Originally Posted By: Mystic
This has been discussed over and over again and anybody who is interested can do some research. So I am not going into all of this again. But I will say this: One guy, using a compression tester of unknown quality, is NOT SCIENTIFIC PROOF! Science is much more strict than that. If we were going to try to use compression testing to prove or disprove that a product works, we would need very high quality compression testing equipment and a team of unbiased researchers to do the testing. Not one guy who believes in a product doing compression testing with a compression tester of unknown quality. Anybody here at this website who has taken college chemistry and physics classes (like I have) knows that science requires strict testing procedures.
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Your stance has been attacking certain people posting anecdotal evidence, then wanting proof to back up their claims. Can you explain how someone proves a product works to your satisfaction, a product that you dislike? You are familiar with that concept aren't you?
Its a real pity that dnewton, one of the biggest contributors to this site, someone willing to share his scientific testing with this forum, someone who does statistical process quality control for a living, someone who works hard to advance our understanding of maintenance, has his name impugned over and over again.
If you're going to make comments and apply standards to others, be consistent in how and who you do it to. Eg what would you say to this if you were being consistent with your philosophy?
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
MMO is an old well proven product.
It doesn't fix broken parts. It can't clean out an entire engine that's heavily sludged. But it has its place in a large arsenal of products.
AutoRX is a nuclear bomb by comparison. That stuff is miraculous