Recent Topics
Mobil 1 or Castrol edge?
by sky06
05/05/16 09:48 PM
1 piece lug nut recommendations?
by dlundblad
05/05/16 09:07 PM
1996 Chrysler Coolant
by outoforder
05/05/16 09:02 PM
Hat Tip to RMEuropean
by sleddriver
05/05/16 08:54 PM
Toro OHV considered flat tappet type...
by Duffyjr
05/05/16 08:48 PM
Tire Rack now carries the Falken Azenis RT615k
by slacktide_bitog
05/05/16 07:30 PM
Walmart now carries Nokian tires
by slacktide_bitog
05/05/16 07:16 PM
Heater Core Leak?
by bprat318
05/05/16 06:54 PM
R2C air filters
by Srt20
05/05/16 05:55 PM
Mobil 5000 observations
by tojo1968
05/05/16 05:32 PM
Puro Classics still at WM for 75Cents
by GumbyJarvis
05/05/16 05:09 PM
NAPA Gold start-up clatter
by AZjeff
05/05/16 04:44 PM
Newest Members
02Maxima, xlittoninjax, Jamer, johaiti, Danielbaja
57803 Registered Users
Who's Online
84 registered (2015_PSD, 87sammy, 06AllAmerican, 19jacobob93, 69GTX, 2k4_8, 8 invisible), 0 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
57803 Members
66 Forums
248532 Topics
4064827 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3361096 - 05/03/14 11:28 PM tests and case studies of archoil
boxcartommie22 Offline


Registered: 01/03/03
Posts: 3061
Loc: moutain country
_________________________
2001 Lincoln Conti,RL,K&N,SS Filter,Lubegard,Archoil
2007 Grand Marquis,RL,K&N,SS Filter,Lubegard,Archoil
2010 Raptor,RL,SS Filter,Lubegard,Archoil

Top
#3361159 - 05/04/14 03:01 AM Re: tests and case studies of archoil [Re: boxcartommie22]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 32562
Loc: Oz
For starters, they mis-apply the carbon mass balance procedure to running an engine at fast idle, under no load (well the differential of the exhaust stack, but that's the total load.

The mentioning of the nobel prize in chemistry has SFA to do with using organometallic compounds as a fuel catalyst, but two geezers who independently mapped out the structure of ferrocene, and worked out means of making it...but it makes it look/sound as though the nobel prize was for their snake oil.

And amazingly, it's BOTH a cetane improver and Octane enhancer.

As per the other thread, I've played with organometalic adds, thinking that the literature supplied demonstrated something...never once have I had positive effect (funny coloured sparkplugs not being either a positive or a negative).

OP in the other thread claimed instant results, while Archoil claim either thousands of hours, or miles are needed to "condition" the vehicle.

Top
#3361162 - 05/04/14 03:42 AM Re: tests and case studies of archoil [Re: boxcartommie22]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 32562
Loc: Oz
And in recent years, (last 3) I've run dozens of tanks of this
http://image2.jcwstatics.com/documents/MaterialSafetyDataSheet_2011.pdf

Same active ingredient, with absolutely nothing happening.

Top
#3361163 - 05/04/14 03:57 AM Re: tests and case studies of archoil [Re: boxcartommie22]
Clevy Offline


Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 9782
Loc: Saskatoon canada
Thanks Shannow


I didn't even bother going to the link. Marketing fluff cleverly worded so the reader is left to interpret how they see fit.
How exactly is a fuel system "conditioned"?
It's either clean or it isn't right?
Or what am I missing?
_________________________
2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter

Top
#3361166 - 05/04/14 04:16 AM Re: tests and case studies of archoil [Re: boxcartommie22]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 32562
Loc: Oz
Clevy, I've used this one as well...it's a better read, in that it tries to explain as opposed to baffle.

http://fpc1.com/sci_ferrocene.php

Interesting they claim that the studies show the octane enhancer part, but state that this is detrimental to diesels, and reduces fuel economy by the same mechanism...can't have both.

I can vouch for the red sparkplugs in another catalyst I used (Holt's Redkote, back in the early '90s)...interesting that the iron oxide produced by the combustion could be abrasive to valve guides... :doh: ...didn't think of that when I was running it.

Top
#3361498 - 05/04/14 02:40 PM Re: tests and case studies of archoil [Re: Shannow]
simple_simon Offline


Registered: 01/26/11
Posts: 109
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted By: Shannow
For starters, they mis-apply the carbon mass balance procedure to running an engine at fast idle, under no load (well the differential of the exhaust stack, but that's the total load.

The mentioning of the nobel prize in chemistry has SFA to do with using organometallic compounds as a fuel catalyst, but two geezers who independently mapped out the structure of ferrocene, and worked out means of making it...but it makes it look/sound as though the nobel prize was for their snake oil.

And amazingly, it's BOTH a cetane improver and Octane enhancer.

As per the other thread, I've played with organometalic adds, thinking that the literature supplied demonstrated something...never once have I had positive effect (funny coloured sparkplugs not being either a positive or a negative).

OP in the other thread claimed instant results, while Archoil claim either thousands of hours, or miles are needed to "condition" the vehicle.


The OP hasn't the slightest idea how a modern IC engine works though as witnessed by the ridiculous hand-on-the-manifold test.

Top
#3361797 - 05/04/14 07:51 PM Re: tests and case studies of archoil [Re: boxcartommie22]
silverrat Online   content


Registered: 01/09/09
Posts: 1442
Loc: Ontario
OP has been an additive junkie on this board for over 10 years, so his mind is well made up.

I just found it odd that the first PDF I clicked on had these mistakes

https://www.argreensupplies.com/uploads/Test_case_DCCG_Volvo-_Penta_revised.pdf

"Project: Reduction wear on Volvo- Penta Engines and stern drives
Started September 2012
Ended June 2012
"

ok.....


"Low speed towing is much of the included in their daily workload."
_________________________
03 Civic Si(R) - Assembled in Swindon, England
Long Live the Manual Transmission drive

Top