Recent Topics
ST 5w30 ok for 11' Impala 3.5 engine
by car51
38 minutes 23 seconds ago
small air compressor greasing
by friendly_jacek
Today at 05:00 PM
Oil Recommendations for two vehicles / 0w20/5w30
by MisterBen
Today at 04:59 PM
Husqvarna XP vs Low Smoke oil
by Buzzsaw
Today at 04:20 PM
Looking Equivalent for Synchromesh Part #12345349
by perryg114
Today at 03:55 PM
Wife received debt collection letter
by chiefsfan1
Today at 03:34 PM
Honda D series and 0w20
by EWPE
Today at 02:23 PM
Higher End Mower to recommend to Customers
by yeehaw1960
Today at 02:19 PM
Michelin Pilot Super Sport 500+ mile review
by JHZR2
Today at 02:15 PM
how much to check out the front end of a vehicle?
by motor_oil_madman
Today at 01:42 PM
which tq converter for my 408 stroker?
by tomcat27
Today at 01:42 PM
Best 0w-20 oil available on the Danish market
by shDK
Today at 01:11 PM
Newest Members
Doxxy, Jetstreamz06, TalNum, Spinnizle, JustinL
57758 Registered Users
Who's Online
91 registered (bdcardinal, artificialist, beechcraftted, 2015_PSD, 440Magnum, 86cutlass307, 15 invisible), 1747 Guests and 312 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
57758 Members
66 Forums
248317 Topics
4060470 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3394811 - 06/11/14 01:19 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: badtlc]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 13587
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
In this case I'm happy to be missing out at least for now.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3394847 - 06/11/14 02:08 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: nicholas]
y_p_w Offline


Registered: 05/06/05
Posts: 2776
Loc: SF Bay Area
How do you avoid it these days? There are just too many cars with DI engines.

I do rather like the idea of a secondary injector to simply spray down the valves. If the detergent is strong enough, it wouldn't have to be much. I think some of the injector patterns are designed to try and get some of the spray mist to the valves.

Top
#3394855 - 06/11/14 02:17 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: Trav]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 24763
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: Trav
In this case I'm happy to be missing out at least for now.


Me too. When they get it all ironed out, and these threads stop I'm in.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3394884 - 06/11/14 02:48 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: demarpaint]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4796
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Trav
In this case I'm happy to be missing out at least for now.


Me too. When they get it all ironed out, and these threads stop I'm in.


I guess you don't drive any vehicle? I see threads on every engine imaginable having issues. Are you still waiting for those issues to get ironed out? You must be a very fit person with all that walking and biking.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, MC Fl910s, 135k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 40k+

Top
#3394907 - 06/11/14 03:19 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: badtlc]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 24763
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Trav
In this case I'm happy to be missing out at least for now.


Me too. When they get it all ironed out, and these threads stop I'm in.


I guess you don't drive any vehicle? I see threads on every engine imaginable having issues. Are you still waiting for those issues to get ironed out? You must be a very fit person with all that walking and biking.


I drive plenty, and have been since the 1970's, and yes I'm fit. A few times a month these DI threads keep popping up. I'd guess for every DI car there's maybe 100 EFI cars, yet percent wise there are more people asking for fixes for DI than EFI. They'll get it ironed out. IMO and the opinions of a few experts I spoken with it's not quite there yet.


You can also shoot Trav a PM he runs a fuel injector cleaning business let him tell you his professional observations about DI.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3394927 - 06/11/14 03:44 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: nicholas]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 24763
Loc: NY
Too late to edit. That 100:1 figure is extremely conservative I'm sure. It was just to bring out a point.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3394953 - 06/11/14 04:26 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: demarpaint]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4796
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: demarpaint

I drive plenty, and have been since the 1970's, and yes I'm fit. A few times a month these DI threads keep popping up. I'd guess for every DI car there's maybe 100 EFI cars, yet percent wise there are more people asking for fixes for DI than EFI. They'll get it ironed out. IMO and the opinions of a few experts I spoken with it's not quite there yet.


You can also shoot Trav a PM he runs a fuel injector cleaning business let him tell you his professional observations about DI.


You confuse people looking for preventative measures for actual problems. I don't see many threads on actual valve deposits on here at all.

Those that get the deposits can easily burn them off if they choose to.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, MC Fl910s, 135k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 40k+

Top
#3394958 - 06/11/14 04:33 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: nicholas]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 24763
Loc: NY
Read the threads, if there weren't any problems we wouldn't be having these discussions a few times a month.

Shoot Trav a PM too.


Edited by demarpaint (06/11/14 04:35 PM)
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3395025 - 06/11/14 05:57 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: demarpaint]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4796
Loc: KC
I have read them. Have you? Lots of concerned people with very few actual incidents.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, MC Fl910s, 135k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 40k+

Top
#3395059 - 06/11/14 07:12 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: badtlc]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 13587
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Those that get the deposits can easily burn them off if they choose to.

