dnewton3
Staff member
The FU is a pretty darn efficient filter.
But so is their TG; rated at the same efficiency, yet for less miles due to lower media holding capacity (as if 10k FCI miles were anything the typical BITOGer would ever see ......). I personally have become a TG convert; great price and ease of attainment. I fear not the fiber end cap.
I have run a Puro Classic to 10k miles and MC FL400 to 15k miles; UOAs and PCs came back fine. Taking a TG to 10k miles is still probably a waste of a filter. Taking a FU to 15k miles is probably a waste of a filter. Most companies are ultra (pun intended) conservative in their applications because it reduces their liability. With the FU rated at 15k miles, it most certainly is capable of more in normal use.
But so is their TG; rated at the same efficiency, yet for less miles due to lower media holding capacity (as if 10k FCI miles were anything the typical BITOGer would ever see ......). I personally have become a TG convert; great price and ease of attainment. I fear not the fiber end cap.
I have run a Puro Classic to 10k miles and MC FL400 to 15k miles; UOAs and PCs came back fine. Taking a TG to 10k miles is still probably a waste of a filter. Taking a FU to 15k miles is probably a waste of a filter. Most companies are ultra (pun intended) conservative in their applications because it reduces their liability. With the FU rated at 15k miles, it most certainly is capable of more in normal use.