Recent Topics
Mossberg 500A
by Hokiefyd
09/22/14 11:00 AM
Penn Plat 5W20 13k OCI Honda Ridgeline
by thooks
09/22/14 10:58 AM
unpiloted landing in a field
by raaizin
09/22/14 10:28 AM
Toro 621 or 721 Single Stage
by Ope_Freak
09/22/14 10:18 AM
BMW coolant
by raaizin
09/22/14 09:57 AM
Duralast Gold batteries - Auto Zone
by reemoe2
09/22/14 09:51 AM
Off to LA: 50th anniversary, "Man from U.N.C.L.E."
by Benzadmiral
09/22/14 09:27 AM
Dolmar 421 starting problems
by ET16
09/22/14 09:18 AM
lubeguard?
by buck91
09/22/14 08:16 AM
UOA - Amsoil SS 0W-30 in '13 Ecoboost with 40,792
by latapx
09/22/14 07:45 AM
0w20 in Toyota 4.7 (2005)
by DirtyMoe21
09/22/14 07:38 AM
Serpentine belt noise
by supton
09/22/14 07:27 AM
Newest Members
MikeF, jim1224, Wompem, Dlauth, ToddT58
51371 Registered Users
Who's Online
104 registered (01_celica_gt, 29662, ARCOgraphite, 97tbird, 147_Grain, 6 invisible), 1869 Guests and 230 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51371 Members
64 Forums
219629 Topics
3466399 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 7 of 10 < 1 2 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 >
Topic Options
#3384275 - 05/29/14 07:34 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: Trajan]
Mystic Offline


Registered: 03/05/03
Posts: 7439
Loc: Colorado
Like demarpaint I am done at this post. I have been proactive and I think the attacks that may well have been coming may not come right away.

But if somebody attacks me personally because of my age, because of what news program I watch (free country), or other personal reasons I will notify moderators.

There should be discussion at this website but not personal attacks.

Top
#3384280 - 05/29/14 07:40 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
keesue Offline


Registered: 05/27/07
Posts: 95
Loc: San Francisco
Oh, my...

And now back to Archoil? Post count is coming up!!! (Back to the bushes)


Edited by keesue (05/29/14 07:41 PM)
_________________________
1981 Turbo Volvo with over 313,000 miles (bought new)
2001 S60-T5 Volvo

Top
#3384292 - 05/29/14 07:47 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: Mystic]
Sam2000 Offline


Registered: 03/25/14
Posts: 400
Loc: Nevada
Originally Posted By: Mystic
I think the attacks that may well have been coming may not come right away.


That's great to hear!

Top
#3384413 - 05/29/14 09:39 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
Vikas Offline


Registered: 07/22/05
Posts: 8106
Loc: NorthEast
Can we get back to your Maserati/Ferrari/Bugati purchase? I forgot exactly which one you were contemplating but apparently you have not yet purchased it. Or were you putting us on?

Top
#3384704 - 05/30/14 08:33 AM Re: tried archoil [Re: keesue]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 2572
Loc: Upper Midwest
As usual in additive threads, there isn't much to get back to. So far it has consisted of:

Quote:
it has been about 1000 miles and fuel mileage is now 19.3 mpg [was 19.1]

this is not scientific

engine seems smoother but that does not mean much

not sure if i would buy it again


Originally Posted By: keesue
And now back to Archoil?


What part of that are we getting back to?
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 189K
1996 Honda Accord, 203K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 304K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 224K

Top
#3384842 - 05/30/14 12:04 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
keesue Offline


Registered: 05/27/07
Posts: 95
Loc: San Francisco
The reports from the OP who used it and started the thread to share his experience? Assuming he would even want to update his thread, I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't given the reception.


Edited by keesue (05/30/14 12:19 PM)
_________________________
1981 Turbo Volvo with over 313,000 miles (bought new)
2001 S60-T5 Volvo

Top
#3384878 - 05/30/14 12:33 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
keesue Offline


Registered: 05/27/07
Posts: 95
Loc: San Francisco
Fireman1073, welcome to the forum and welcome to the foxhole. I appreciated you posting your initial experience and eager to hear your follow up, if any. There are some good posters here with a wealth of experience with additives so it has been a good resource for me over the years. I found a few products I use that work well.

