Originally Posted By: Gokhan
All I can say from my experience is that the performance of TGMO 0W-20 SN in my engine has been nothing but stellar, much better than conventional 5W-20. I haven't tried the M1 but the SN version of M1 seems OK, despite the SM version of M1 having shown some dismal UOAs. M1, being mostly a group III oil, is no different in composition than most other full synthetics on the shelf, except some true flagships such as Pennzoil Ultra Platinum, which is GTL-based. It's no surprise that M1 is sold at a very low bargain price of $25 per 5 qt.
Regarding the additive pack, TGMO 0W-20 SN, directed by Toyota engineers, contains twice the trinuclear moly found in M1. This results in better fuel economy and less engine wear than M1, with the fuel economy and engine durability always having been the top goals of Toyota. M1 is more like a generic synthetic, containing the minimal amount of moly.
There seems to be a lot of opinion and assumptions in here that being portrayed as fact. M1 has shown to be a great oil that is robust enough for extended drains. How do you know TGMO shows less wear than M1 or any other 0w20? Can you link to a test with actual teardowns not just UOA's?
We do not know the exact base oils used in M1 or any other brand, so saying that an oil is Group X and inferior is just misinformation.