Recent Topics
More destruction ahead?
by andrewg
21 minutes 11 seconds ago
Sticky intake valves
by Ozzmosis
27 minutes 28 seconds ago
2003 Ford Explorer Sport XLT Differential Fluid
by TalNum
35 minutes 6 seconds ago
QSUD in Ecotec: 2 qts. consumed in 3K !
by Benzadmiral
44 minutes 13 seconds ago
Utica or SK Torque Wrench?
by ET16
48 minutes 7 seconds ago
Fly me to the Moon...
by reemoe2
53 minutes 28 seconds ago
Old HONDA almost too good to be true in Wisconsin
by SumpChump
Today at 08:56 AM
VW and Shell accused of trying to block EV push
by wemay
Today at 08:30 AM
(previously repaired) cracked 351 block. trash?
by tomcat27
Today at 08:12 AM
CarQuest #84045, 600 miles CUT OPEN
by car51
Today at 08:10 AM
Molybdenum, is there a downside?
by 5170
Today at 07:52 AM
Cleaning 'Foggy' Headlights
by coopns
Today at 07:45 AM
Newest Members
Doxxy, Jetstreamz06, TalNum, Spinnizle, JustinL
57758 Registered Users
Who's Online
94 registered (AirgunSavant, 2015_PSD, 901Memphis, 86cutlass307, Alex38, 13 invisible), 1856 Guests and 306 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
57758 Members
66 Forums
248293 Topics
4060070 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3348151 - 04/20/14 12:11 PM 9012 vs H7
G-MAN Offline


Registered: 11/15/02
Posts: 8894
Loc: SC

My 2012 Chrysler 300 has the 9012 HIR bulbs as standard in the dual-mode projector headlights. Initially, I was satisfied with the lighting performance. I mean, any bulb in a good projector headlight should perform well, right? Maybe not. The first time I drove in some heavy rain with a little fog it was apparent just how inadequate these headlights are.

The H7 bulbs that were in the projector headlights of my Hyundai van were brighter than the 9012s in my Chrysler. The H7s that are in my non-projector (E-code with complex freeform reflectors) of the 2010 Audi I just got put quite a bit more light on the road on low beam than the 9012s in my Chrysler did.

Clearly, in the Chrysler 300, they are trying to get more out of the 9012 than it is capable of. If only one HIR bulb is going to be forced to pull double duty for both high and low beam in a projector light, they should use the more powerful 9011.
_________________________
2013 Cadillac ATS 2.5 (RLI 0w30)
2008 BMW Z4 3.0i (RLI 5w40 HD Low Ash)

Top
#3348172 - 04/20/14 12:51 PM Re: 9012 vs H7 [Re: G-MAN]
Volvohead Offline


Registered: 05/25/05
Posts: 3550
Loc: SE Pa
That surprises me, as the H7 is no world beater. We've upgraded our H7s to Osram 64217s, which plants a glare-capped H9 to an H7 base. Much better output, with no meaningful risks in an OE fixture.

Sometimes, the fixture is the limiting factor, no matter the bulb used.

Fwiw, there is a gen 3 version of that 9012 available:
http://store.candlepower.com/ph3rdge90h.html

If yours are original, maybe it's just time for fresh bulbs.

Top
#3348846 - 04/21/14 07:27 AM Re: 9012 vs H7 [Re: G-MAN]
Hokiefyd Offline


Registered: 06/24/04
Posts: 13736
Loc: North Carolina
I wrote about this about a year ago after after having a rental 300 for a month. Chrysler's projector setup here is simply not adequate, in my opinion. It's one of the few headlamp systems I've used which I did NOT like. I think the key to the original post is "good projector". I think these simply aren't.

I don't like the low beam-high beam operation on these (too little light on high beam), but even on low beam, there doesn't seem to be a good hotspot in the beam and the light seems pretty "washed out". Wet conditions at night are particularly troublesome.

The headlamps on both of our current cars seem to handily out-perform the 300's headlamps. I don't think it's the light source (9012) as much as it is the optics in the projector. I'm sure they meet all of the FMVSS 108 requirements, but they sure don't instill confidence when driving at night.
_________________________
Cheers,
Jason

2009 Honda Ridgeline RTL
2005 Acura MDX Touring

Top