Not true in all cases. Way too broad a brush with that statement IMO.
Look at this then tell me how running the engine at 3K for 20 min is going to clean this mess up.
If that had even the most remote chance of working i think VW/Audi and others would be recommending it as preventive maintenance.

http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/336352-Audi-FSI-Engine-Carbon-Build-up-Megathread

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2012/05/ask-an-engineer-gdi-problems-in-a-nutshell

http://www.dailytech.com/Direct+Injected...rticle21962.htm

http://www.munichmotorsport.com/wordpress/?page_id=601

I have a few Di injectors from hi revving marine engines that are damaged beyond repair and they see 5,000 RPM for extended period.
Because your car isn't having the issue yet you cant claim anything will work on all engines.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3395076 - 06/11/14 07:38 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: nicholas]
y_p_w Offline


Registered: 05/06/05
Posts: 2776
Loc: SF Bay Area
I think I get the issue with the valves in DI engines gunking up. Port fuel injectors spray the mist into the cylinder through the intake valve. So the valve gets a nice spray of fuel, which should contain the detergents to remove whatever deposits attach up there after an explosion.

But with a DI engine, the injector is right there in the cylinder and bypasses the intake valve. It can create a more efficient/even fuel mist, but it's no longer spraying down the valves.

I suppose a little of the fuel still manages to get to the valves, but that might not be adequate to prevent buildup of crud.

Of course there are some concepts of valve materials that will resist buildup, but that's not tested. The traditional method of spraying down the valves with fuel mist works. I've heard of secondary injectors. And maybe not even one at each cylinder, but just one for each bank of cylinders.

Top
#3395169 - 06/11/14 09:25 PM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: badtlc]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 24763
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: badtlc
I have read them. Have you? Lots of concerned people with very few actual incidents.


Actually I did read up on it, a lot. I also discussed it with an expert in the field, Trav. That's why I feel the way I do about the system. It is still evolving and maybe in another few years will be as problem free as EFI currently is with regard to valve deposits, etc. I will say some DI engines are much better than others.


Edited by demarpaint (06/11/14 09:33 PM)
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3395363 - 06/12/14 06:57 AM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: y_p_w]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 13587
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
Originally Posted By: y_p_w
How do you avoid it these days? There are just too many cars with DI engines.

I do rather like the idea of a secondary injector to simply spray down the valves. If the detergent is strong enough, it wouldn't have to be much. I think some of the injector patterns are designed to try and get some of the spray mist to the valves.


I have been predicting the use of a hybrid system for this problem for years, long before one appeared on the market. Its the only real way.
They cant sell a vehicle mass market and expect the owners to install catch cans and drive the car like a lunatic on crack every so often to keep the thing clean, these are not viable solutions.

I can see a simple throttle body type FI taking over for around town, cold start and low speed operation.
Then let the DI kick in when more power is needed and cruising when the engine is warmed up.
They almost have it now it just needs to be simplified. It going to happen but this technology is going through a lot of redevelopment and i don't want to be a guinea pig.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#3395390 - 06/12/14 07:36 AM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: Trav]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4796
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Trav
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Those that get the deposits can easily burn them off if they choose to.

Not true in all cases. Way too broad a brush with that statement IMO.
Look at this then tell me how running the engine at 3K for 20 min is going to clean this mess up.
If that had even the most remote chance of working i think VW/Audi and others would be recommending it as preventive maintenance.

http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/336352-Audi-FSI-Engine-Carbon-Build-up-Megathread

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2012/05/ask-an-engineer-gdi-problems-in-a-nutshell

http://www.dailytech.com/Direct+Injected...rticle21962.htm

http://www.munichmotorsport.com/wordpress/?page_id=601

I have a few Di injectors from hi revving marine engines that are damaged beyond repair and they see 5,000 RPM for extended period.
Because your car isn't having the issue yet you cant claim anything will work on all engines.


3k doesn't cut. VW specifically stated 4,500+ RPMs. And yes, it does work, has been documented with photos to work.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, MC Fl910s, 135k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 40k+

Top
#3395393 - 06/12/14 07:37 AM Re: In tank additives for DI [Re: demarpaint]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4796
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: badtlc
I have read them. Have you? Lots of concerned people with very few actual incidents.


Actually I did read up on it, a lot. I also discussed it with an expert in the field, Trav. That's why I feel the way I do about the system. It is still evolving and maybe in another few years will be as problem free as EFI currently is with regard to valve deposits, etc. I will say some DI engines are much better than others.


So you are giving up on your claim about threads on this forum with people having all these problems? That is progress.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, MC Fl910s, 135k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 40k+

Top
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >