Recent Topics
Oil Recommendation for a 1966 Ford F100
by Death_Eagle_571
03/26/15 09:58 PM
Squeeze all the life out of your oil?
by oliveoil
03/26/15 09:32 PM
Nice patina!
by hotwheels
03/26/15 09:24 PM
diff and brake fluids for bmw x3
by ryan2022
03/26/15 09:02 PM
QS Defy 10w40 5q/$15.97
by armos
03/26/15 08:43 PM
Mopar atf+3 type 7176
by charmer37
03/26/15 08:15 PM
Rotella T5
by beanoil
03/26/15 08:09 PM
power steering fluid
by charmer37
03/26/15 08:08 PM
Can someone identify a part for Stihl KM110R
by henni
03/26/15 08:06 PM
Oil for Audi 12V on LPG
by Guybrush
03/26/15 07:47 PM
Oil recommendation for 84 Caprice
by RyanCreasia
03/26/15 07:25 PM
Anyone Use Dorman Trans Pan on Ford 4r70w?
by AjsGarage
03/26/15 07:05 PM
Newest Members
Death_Eagle_571, andx0r, macdzich, rospaw, rwwhiz
53331 Registered Users
Who's Online
85 registered (2010_FX4, 1kickbuttranger, 01_celica_gt, 01rangerxl, 2004tdigls, 9 invisible), 1389 Guests and 176 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
53331 Members
66 Forums
228737 Topics
3654831 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 7 of 10 < 1 2 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 >
Topic Options
#3384275 - 05/29/14 07:34 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: Trajan]
Mystic Online   content


Registered: 03/05/03
Posts: 7955
Loc: Colorado
Like demarpaint I am done at this post. I have been proactive and I think the attacks that may well have been coming may not come right away.

But if somebody attacks me personally because of my age, because of what news program I watch (free country), or other personal reasons I will notify moderators.

There should be discussion at this website but not personal attacks.

Top
#3384280 - 05/29/14 07:40 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
keesue Offline


Registered: 05/27/07
Posts: 99
Loc: San Francisco
Oh, my...

And now back to Archoil? Post count is coming up!!! (Back to the bushes)


Edited by keesue (05/29/14 07:41 PM)
_________________________
1981 Turbo Volvo with over 313,000 miles (bought new)
2001 S60-T5 Volvo

Top
#3384292 - 05/29/14 07:47 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: Mystic]
Sam2000 Offline


Registered: 03/25/14
Posts: 400
Loc: Nevada
Originally Posted By: Mystic
I think the attacks that may well have been coming may not come right away.


That's great to hear!

Top
#3384413 - 05/29/14 09:39 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
Vikas Offline


Registered: 07/22/05
Posts: 8717
Loc: NorthEast
Can we get back to your Maserati/Ferrari/Bugati purchase? I forgot exactly which one you were contemplating but apparently you have not yet purchased it. Or were you putting us on?

Top
#3384704 - 05/30/14 08:33 AM Re: tried archoil [Re: keesue]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 3284
Loc: Upper Midwest
As usual in additive threads, there isn't much to get back to. So far it has consisted of:

Quote:
it has been about 1000 miles and fuel mileage is now 19.3 mpg [was 19.1]

this is not scientific

engine seems smoother but that does not mean much

not sure if i would buy it again


Originally Posted By: keesue
And now back to Archoil?


What part of that are we getting back to?
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 193K
1996 Honda Accord, 207K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 318K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 233K

Top
#3384842 - 05/30/14 12:04 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
keesue Offline


Registered: 05/27/07
Posts: 99
Loc: San Francisco
The reports from the OP who used it and started the thread to share his experience? Assuming he would even want to update his thread, I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't given the reception.


Edited by keesue (05/30/14 12:19 PM)
_________________________
1981 Turbo Volvo with over 313,000 miles (bought new)
2001 S60-T5 Volvo

Top
#3384878 - 05/30/14 12:33 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
keesue Offline


Registered: 05/27/07
Posts: 99
Loc: San Francisco
Fireman1073, welcome to the forum and welcome to the foxhole. I appreciated you posting your initial experience and eager to hear your follow up, if any. There are some good posters here with a wealth of experience with additives so it has been a good resource for me over the years. I found a few products I use that work well.

All the best. I can send you my bullet-proof vest and Kevlar Helmut if you decide to post again. I have 66 posts in 7 years so I have kept my head down and don't need them. :-)

Back to clandestine mode...
_________________________
1981 Turbo Volvo with over 313,000 miles (bought new)
2001 S60-T5 Volvo

Top
#3384882 - 05/30/14 12:38 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
panthermike Offline


Registered: 04/01/08
Posts: 3194
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

If I was truly going to run mpg numbers though, I wouldn't use this truck. I just don't drive it enough. Not sure I would want to try it in the Mazda or Honda, but would share my observations if I do. Trying Ceratec in the truck on the next OCI.
_________________________
'10 Mazda 6; Napa Syn 5w20 + AR9100 37K mi
'15 Lincoln MKC; FF 100 mi
'77 F250 "Ol Yeller"; Kendall GT1 20w50/Mos2


Top
#3384910 - 05/30/14 01:28 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: panthermike]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 3284
Loc: Upper Midwest
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 193K
1996 Honda Accord, 207K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 318K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 233K

Top
#3385091 - 05/30/14 05:58 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: kschachn]
fireman1073 Offline


Registered: 02/03/06
Posts: 20
Loc: ma
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

256 color spectrorectumanalyzermoonbeamology with contrast device

still not good enough for you though smile

Top
#3385100 - 05/30/14 06:08 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: fireman1073
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

256 color spectrorectumanalyzermoonbeamology with contrast device

still not good enough for you though smile


Not good enough for me! You should have used a turboencabulator (or a retroencabulator for an n/a truck).
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3385233 - 05/30/14 08:44 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 3284
Loc: Upper Midwest
Well, I was only asking. I assumed you were using your annual emissions test results but I didn't know - hence my question.

By your response I can only conclude there was no method? One makes a claim so you expect there was a reason, but maybe not.

Originally Posted By: fireman1073
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

256 color spectrorectumanalyzermoonbeamology with contrast device

still not good enough for you though smile
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 193K
1996 Honda Accord, 207K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 318K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 233K

Top
#3385253 - 05/30/14 09:23 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: kschachn]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3540
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Well, I was only asking. I assumed you were using your annual emissions test results but I didn't know - hence my question.

By your response I can only conclude there was no method? One makes a claim so you expect there was a reason, but maybe not.

Originally Posted By: fireman1073
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

256 color spectrorectumanalyzermoonbeamology with contrast device

still not good enough for you though smile


The one who made the claim hasn't responded yet smile

PA emission testing is either pass or fail. Both visual and functional inspection.
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Domino's is a good name for a pizza place but a bad name for a construction company.

Top
#3385262 - 05/30/14 09:33 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: Trajan]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 3284
Loc: Upper Midwest
Oops, you're right.

Rewind that.

Originally Posted By: Trajan
The one who made the claim hasn't responded yet smile

PA emission testing is either pass or fail. Both visual and functional inspection.
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 193K
1996 Honda Accord, 207K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 318K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 233K

Top
#3385295 - 05/30/14 10:17 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: kschachn]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3540
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Oops, you're right.

Rewind that.

Originally Posted By: Trajan
The one who made the claim hasn't responded yet smile

PA emission testing is either pass or fail. Both visual and functional inspection.


I wanted to add, that for my model year and where I live, the above is valid. (Just an OBD test and gas cap check and things like "Does he have cats installed?" The 1994 I once had was a bit more extensive. smile

http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/vei/tech.html for Arizona.


Edited by Trajan (05/30/14 10:18 PM)
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Domino's is a good name for a pizza place but a bad name for a construction company.

Top
Page 7 of 10 < 1 2 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 >