Recent Topics
My Oil Choices delivering pizzas
by AvoidTheNoid
18 minutes 45 seconds ago
gas & diesel now only 10 cents apart
by Donald
22 minutes 3 seconds ago
Complete Redline Synthetic Harley Oil/Fluid Change
by Climb14er
48 minutes 11 seconds ago
spraying fluid film
by buck91
Today at 08:51 AM
AAP $50 off $100+ first 1000 customers.
by sayjac
Today at 06:20 AM
2014 WSBK Laguna Seca Photo Show...
by BusyLittleShop
Today at 01:50 AM
What Cologne Do You Wear?
by Cooper
Today at 01:38 AM
Wix filter manufacturing changes ?
by CELICA_XX
Today at 01:07 AM
Valvoline Conv. 5 qts 10W30 $14.39 Amazon
by Warstud
Today at 12:06 AM
1997 Audi A4 Quatro engine oil recomendations
by Nevets91
Yesterday at 11:44 PM
Men's Body Spray
by MolaKule
Yesterday at 11:07 PM
Real mechanics don't use Walmart oil filters
by SilverC6
Yesterday at 10:12 PM
Newest Members
Moral, momay, MatBo911, platypus20, rcube
50704 Registered Users
Who's Online
102 registered (2010_FX4, 29662, 123Saab, 2008wrx, apollomaker, 1999nick, 5 invisible), 1920 Guests and 213 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
50704 Members
64 Forums
216624 Topics
3408898 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3348151 - 04/20/14 12:11 PM 9012 vs H7
G-MAN Offline


Registered: 11/15/02
Posts: 8854
Loc: SC

My 2012 Chrysler 300 has the 9012 HIR bulbs as standard in the dual-mode projector headlights. Initially, I was satisfied with the lighting performance. I mean, any bulb in a good projector headlight should perform well, right? Maybe not. The first time I drove in some heavy rain with a little fog it was apparent just how inadequate these headlights are.

The H7 bulbs that were in the projector headlights of my Hyundai van were brighter than the 9012s in my Chrysler. The H7s that are in my non-projector (E-code with complex freeform reflectors) of the 2010 Audi I just got put quite a bit more light on the road on low beam than the 9012s in my Chrysler did.

Clearly, in the Chrysler 300, they are trying to get more out of the 9012 than it is capable of. If only one HIR bulb is going to be forced to pull double duty for both high and low beam in a projector light, they should use the more powerful 9011.
_________________________
2010 Audi A4 2.0T Quattro: Pennzoil Platinum Euro 5w30
2008 Ford Taurus X: MaxLife 5w20; MaxLife ATF

Top
#3348172 - 04/20/14 12:51 PM Re: 9012 vs H7 [Re: G-MAN]
Volvohead Offline


Registered: 05/25/05
Posts: 3321
Loc: SE Pa
That surprises me, as the H7 is no world beater. We've upgraded our H7s to Osram 64217s, which plants a glare-capped H9 to an H7 base. Much better output, with no meaningful risks in an OE fixture.

Sometimes, the fixture is the limiting factor, no matter the bulb used.

Fwiw, there is a gen 3 version of that 9012 available:
http://store.candlepower.com/ph3rdge90h.html

If yours are original, maybe it's just time for fresh bulbs.

Top
#3348846 - 04/21/14 07:27 AM Re: 9012 vs H7 [Re: G-MAN]
Hokiefyd Offline


Registered: 06/24/04
Posts: 10721
Loc: North Carolina
I wrote about this about a year ago after after having a rental 300 for a month. Chrysler's projector setup here is simply not adequate, in my opinion. It's one of the few headlamp systems I've used which I did NOT like. I think the key to the original post is "good projector". I think these simply aren't.

I don't like the low beam-high beam operation on these (too little light on high beam), but even on low beam, there doesn't seem to be a good hotspot in the beam and the light seems pretty "washed out". Wet conditions at night are particularly troublesome.

The headlamps on both of our current cars seem to handily out-perform the 300's headlamps. I don't think it's the light source (9012) as much as it is the optics in the projector. I'm sure they meet all of the FMVSS 108 requirements, but they sure don't instill confidence when driving at night.
_________________________
Cheers,
Jason

Top