Recent Topics
klotz super techniplate feed back
by mcn1970
1 minute 21 seconds ago
ISIS appears 5 miles from Baghdad
by dave1251
25 minutes 25 seconds ago
ML-The Silent Danger of Abrupt Lubricant Failure
by wemay
44 minutes 20 seconds ago
Apple releases important update
by Mystic
Today at 09:56 PM
Machinery Lubrication - 'GrpIII syn is mktng term'
by wemay
Today at 09:41 PM
The Paint is Peelin'!
by Nick1994
Today at 09:39 PM
Pennzoil Syn Blend Or Yellow Bottle 5w30 ?
by crazyoildude
Today at 09:29 PM
fram ultra, weird oil pressure
by bowhuuntr
Today at 09:27 PM
Electric dryer tripping breaker
by NateDN10
Today at 09:22 PM
Oil Recommendation - 1996 Grand Marquis
by AjsGarage
Today at 09:11 PM
PQIA- Pennzoil Platinum Pure Plus
by vinu_neuro
Today at 08:46 PM
Fram TG vs Ultra?
by Camprunner
Today at 08:46 PM
Newest Members
mcn1970, KCChemist, bbuice, Hemingway, kcp
51459 Registered Users
Who's Online
93 registered (01rangerxl, 901Memphis, 1 FMF, 2004tdigls, AdRock, AjsGarage, 3 invisible), 1337 Guests and 171 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51459 Members
64 Forums
220056 Topics
3474780 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3348151 - 04/20/14 12:11 PM 9012 vs H7
G-MAN Offline


Registered: 11/15/02
Posts: 8854
Loc: SC

My 2012 Chrysler 300 has the 9012 HIR bulbs as standard in the dual-mode projector headlights. Initially, I was satisfied with the lighting performance. I mean, any bulb in a good projector headlight should perform well, right? Maybe not. The first time I drove in some heavy rain with a little fog it was apparent just how inadequate these headlights are.

The H7 bulbs that were in the projector headlights of my Hyundai van were brighter than the 9012s in my Chrysler. The H7s that are in my non-projector (E-code with complex freeform reflectors) of the 2010 Audi I just got put quite a bit more light on the road on low beam than the 9012s in my Chrysler did.

Clearly, in the Chrysler 300, they are trying to get more out of the 9012 than it is capable of. If only one HIR bulb is going to be forced to pull double duty for both high and low beam in a projector light, they should use the more powerful 9011.
_________________________
2010 Audi A4 2.0T Quattro: Pennzoil Platinum Euro 5w30
2008 Ford Taurus X: MaxLife 5w20; MaxLife ATF

Top
#3348172 - 04/20/14 12:51 PM Re: 9012 vs H7 [Re: G-MAN]
Volvohead Offline


Registered: 05/25/05
Posts: 3546
Loc: SE Pa
That surprises me, as the H7 is no world beater. We've upgraded our H7s to Osram 64217s, which plants a glare-capped H9 to an H7 base. Much better output, with no meaningful risks in an OE fixture.

Sometimes, the fixture is the limiting factor, no matter the bulb used.

Fwiw, there is a gen 3 version of that 9012 available:
http://store.candlepower.com/ph3rdge90h.html

If yours are original, maybe it's just time for fresh bulbs.

Top
#3348846 - 04/21/14 07:27 AM Re: 9012 vs H7 [Re: G-MAN]
Hokiefyd Offline


Registered: 06/24/04
Posts: 11273
Loc: North Carolina
I wrote about this about a year ago after after having a rental 300 for a month. Chrysler's projector setup here is simply not adequate, in my opinion. It's one of the few headlamp systems I've used which I did NOT like. I think the key to the original post is "good projector". I think these simply aren't.

I don't like the low beam-high beam operation on these (too little light on high beam), but even on low beam, there doesn't seem to be a good hotspot in the beam and the light seems pretty "washed out". Wet conditions at night are particularly troublesome.

The headlamps on both of our current cars seem to handily out-perform the 300's headlamps. I don't think it's the light source (9012) as much as it is the optics in the projector. I'm sure they meet all of the FMVSS 108 requirements, but they sure don't instill confidence when driving at night.
_________________________
Cheers,
Jason

2008 Honda CR-V
2005 Acura MDX

Top