Recent Topics
blown engine
by meme6885
07/29/14 11:52 PM
Oil change tommorow
by Samf333
07/29/14 11:25 PM
Anti-Oxidants
by MolaKule
07/29/14 11:09 PM
Autozone full synthetic 5w-30
by lawman1909
07/29/14 09:14 PM
Battery change in Prius
by tig1
07/29/14 09:11 PM
Wierd Diesel Generator Cylinder Damage.
by Lewis
07/29/14 08:48 PM
Barbecueing at a gas station
by y_p_w
07/29/14 08:22 PM
Reading spark plugs. Too hot?
by italian68
07/29/14 07:46 PM
Need basement bulkhead ideas
by eljefino
07/29/14 07:38 PM
Champion Brands 5W-20 Synthetic Blend $2.46 qt
by Warstud
07/29/14 07:31 PM
Ford motorcraft Full synthetic 5 W 20
by kensley
07/29/14 07:30 PM
Mobil1 ESP 5W30, 4,350mi VW Tiguan 2.0TSI
by edyvw
07/29/14 06:27 PM
Newest Members
sacamano, handy, amber, joenintiesc, jjs1235
50798 Registered Users
Who's Online
55 registered (bdcardinal, Bandito440, 123Saab, abycat, 29662, 7 invisible), 1112 Guests and 221 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
50798 Members
64 Forums
217016 Topics
3416863 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3379546 - 05/23/14 07:47 PM Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment?
JerryBob Offline


Registered: 04/11/13
Posts: 388
Loc: Washington, DC
I was perusing a Toyota Tacoma site and noticed that some guys upgraded their 4-Cyl by purchasing after-market exhaust headers (HERE) . They claim to get more power and better mpg.

So, other than the obvious issue of $450, I am wondering why these wouldn't be standard equipment, or at least optional? I know there is a downside (reduced filtration) to putting on a K&N racing filter on the intake side, but is there any cost (other than dollars) to putting headers on the exhaust side?

Auto manufacturers seem to go to great lengths to increase their CAFE mileage. Why not use headers?
_________________________
2002 Honda Odyssey Valvoline Synpower 0w20 Fram XG Filter
2011 Toyota Tacoma TGMO 0w20 M1-102 Filter

Top
#3379550 - 05/23/14 07:50 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
DragRace Offline


Registered: 11/27/06
Posts: 2327
Loc: 1/4 Mile Track
Most dealerships dont like modifications of any kind.


Top
#3379551 - 05/23/14 07:51 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
NHGUY Offline


Registered: 10/09/11
Posts: 3249
Loc: USA
Noise.Tinny headers don't insulate valvetrain sounds like cast iron or thicker designs do.

Top
#3379555 - 05/23/14 07:54 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
901Memphis Online   content


Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 4895
Loc: Northern Kentucky
Noise, durability, cost. Cast iron works.
_________________________
1999 Ford Taurus 145k (Vulcan v6) - Mobil 1 High Mileage 5w30 | FL400S
2002 Buick Century 102k - PU 5w30 / Fram Ultra XG 3980 / Filter mag

Top
#3379561 - 05/23/14 08:05 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 6572
Loc: Florida
Headers dissipate heat more quickly than iron manifolds, and that can lead to slow cat light off times. Also, that extra heat may harm things under the hood in a car not built for it.

Mazda found a way around this when they created the CX-5. Search for a picture, and you will see. They gained the advantage of 4-2-1 headers without comprising cat light off time.

Some cars left the factory with pipes that are similar to headers. The 2.2 and 2.3 engine found in Honda Accords are built that way.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3379573 - 05/23/14 08:29 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 20752
Loc: NY
Some compaines are incorporating the exhaust mainfold into the cylinder head, like the Chrysler Pentastar engine. I guess it cuts down on weight and costs. It would be impossible to install headers on that type of engine.
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops!


Top
#3379575 - 05/23/14 08:35 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 25671
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Some cars come with headers from the factory. Many don't. The 302HO in the 80's came equipped with factory headers (albeit, not very good ones) and many hi-po cars come with them factory like my M5 which has 4-2-1 headers stock.

As others have noted, cast iron is the most common manifold material because of its good heat retention, durability and low cost of manufacture.
_________________________
Network Engineer
02 Expedition
01 BMW ///M5
05 Forester XT

Top
#3379582 - 05/23/14 08:44 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
FXjohn Offline


Registered: 05/25/07
Posts: 1149
Loc: NE Indiana
too many headaches in the long run

Top
#3379584 - 05/23/14 08:46 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 4871
Loc: CT
Hi end cars do.


Top
#3379590 - 05/23/14 08:49 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: hattaresguy]
JerryBob Offline


Registered: 04/11/13
Posts: 388
Loc: Washington, DC
Originally Posted By: hattaresguy
Hi end cars do.






That's about 3 times the number of cylinders that I have.... grin
_________________________
2002 Honda Odyssey Valvoline Synpower 0w20 Fram XG Filter
2011 Toyota Tacoma TGMO 0w20 M1-102 Filter

Top
#3379591 - 05/23/14 08:50 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
circuitsmith Offline


Registered: 12/17/09
Posts: 140
Loc: Wash, DC
Why no headers?
Cost. Noise. Emissions. Durability.

Thin walled tube headers are more involved to produce and use more expensive metal than a cast header.

Tube headers make more noise under the hood as well as at the tailpipe end.
Most car buyers (especially over 30 y.o.) don't want all that noise.

Tube headers extract and cool the exhaust gases from the cylinder more quickly.
That increases HC emissions and makes the cat converter take more time to warm up.
They can also raise under hood temps.

Modern cast manifolds are far better than the "log" manifolds of yesteryear.
_________________________
2006 Toyota Matrix 5-sp. 5000mi/12mo OCI
Any major brand dino 5w-30 on sale

Top
#3379612 - 05/23/14 09:25 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
LT4 Vette Offline


Registered: 09/12/04
Posts: 12102
Loc: USA
I would put headers on a V-8 for performance but not spend that $$$ on a 4 cylinder engine.

Top
#3379623 - 05/23/14 09:52 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
Kiwi_ME Offline


Registered: 10/24/08
Posts: 650
Loc: New Zealand
Amusing the interest in V8s with headers given that most high-volume V8 designs have 360 degree cranks and therefore uneven firing per bank. Same issue with V6s. Whatever good headers do, it's not going to be the same for every cylinder.

Not a problem with the in-line three, four or six however, and many smaller naturally-aspirated fours do have nicely-welded tubular designs.

Top
#3379643 - 05/23/14 10:30 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
morris Offline


Registered: 08/24/08
Posts: 3657
Loc: ks, wichita
WHY? cause car makers make cars ONLY good enough.

Top
#3379653 - 05/23/14 10:42 PM Re: Why Aren't Headers Standard Equipment? [Re: JerryBob]
ddtmoto Offline


Registered: 12/20/09
Posts: 224
Loc: Utah
2011+ 5.0 Mustang also have stainless headers. Quad cam heads are too wide tho, can't really see the headers. Dang...
_________________________
Mustang GT 5.0 Brembo '11
ram 5.9
TL1000S
GSXR1000
DRZ400E
'09 GTZ1400 Concours

Top
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >