Recent Topics
Oil filter recommendation
by lawman1909
8 minutes 31 seconds ago
Tiller identification
by cptbarkey
16 minutes 0 seconds ago
Makita WT01W Cordless 3/8 Inch Impact
by Cressida
58 minutes 30 seconds ago
Tire swap: Dodge GC/Chrysler T&C
by otis24
Today at 04:13 PM
The next gen electric car?
by Volvohead
Today at 03:31 PM
Fram TG3506 Cut Open
by NMBurb02
Today at 03:30 PM
1998 Corolla Catalytic Converter Compatability
by 01_celica_gt
Today at 03:25 PM
Bosch Premium 3423 Cut Open (Money Shots Only)
by NMBurb02
Today at 03:05 PM
Ac issue on focus STILL!!
by ram_man
Today at 02:37 PM
snow tires for sale
by bdzik
Today at 02:30 PM
1995 Toyota Tercel DX, 260,000 kms.
by Speed_Racer
Today at 02:26 PM
Bosch Premium 3331 Cut Open
by NMBurb02
Today at 02:26 PM
Newest Members
Lexusguy, atomb, snapple37, Speed_Racer, DennisWaller
51164 Registered Users
Who's Online
112 registered (6starprez, 901Memphis, 65f100, 01_celica_gt, ag_ghost, 123Saab, 9 invisible), 1762 Guests and 201 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51164 Members
64 Forums
218644 Topics
3447587 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#3401022 - 06/18/14 09:51 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: Falcon_LS]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 6714
Loc: Florida
Originally Posted By: Falcon_LS
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT
All I can say is, I'm glad they're taking it seriously now. I'll give GM credit for that.


I'm glad someone else looks at it the same way. Instead of hiding it under the bed sheets, they're taking responsibility for their actions in the past and doing something about it.

If they really cared that much, they would have gone back, and recalled most of their V6 engines that have weak intake manifold gaskets.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3401043 - 06/18/14 10:06 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
FetchFar Offline


Registered: 10/17/13
Posts: 831
Loc: Colorado
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.
_________________________
'07 BMW 530xi N52 engine, E60 chassis, 255 hp
'11 Chevy Camaro LS, 3.6L V6, Zeta chassis, 312 hp
'40 Chevrolet Special Deluxe 2-Door Town Sedan

Top
#3401187 - 06/19/14 05:14 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: FetchFar]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 14554
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: FetchFar
Strange: GM gets in trouble because thier ignition switches turn off the car while driving, and Toyota gets in trouble (runaway throttles) because their push-buttons they use DON'T allow you to turn the car off while driving that easily.


Interesting dichotomy, eh? And with 9 of the 13 reported incidents suggesting driver impairment in decade old car, too.

Absolute baloney as far as I'm concerned...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3401226 - 06/19/14 07:12 AM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
supton Offline


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 4487
Loc: NH
I don't know about being "complete" baloney but it does underscore how many things have to go wrong. Bad switch, too many keys on the ring, bad driver and bad luck. Remove any one of them, and voila! no incidents.
_________________________
2004 VW Jetta Wagon, TDI, 5spd manual, 297kmile, his
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 6spd manual, 76k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra double cab, 4.6L, auto, 88k

Top
#3401499 - 06/19/14 12:58 PM Re: Another 3.16 Million GM Recall [Re: tenderloin]
Win Offline


Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 3291
Loc: Arkansas
I'll say this for them - they're persistent to the point of driving me batty with recall notices on the ignition cylinder for the Solstice.

They've sent at least two letters to the lake house, which is the address I used for the purchase of the car.

They've figured out I have another address for the other Pontiacs, and have sent letters there.

The other day I got an e mail about it.

Now, I'm getting postcards from the dealer about the recall.

I think it's been almost two years since the car has moved from the garage, so I don't have much interest in getting it out just for this recall (GM knows this too - the OnStar subscription is still active).

Particularly when the switch works just fine.

I understand erring on the side of caution, but this seems really overblown.
_________________________
09 Torrent 3.6 V6 Fram 5/30
09 Solstice 2.4 I4 Fram 5/30
08 G8 3.6 V6 M1 0/40
04 Xj8 4.2 V8 Fram 5/30
99 S-10 2.2 I4
94 Xj12 6.0 V12

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3