Recent Topics
Rural King oil $1.49
by dlundblad
11/26/14 09:18 PM
Time to brine the turkey!
by Pajamarama
11/26/14 09:10 PM
More Air bag stuff
by ls1mike
11/26/14 09:06 PM
Does the brand of gas really matter?
by ZiTS
11/26/14 09:02 PM
Tractor Supply - Black Friday the 28th of Nov
by Bud_One
11/26/14 08:36 PM
Best wiper blades?
by turbotuff
11/26/14 08:33 PM
Body (car) parts......
by daves87rs
11/26/14 07:37 PM
what do you gain running stoopidly thick oil?
by leroyd92
11/26/14 06:58 PM
My Navara Lube specs
by Shannow
11/26/14 04:48 PM
OPEC will not cut production
by Drew99GT
11/26/14 04:47 PM
Why is Diesel Fuel so Much More Expensive?
by Nick1994
11/26/14 04:43 PM
Advance Auto 25% off promo
by LotI
11/26/14 04:33 PM
Newest Members
Visco, papajetta, MalfunctionProne, royston59, TriboOilGuy
52005 Registered Users
Who's Online
95 registered (74DartSport, aa1986, andyd, asand1, asiancivicmaniac, 123Saab, 8 invisible), 1255 Guests and 176 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
52005 Members
66 Forums
222655 Topics
3524785 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3390995 - 06/06/14 07:34 PM Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 27096
Loc: a prison island
Investigation into Power Losses in Automotive Bearings

Paper discusses the presence or otherwise of mixed/boundary lubrication in automotive journal bearings, and the resultant friction and power loss.

Has both computational and test bench (applied reciprocating load, variable speed), and compares SAE 40 and SAE 20 lubricants.

(Figure 3 supports one of Gokhan's assertions regarding viscosity/pressure.)

(Paper also supports my previous assertion that temperature rises in bearings of 20C are typical).

Quote:
As SAE20 oil has about half the viscosity of SAE40 (see
Figure 3), the operating conditions in the journal bearings are
distinctly different. The difference in viscosity affects the load carrying capacity of the journal bearing which is consequently reduced for lubrication with SAE20 and weak mixed lubrication occurs.

This can be seen in Figure 9 where the friction power losses due to hydrodynamic lubrication and due to metal-metal contact are shown separately for the test bearing. As only during a
short time of the load cycle metal-metal contact occurs, the load cycle averaged contribution of metal-metal contact to the total friction power losses appears rather low with 5 W despite that significant amounts of metal-metal contact occur for a short time of the load cycle.


If you look up the article, Fig9 shows are power consumption for the 40 weight oil of 600W, versus 500W for the 20...clearly a major reduction in frictional work, and a driver for economy.

Extrapolation from this is what the likes of Honda are showing, we are at the end of the diminishing returns with bearings, and any reduction in viscosity is leading to more mixed lubrication...so they are going thinner, while increasing their bearing projected areas, and reducing clearances...which increase drag, but also indicate that their gains are being made elsewhere (pistons, actual viscous pumping in galleries, dunno what else).

Top
#3391031 - 06/06/14 08:12 PM Re: Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes [Re: Shannow]
d00df00d Offline


Registered: 10/20/05
Posts: 9294
Loc: PA
Interesting. Thanks for posting!
_________________________
2011 Mazda RX-8 R3
Castrol GTX 5w-20

Top
#3391075 - 06/06/14 09:01 PM Re: Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes [Re: Shannow]
Rand Offline


Registered: 08/20/03
Posts: 8012
Loc: Barberton,Ohio
thanks for posting something that isn't someones "personal theory"

And an excellent read.
_________________________
2015 Forester I-Premium 6MT


Top
#3391112 - 06/06/14 09:44 PM Re: Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes [Re: Shannow]
jrustles Offline


Registered: 02/24/13
Posts: 2035
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Thanks for posting. It's a nice recent paper too thumbsup
_________________________
"No matter how paranoid or conspiracy-minded you are, what the government is actually doing is worse than you imagine" W.Blum

Top
#3391151 - 06/06/14 10:42 PM Re: Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes [Re: Shannow]
FetchFar Offline


Registered: 10/17/13
Posts: 831
Loc: Colorado
shannow obviously didn't read the paper. His title here "Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes" is misleading at best. The paper is not a design paper at all. Its theorists at a university investigating how to model mixed-boundary lubrication in journal bearings, a simulation modelling exercise. Thats all.

In the real world of engines, we know that Mazda, Toyota, Ford, Honda, GM, Subaru, and now BMW (LL-14) all specify 20 weights with great success.


