Recent Topics
topping off with non-HDEO
by meborder
05/25/15 10:31 PM
Microgard MGL9018 unknown miles - yikes
by MoreCowbellAz
05/25/15 10:29 PM
Have any of you gone to see Fury Road?
by BRZED
05/25/15 09:58 PM
Finally Found Pennzoil Ultra at Walmart
by mike718
05/25/15 09:52 PM
Mopar or Other
by DarthDuty
05/25/15 09:35 PM
Another overfilling ATF question
by mclasser
05/25/15 09:05 PM
ATF for 1997 4l60E
by cdm1993
05/25/15 08:47 PM
Champ Oil Filters, Should I Buy This?
by s1mp13m4n
05/25/15 08:15 PM
Subaru fan not turning on.
by simple_gifts
05/25/15 08:12 PM
electric pool pump motor noisey
by raaizin
05/25/15 07:44 PM
2014 Dodge Durango AWD transfer case fluid
by wwillson
05/25/15 07:08 PM
Old Porsche
by mjoekingz28
05/25/15 06:41 PM
Newest Members
Duc, Willroach, yanis, mattoutkast, TiredOfJunk
54103 Registered Users
Who's Online
92 registered (bluesubie, andyd, Atlantis, Billbert, Best F100, ArtDart, 7 invisible), 1409 Guests and 117 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54103 Members
66 Forums
231865 Topics
3716492 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#3401022 - 06/18/14 09:51 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: Falcon_LS]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 7455
Loc: Florida
Originally Posted By: Falcon_LS
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT
All I can say is, I'm glad they're taking it seriously now. I'll give GM credit for that.


I'm glad someone else looks at it the same way. Instead of hiding it under the bed sheets, they're taking responsibility for their actions in the past and doing something about it.

If they really cared that much, they would have gone back, and recalled most of their V6 engines that have weak intake manifold gaskets.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3401043 - 06/18/14 10:06 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
FetchFar Offline


Registered: 10/17/13
Posts: 831
Loc: Colorado
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.
_________________________
'07 BMW 530xi N52 engine, E60 chassis, 255 hp
'11 Chevy Camaro LS, 3.6L V6, Zeta chassis, 312 hp
'40 Chevrolet Special Deluxe 2-Door Town Sedan

Top
#3401187 - 06/19/14 05:14 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: FetchFar]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 16158
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: FetchFar
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.


Interesting dichotomy, eh? And with 9 of the 13 reported incidents suggesting driver impairment in decade old car, too.

Absolute baloney as far as I'm concerned...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3401226 - 06/19/14 07:12 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
supton Online   content


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 6086
Loc: NH
I don't know about being "complete" baloney but it does underscore how many things have to go wrong. Bad switch, too many keys on the ring, bad driver and bad luck. Remove any one of them, and voila! no incidents.
_________________________
2004 VW Jetta Wagon, TDI, 5spd manual, 312kmile, his
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 6spd manual, 92k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra double cab, 4.6L, auto, 94k

Top
#3401499 - 06/19/14 12:58 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
Win Offline


Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 3588
Loc: Arkansas
I'll say this for them - they're persistent to the point of driving me batty with recall notices on the ignition cylinder for the Solstice.

They've sent at least two letters to the lake house, which is the address I used for the purchase of the car.

They've figured out I have another address for the other Pontiacs, and have sent letters there.

The other day I got an e mail about it.

Now, I'm getting postcards from the dealer about the recall.

I think it's been almost two years since the car has moved from the garage, so I don't have much interest in getting it out just for this recall (GM knows this too - the OnStar subscription is still active).

Particularly when the switch works just fine.

I understand erring on the side of caution, but this seems really overblown.
_________________________
09 Torrent 3.6 V6 Fram 5/30
09 Solstice 2.4 I4 Fram 5/30
08 G8 3.6 V6 M1 0/40
04 Xj8 4.2 V8 Fram 5/30
99 S-10 2.2 I4
94 Xj12 6.0 V12

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3