All the best. I can send you my bullet-proof vest and Kevlar Helmut if you decide to post again. I have 66 posts in 7 years so I have kept my head down and don't need them. :-)

Back to clandestine mode...
_________________________
1981 Turbo Volvo with over 313,000 miles (bought new)
2001 S60-T5 Volvo

Top
#3384882 - 05/30/14 12:38 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
panthermike Offline


Registered: 04/01/08
Posts: 3165
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

If I was truly going to run mpg numbers though, I wouldn't use this truck. I just don't drive it enough. Not sure I would want to try it in the Mazda or Honda, but would share my observations if I do. Trying Ceratec in the truck on the next OCI.
_________________________
'10 Mazda 6; QSUD 5w20 + Ceratec/MC Filter 31K mi
'12 Civic; PP 0w20 + LG Biotech/Fram Ultra 30K mi
'77 F250 "Ol Yeller"; Delvac/RL Mix +AR9100


Top
#3384910 - 05/30/14 01:28 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: panthermike]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 2572
Loc: Upper Midwest
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 189K
1996 Honda Accord, 203K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 304K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 224K

Top
#3385091 - 05/30/14 05:58 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: kschachn]
fireman1073 Offline


Registered: 02/03/06
Posts: 19
Loc: ma
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

256 color spectrorectumanalyzermoonbeamology with contrast device

still not good enough for you though smile

Top
#3385100 - 05/30/14 06:08 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 626
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: fireman1073
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

256 color spectrorectumanalyzermoonbeamology with contrast device

still not good enough for you though smile


Not good enough for me! You should have used a turboencabulator (or a retroencabulator for an n/a truck).
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3385233 - 05/30/14 08:44 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: fireman1073]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 2572
Loc: Upper Midwest
Well, I was only asking. I assumed you were using your annual emissions test results but I didn't know - hence my question.

By your response I can only conclude there was no method? One makes a claim so you expect there was a reason, but maybe not.

Originally Posted By: fireman1073
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

256 color spectrorectumanalyzermoonbeamology with contrast device

still not good enough for you though smile
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 189K
1996 Honda Accord, 203K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 304K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 224K

Top
#3385253 - 05/30/14 09:23 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: kschachn]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3314
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Well, I was only asking. I assumed you were using your annual emissions test results but I didn't know - hence my question.

By your response I can only conclude there was no method? One makes a claim so you expect there was a reason, but maybe not.

Originally Posted By: fireman1073
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Can you tell us how that was measured?

Originally Posted By: panthermike
I currently have the Archoil 9100 in my old truck. My reason for usage was to try and lower emission levels, which it did to some degree(with both 9100 in oil and 6200 in gas). However, on all other claims I can't say I have noticed anything else. Truck runs well(as it did before), gets terrible mpg(as it did before).

256 color spectrorectumanalyzermoonbeamology with contrast device

still not good enough for you though smile


The one who made the claim hasn't responded yet smile

PA emission testing is either pass or fail. Both visual and functional inspection.
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Top
#3385262 - 05/30/14 09:33 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: Trajan]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 2572
Loc: Upper Midwest
Oops, you're right.

Rewind that.

Originally Posted By: Trajan
The one who made the claim hasn't responded yet smile

PA emission testing is either pass or fail. Both visual and functional inspection.
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 189K
1996 Honda Accord, 203K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 304K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 224K

Top
#3385295 - 05/30/14 10:17 PM Re: tried archoil [Re: kschachn]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3314
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Oops, you're right.

Rewind that.

Originally Posted By: Trajan
The one who made the claim hasn't responded yet smile

PA emission testing is either pass or fail. Both visual and functional inspection.


I wanted to add, that for my model year and where I live, the above is valid. (Just an OBD test and gas cap check and things like "Does he have cats installed?" The 1994 I once had was a bit more extensive. smile

http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/vei/tech.html for Arizona.


Edited by Trajan (05/30/14 10:18 PM)
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Top
Page 7 of 10 < 1 2 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 >