Edited by FetchFar (06/06/14 10:47 PM)
_________________________
'07 BMW 530xi N52 engine, E60 chassis, 255 hp
'11 Chevy Camaro LS, 3.6L V6, Zeta chassis, 312 hp
'40 Chevrolet Special Deluxe 2-Door Town Sedan

Top
#3391153 - 06/06/14 10:45 PM Re: Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes [Re: Shannow]
FetchFar Offline


Registered: 10/17/13
Posts: 831
Loc: Colorado
Originally Posted By: Shannow

Extrapolation from this is what the likes of Honda are showing, we are at the end of the diminishing returns with bearings, and any reduction in viscosity is leading to more mixed lubrication...so they are going thinner, while increasing their bearing projected areas, and reducing clearances...which increase drag, but also indicate that their gains are being made elsewhere (pistons, actual viscous pumping in galleries, dunno what else).


Really? "Extrapolation" from this paper? You mean your wild guess. Simulation modeling research, not design. Big difference.
_________________________
'07 BMW 530xi N52 engine, E60 chassis, 255 hp
'11 Chevy Camaro LS, 3.6L V6, Zeta chassis, 312 hp
'40 Chevrolet Special Deluxe 2-Door Town Sedan

Top
#3391379 - 06/07/14 10:03 AM Re: Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes [Re: FetchFar]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 14706
Loc: Iowegia
Originally Posted By: FetchFar
shannow obviously didn't read the paper. His title here "Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes" is misleading at best. The paper is not a design paper at all. Its theorists at a university investigating how to model mixed-boundary lubrication in journal bearings, a simulation modelling exercise. Thats all.

In the real world of engines, we know that Mazda, Toyota, Ford, Honda, GM, Subaru, and now BMW (LL-14) all specify 20 weights with great success.


Simulations are only as good as to how well they correlate with experimental results.

IE, simulations can only be believed or trusted if the simulation results do not deviate too far from real world results.

I don't think mechanical component designers have any choice wrt lubrication regimes in machines with widely varying loads.
_________________________
"How you see your future is much more important than what has happened in your past." Zig Ziglar smile

Top
#3391626 - 06/07/14 05:57 PM Re: Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes [Re: FetchFar]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 27096
Loc: a prison island
Originally Posted By: FetchFar
shannow obviously didn't read the paper. His title here "Why designers allow mixed lubrication regimes" is misleading at best. The paper is not a design paper at all. Its theorists at a university investigating how to model mixed-boundary lubrication in journal bearings, a simulation modelling exercise. Thats all.

In the real world of engines, we know that Mazda, Toyota, Ford, Honda, GM, Subaru, and now BMW (LL-14) all specify 20 weights with great success.


And they all do component by component simulations, mechanical and mathematical the determine just how far they can stretch the science.

e.g. Honda https://www.hondarandd.jp/point.php?pid=292&lang=en

Quote:
Proposal of New Bearing Simulation Rig Tester for High Efficiency Engine Bearing Development

To select bearing specifications for an engine using a bearing rig test, it is necessary to achieve sliding conditions that are near the actual operating conditions of the engine. A new bearing rig tester with low resonance and high rigidity permits high frequency excitation and has a mechanism to correct misalignment between the axle and the bearing. This rig tester can reproduce load fluctuations under the actual operating conditions of the engine. The test equipment makes it possible to clarify for the first time the mechanism that causes the difference in the break-in performance of lead alloy and aluminum alloy bearings. It was possible to evaluate the small end bearing fitted on an actual connecting rod, and the sliding characteristics caused by different surface treatment methods for the small end bearings. In addition, it was possible to measure the friction coefficient of the bearings with high repeatability, and efficiently evaluate the bearing material.


There's a whole lot more to machine design...as you (may) well understand, often you have to break machines down component to component to understand specific behaviours...the Honda rig goes further, in allowing the journal to tilt, and thus model crankshaft misalignment/flexibility.

It not just making a statement that I have a Stribeck number of 0.4...or is that 1...heck, or I don't even know what the loads are, but here's a number that I like.

As to my statement, it's not misleading.

the 20, in minor mixed lubrication had significantly lower friction than the 40, in both the test bench and the mathematical model...even 'though the 20 had some mixed lubrication.

Honda have said in their 16 papers that they are operating at times in mixed mode, but still have "adequate" durability...in the paper linked, on a motored L13 Honda engine (another test method commonly used to gain understanding of behaviours), the thing goes undergoes mixed lubrication conditions at 1,500 RPM...with out combustion pressure being added.

https://www.hondarandd.jp/point.php?pid=72&lang=en

You are so committed to proving others wrong, that you are losing sight of the ball.

Top