quote:
Lets assume he is in bypass during starup. It is possible, no?
Do you mean relief?? or bypass? (I use them in the wrong place at times).
edit to address your full post, Winston
Well, I'm usure what you're saying here. Are we assuming a "given" that he's in bypass at startup for supposition's sake? Is it possible? Sure, anything is possilbe. Should we assume anything beyond a manipulated "what if" ..no. That is, we shouldn't give this "assumption" any further weight in validity in the absense of bona fide proof.
Start up noise, traditionally, is that first few seconds. Anything beyond that has to be viewed as a design or mechanical defect that you are compensating for. This can hardly be viewed as (would canon be an appropriate term?) doctrine. This is a matter of "I have this situation ..and this appeared to solve it". We don't know the situtation ..only what appeared to relieve it. There are countless apparent cause and effects that cirucumvent much intermediate terrain in forming conclusions.
end edit
If we're talking filter bypass ...nope. I don't think so. Very rare in the early life of a filter. Even with a dense media like PureOne. This should not be altered by your oil volume or this or that. That is, in all cases, a filter should be a filter and flow should be flow. If my testing progresses like it has ...the filter would merely advance in PSID until it is bypassing oil in a progressive manner. This issue/feature, standing alone, won't alter flow.
As far as oil pumps routinely going into relief? I can't see anything to make me believe this is so ..and that's in spite of having a vehicle with an aftermarket high volume pump that is in relief 100% of the time it is off idle hot. Or rather the only time it's not in relief is hot idle. My oil pressure is peaked 100% of the time. It is higher than it was without the HV oil pump. So my flow may vary ..but it always higher than it was stock.
Ugly3 has rhetoric from an oil pump manufacturer that asserts that it's in relief above 3000 rpm ..but if any user of the pump isn't at his cold peak PSI @ 3000 rpm ...he ain't in relief.
My jeeps have a factory relief of 75 ..but a stock peak pressure of 42-45. They should never see relief ...ever ...unless I use 70 weight oil @-40
The relief's primary feature in most engines is not to limit oil flow per se~. It's to limit the max stress that they see. The non-traditional crank driven oil pumps don't have as many issues with this as our disappearing distributor driven types. This could surely alter the criteria of where a manufacturer sets a relief ..and the volume that they "dial in" for a given rpm.
(now these next two paragraphs may appear in conflict ..but think "outcomes")
I'm sure someone could come up with a valid reason for it ..but I'm hard pressed to think of why an OEM manufacturer would design a lubrication system that routinely went into unpredictible territory by going into relief other than as a "fringe" limiting factor. It's a safety ..a, by definition, limit. To think that it's a common occurance would be hard for me to understand.
Now an OEM could, as with my HV installation, just put in an over sized pump and let it be perpetually in relief. This would work. The user, with or without a gauge would have a constant pressure that would translate to adaquate flow under all circumstances. That is, 25 psi (corresponding to a flow spec) post filter would be adaquate ..regulate it to 40 100% of the time ...regardless of conditions ..more flow is present post filter than is needed 24/7/365. Again, while flow may be altered ..where can harm come from it? Even reliefs have limits to the amount that they can shunt in extreme situation. If it's too cold my HV oil pump will produce in excess of 58psi briefly.
Again ..that wouldn't mean that relief operations are a "bad thing".
No matter what road I take on this ..I come to the same basic location. It doesn't take me in another direction. I'm open for going elsewhere ..but I've go bona fide evidence that's dragging me in this direction and would need/like to see qualitative and authoritative evidence that not only asserted otherwise ..it would also have to "well, yes, you're right ..but.." ..otherwise ...it's as bogus (subjectively slanted) as some appear to view some of my views (see what I mean?).
[ May 28, 2005, 09:26 AM: Message edited by: Gary Allan ]