Recent Topics
Castrol Edge (Black Bottle) now with titanium?
by 209paulc
15 minutes 8 seconds ago
Yukon pinion and carrier bearings....
by kenwin30
22 minutes 33 seconds ago
Some really interesting state rankings
by Apollo14
24 minutes 54 seconds ago
Parents got a new used truck...
by 01rangerxl
46 minutes 52 seconds ago
Harbor Freight weekend blowout sale
by L_Sludger
Today at 03:36 PM
GE Nighthawk Headlight Bulbs 2-Pack for $10.60
by Tony_Mack
Today at 03:05 PM
Impact gun advice
by zppeterson
Today at 02:52 PM
Expensive Fram Ultra filters around $30 each
by tommygunn
Today at 02:21 PM
Graphite / Moly brake caliper grease is awesome
by PandaBear
Today at 01:46 PM
"Keeping in touch" after moving...
by 97tbird
Today at 01:44 PM
Oil Change Place put universal fluid in a Chrysler
by carguy996
Today at 01:21 PM
Chrysler 2.7 Burning Oil Smell
by carguy996
Today at 01:16 PM
Newest Members
FabSpecialists, Sanddog, 87Diesel, genericnj, Quickvr4
51341 Registered Users
Who's Online
97 registered (05LGTLtd, 209paulc, 2010_FX4, 97tbird, 1foxracing, 901Memphis, 7 invisible), 1733 Guests and 246 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51341 Members
64 Forums
219480 Topics
3463989 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3396636 - 06/13/14 02:10 PM basic home test of Star Tron....
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 3699
Loc: KC
http://www.thehulltruth.com/boating-forum/430716-ethanol-sludge-unscientific-startron-test.html

Since people seem to be into testing from users lately, maybe some would be interested in this one.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX Kendall 5w-20, MC Fl910s, 110k+
2012 Mazda 3i Skyactiv PP 5W-20, 6spd MTX Redline MTL, 35k+

Top
#3396650 - 06/13/14 02:25 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 3315
Loc: USA
Something is wrong,cant get into that page.Must be sludged up...

Top
#3396673 - 06/13/14 02:45 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Donald Offline


Registered: 03/21/04
Posts: 13448
Loc: Upstate NY
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.
_________________________
2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 - PP & M1
1999 Dodge Ram 2500 w/Cummins - Rotella T6 & M1
Amsoil ATF in both vehicles & Magnefine filter.

Top
#3396675 - 06/13/14 02:47 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: Donald]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 3699
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.


It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX Kendall 5w-20, MC Fl910s, 110k+
2012 Mazda 3i Skyactiv PP 5W-20, 6spd MTX Redline MTL, 35k+

Top
#3396785 - 06/13/14 04:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 624
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3396891 - 06/13/14 07:06 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: dave5358]
GatorJ Offline


Registered: 07/24/03
Posts: 163
Loc: Tampa
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Donald
The test was trying to dissolve formed varnish particles. Most people are looking to prevent fuel and ethanol problems not dissolving particles of varnish. So I am not sure how valid a test it was.

It isn't valid at all. Home testing can rarely be done in a "valid" manner.

I hope you're being sarcastic.


Or obtuse.

Top
#3397262 - 06/14/14 08:38 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
05LGTLtd Online   content


Registered: 03/04/13
Posts: 693
Loc: Va
The first thing I would question is why would you test an additive at full strength, especially on that claims to be an 'enzyme' additive. It's designed to work diluted with gasoline, why not do the bench test with a mix?

I use StarTron in an older vehicle and my OPE regularly. I don't expect miracles, but so far no problems with it for me. I started a thread a while back asking if any of the chemists here on the board could give some insight on the enzyme additive and never heard much...
_________________________
2005 Legacy GT, M1 TDT
2010 Forester SOHC, GC 0w-30

Top
#3397267 - 06/14/14 08:48 AM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 9627
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
The marinas i do work for claim it hasn't helped with their ethanol issues.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3398410 - 06/15/14 07:38 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: badtlc]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

Top
#3398440 - 06/15/14 08:04 PM Re: basic home test of Star Tron.... [Re: morris]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 624
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: morris
a real test has to be a "double blind" test. i think what that means is ALL the people doing the test dont know what if they are using oil "A" or "B". could i be right?

As opposed to an unreal test? Double blind testing is frequently done with test medications: both the patient and the person administering the drug don't know if the pill is the real drug or a placebo. Hence, 'double blind'.

If you were testing an engine or an additive or some mechanical device, you might be better off keeping both eyes open. The only possible need for a double blind test would be a situation in which the test operator could materially influence the results, or if you planned to simply asked the operator for his opinion ("yeah, it ran great!"). If you can measure the results more objectively (more mpg per the ECU, greater cylinder pressure per the pressure gauge, less fuel used based on pump records) there is little need for a double blind test.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top