is still active).

Particularly when the switch works just fine.

I understand erring on the side of caution, but this seems really overblown.
_________________________
09 Torrent 3.6 V6 PYB 5/30
09 Solstice 2.4 I4 Fram 5/30
08 G8 3.6 V6 Fram 5/30
04 Xj8 4.2 V8 Hav 5/40
99 S-10 2.2 I4
94 Xj12 6.0 V12

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3