Recent Topics
'01 Toyota 3.0: oil to clean up sludge?
by HawkeyeScott
5 minutes 27 seconds ago
What is the purpose of a 4.4 litre oil container?
by vitez
14 minutes 58 seconds ago
Cut Open: Nissan OEM, Bosch D3300 & Mobil M1-110
by davison0976
33 minutes 2 seconds ago
Briggs and stratton flathead?
by pdxglocker9mm
44 minutes 14 seconds ago
Charcoal
by dlundblad
Today at 09:43 PM
2013 Dodge Dart: replace AF on miles or time?
by vitez
Today at 09:20 PM
Rotella T5 10w30 or QSUD 5w30
by GumbyJarvis
Today at 09:04 PM
People running thru red lights. You ever follow th
by motor_oil_madman
Today at 08:30 PM
747-400 versus 747-8
by mjoekingz28
Today at 08:22 PM
14psi bypass pressure for small engines?
by motor_oil_madman
Today at 07:47 PM
'13 Wrangler 2.5" lift
by JXW
Today at 07:37 PM
group 7 v6128 ford 6.7 7k miles
by robo339
Today at 07:34 PM
Newest Members
myfarmertan, coachvonyo, ionix, Amtecol, DRAX392
57779 Registered Users
Who's Online
77 registered (2015_PSD, barkingspider, 901Memphis, aquariuscsm, 10 invisible), 1212 Guests and 101 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
57779 Members
66 Forums
248434 Topics
4062739 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3379546 - 05/23/14 07:47 PM Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment?
JerryBob Offline


Registered: 04/11/13
Posts: 868
Loc: Colorado
I was perusing a Toyota Tacoma site and noticed that some guys upgraded their 4-Cyl by purchasing after-market exhaust headers (HERE) . They claim to get more power and better mpg.

So, other than the obvious issue of $450, I am wondering why these wouldn't be standard equipment, or at least optional? I know there is a downside (reduced filtration) to putting on a K&N racing filter on the intake side, but is there any cost (other than dollars) to putting headers on the exhaust side?

Auto manufacturers seem to go to great lengths to increase their CAFE mileage. Why not use headers?
_________________________
Certified Filter Cutter - License #F-23567 Expires 12/2019

Top
#3379550 - 05/23/14 07:50 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
DragRace Offline


Registered: 11/27/06
Posts: 2327
Loc: 1/4 Mile Track
Most dealerships dont like modifications of any kind.


Top
#3379551 - 05/23/14 07:51 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 4576
Loc: USA
Noise.Tinny headers don't insulate valvetrain sounds like cast iron or thicker designs do.

Top
#3379555 - 05/23/14 07:54 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
901Memphis Online   content


Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 10613
Loc: Northern Kentucky
Noise, durability, cost. Cast iron works.
_________________________
2002 Buick Century 125k - Built 4T65e(Maxlife) - M1 0w40 /Fram Ultra XG 3387A
1998 Nissan Altima 335k - 5MT - M1 HM 5w30/Fram Ultra XG7317+MOS+ATP 205

Top
#3379561 - 05/23/14 08:05 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 8031
Loc: Florida
Headers dissipate heat more quickly than iron manifolds, and that can lead to slow cat light off times. Also, that extra heat may harm things under the hood in a car not built for it.

Mazda found a way around this when they created the CX-5. Search for a picture, and you will see. They gained the advantage of 4-2-1 headers without comprising cat light off time.

Some cars left the factory with pipes that are similar to headers. The 2.2 and 2.3 engine found in Honda Accords are built that way.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3379573 - 05/23/14 08:29 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 24790
Loc: NY
Some compaines are incorporating the exhaust mainfold into the cylinder head, like the Chrysler Pentastar engine. I guess it cuts down on weight and costs. It would be impossible to install headers on that type of engine.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3379575 - 05/23/14 08:35 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 31386
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Some cars come with headers from the factory. Many don't. The 302HO in the 80's came equipped with factory headers (albeit, not very good ones) and many hi-po cars come with them factory like my M5 which has 4-2-1 headers stock.

As others have noted, cast iron is the most common manifold material because of its good heat retention, durability and low cost of manufacture.
_________________________
02 Expedition
06 Charger R/T
14 Charger SRT-8

Top
#3379582 - 05/23/14 08:44 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
FXjohn Offline


Registered: 05/25/07
Posts: 1236
Loc: NE Indiana
too many headaches in the long run

Top
#3379584 - 05/23/14 08:46 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 7180
Loc: CT
Hi end cars do.


Top
#3379590 - 05/23/14 08:49 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: hattaresguy]
JerryBob Offline


Registered: 04/11/13
Posts: 868
Loc: Colorado
Originally Posted By: hattaresguy
Hi end cars do.






That's about 3 times the number of cylinders that I have.... grin
_________________________
Certified Filter Cutter - License #F-23567 Expires 12/2019

Top
#3379591 - 05/23/14 08:50 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
circuitsmith Offline


Registered: 12/17/09
Posts: 350
Loc: Wash, DC
Why no headers?
Cost. Noise. Emissions. Durability.

Thin walled tube headers are more involved to produce and use more expensive metal than a cast header.

Tube headers make more noise under the hood as well as at the tailpipe end.
Most car buyers (especially over 30 y.o.) don't want all that noise.

Tube headers extract and cool the exhaust gases from the cylinder more quickly.
That increases HC emissions and makes the cat converter take more time to warm up.
They can also raise under hood temps.

Modern cast manifolds are far better than the "log" manifolds of yesteryear.
_________________________
2006 Toyota Matrix 5-sp. 1zz-fe 5000mi/12mo OCI
Any major brand dino 5w-30 on sale

Top
#3379612 - 05/23/14 09:25 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
Mr Nice Offline


Registered: 09/12/04
Posts: 16460
Loc: Orlando, FL
I would put headers on a V-8 for performance but not spend that $$$ on a 4 cylinder engine.
_________________________
2007 Civic EX
2006 Accord SE
2005 RSX base
2005 Civic LX

Top
#3379623 - 05/23/14 09:52 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
Kiwi_ME Offline


Registered: 10/24/08
Posts: 1019
Loc: New Zealand
Amusing the interest in V8s with headers given that most high-volume V8 designs have 360 degree cranks and therefore uneven firing per bank. Same issue with V6s. Whatever good headers do, it's not going to be the same for every cylinder.

Not a problem with the in-line three, four or six however, and many smaller naturally-aspirated fours do have nicely-welded tubular designs.

Top
#3379643 - 05/23/14 10:30 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3681
Loc: ks, wichita
WHY? cause car makers make cars ONLY good enough.

Top
#3379653 - 05/23/14 10:42 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
ddtmoto Offline


Registered: 12/20/09
Posts: 262
Loc: Utah
2011+ 5.0 Mustang also have stainless headers. Quad cam heads are too wide tho, can't really see the headers. Dang...
_________________________
Mustang GT 5.0 Brembo '11
ram 5.9
TL1000S
GSXR1000
DRZ400E
'09 GTZ1400 Concours

Top
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >