More specifically, in liquid cooled engines..
I read a lot here how people say something like "oh you live in Florida.. you could get away with running say a 5w30 vs a 5w20. Granted the thicker oil wont hurt anything, but take away a split frog hairs worth of fuel economy (and maybe void a warranty). I just feel the reasoning (air temperature) is wrong. Am I missing something?
And just to explain myself better, if I drove say an oil consuming Chrysler 3.8 in Florida, I would be more inclined to run a 15w40 year round rather than the specified 5w20 if I lived in say an Indiana climate.. only because it would slow consumption while taking the engine less time to get the oil to operating temp. This reasoning is based off of consumption.. not protection against wear.
The way I see it, thicker weights aid consumption.. not offer better protection in heat. Am I correct?
I read a lot here how people say something like "oh you live in Florida.. you could get away with running say a 5w30 vs a 5w20. Granted the thicker oil wont hurt anything, but take away a split frog hairs worth of fuel economy (and maybe void a warranty). I just feel the reasoning (air temperature) is wrong. Am I missing something?
And just to explain myself better, if I drove say an oil consuming Chrysler 3.8 in Florida, I would be more inclined to run a 15w40 year round rather than the specified 5w20 if I lived in say an Indiana climate.. only because it would slow consumption while taking the engine less time to get the oil to operating temp. This reasoning is based off of consumption.. not protection against wear.
The way I see it, thicker weights aid consumption.. not offer better protection in heat. Am I correct?
Last edited: