Recent Topics
2013 Silverado 5.3 lifter noise
by gofasterrrr
10/22/14 10:12 PM
Installed my last PureOne today.
by Hollow
10/22/14 09:55 PM
2014 silverado oil issue
by Jschreffler81
10/22/14 09:14 PM
Ford Duratec 2.0
by pbm
10/22/14 08:47 PM
Improving Vision
by lawman1909
10/22/14 08:19 PM
Made a headlamp harness for the Miata
by Klutch9
10/22/14 08:09 PM
Avast Secure Online / CCleaner question
by 97tbird
10/22/14 07:58 PM
Motul 8100 5w40, 5,500 miles, 2002 WRX (stg 4/18G)
by TedMeyer
10/22/14 07:10 PM
2010 Jettas
by ET16
10/22/14 07:02 PM
Kerosene/Diesel Transmission Flush
by dsmith41
10/22/14 06:33 PM
P215/60R15 need 4 new
by FL-400S
10/22/14 06:06 PM
Canadian Troops should take their Weapons Home
by Falken
10/22/14 06:00 PM
Newest Members
Jschreffler81, facefulloffuzz, triodak, mrmike, teedoff00
51668 Registered Users
Who's Online
92 registered (3800Series, 01rangerxl, 901Memphis, abycat, 123Saab, actionstan, 8 invisible), 1398 Guests and 176 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51668 Members
64 Forums
221081 Topics
3494768 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3348151 - 04/20/14 12:11 PM 9012 vs H7
G-MAN Offline


Registered: 11/15/02
Posts: 8869
Loc: SC

My 2012 Chrysler 300 has the 9012 HIR bulbs as standard in the dual-mode projector headlights. Initially, I was satisfied with the lighting performance. I mean, any bulb in a good projector headlight should perform well, right? Maybe not. The first time I drove in some heavy rain with a little fog it was apparent just how inadequate these headlights are.

The H7 bulbs that were in the projector headlights of my Hyundai van were brighter than the 9012s in my Chrysler. The H7s that are in my non-projector (E-code with complex freeform reflectors) of the 2010 Audi I just got put quite a bit more light on the road on low beam than the 9012s in my Chrysler did.

Clearly, in the Chrysler 300, they are trying to get more out of the 9012 than it is capable of. If only one HIR bulb is going to be forced to pull double duty for both high and low beam in a projector light, they should use the more powerful 9011.
_________________________
2010 Audi A4 2.0T Quattro: RLI 5w40 HD Low Ash
2004 Ford Crown Vic: MaxLife 5w20

Top
#3348172 - 04/20/14 12:51 PM Re: 9012 vs H7 [Re: G-MAN]
Volvohead Offline


Registered: 05/25/05
Posts: 3550
Loc: SE Pa
That surprises me, as the H7 is no world beater. We've upgraded our H7s to Osram 64217s, which plants a glare-capped H9 to an H7 base. Much better output, with no meaningful risks in an OE fixture.

Sometimes, the fixture is the limiting factor, no matter the bulb used.

Fwiw, there is a gen 3 version of that 9012 available:
http://store.candlepower.com/ph3rdge90h.html

If yours are original, maybe it's just time for fresh bulbs.

Top
#3348846 - 04/21/14 07:27 AM Re: 9012 vs H7 [Re: G-MAN]
Hokiefyd Offline


Registered: 06/24/04
Posts: 11420
Loc: North Carolina
I wrote about this about a year ago after after having a rental 300 for a month. Chrysler's projector setup here is simply not adequate, in my opinion. It's one of the few headlamp systems I've used which I did NOT like. I think the key to the original post is "good projector". I think these simply aren't.

I don't like the low beam-high beam operation on these (too little light on high beam), but even on low beam, there doesn't seem to be a good hotspot in the beam and the light seems pretty "washed out". Wet conditions at night are particularly troublesome.

The headlamps on both of our current cars seem to handily out-perform the 300's headlamps. I don't think it's the light source (9012) as much as it is the optics in the projector. I'm sure they meet all of the FMVSS 108 requirements, but they sure don't instill confidence when driving at night.
_________________________
Cheers,
Jason

2008 Honda CR-V EX-L (QSUD 5W-30)
2005 Acura MDX Touring (FMC 5W-20)

Top