Recent Topics
Distributor gear worn sharp
by 007
11 minutes 56 seconds ago
Leak stop?
by 36yrsinTX
21 minutes 10 seconds ago
Definitive proof AW-1 spec oil is JWS 3309
by ozigoo
30 minutes 53 seconds ago
Valvoline filters ???
by wsar10
38 minutes 27 seconds ago
Fluid too clean
by Throt
Today at 04:47 PM
BMW G-48 coolant + Zerex G-05?
by Lead Shoes
Today at 03:59 PM
Harley Davidson Screamin Eagle SYN3 20W/50 Virgin Oil Sample
by DuckRyder
Today at 03:57 PM
Grocery store gas
by slowdime
Today at 03:56 PM
45 qts German Castrol
by joatmon
Today at 03:17 PM
Castrol Magnatec jug price at WMart
by wemay
Today at 03:14 PM
Consequences of overfilling Ford AX4N after flush?
by Pajamarama
Today at 03:09 PM
Pipe plug socket vs. ratchet drive
by dlundblad
Today at 03:07 PM
Newest Members
ozigoo, MIketitan, Zephyr20, gidlestick, Koko4
53009 Registered Users
Who's Online
101 registered (36yrsinTX, 007, 19jacobob93, 2KBMW, ag_ghost, 10 invisible), 1703 Guests and 248 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
53009 Members
66 Forums
227436 Topics
3627943 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3319449 - 03/21/14 10:30 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
eljefino Offline


Registered: 06/15/03
Posts: 25439
Loc: ME
The tire theory of setting to not-too-high a PSI is the tire pushes back against the road after it goes over a pebble. Stiffening the tire interferes with that. It stands to reason that stiff shocks might too.

Top
#3319597 - 03/22/14 09:01 AM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
whip Offline


Registered: 03/03/05
Posts: 1779
Loc: ohio
Originally Posted By: Nayov
Originally Posted By: Trajan

A shock absorber is a mechanical device designed to smooth out or damp shock impulse, and dissipate kinetic energy.

Nothing more. Nothing less.


Yes, but I would add that dissipated energy (heat) is wasted and it costs fuel, but I do concede that the amount is in all probability immeasurable.

Until you can convert the energy from the bump into a way to propel the vehicle, it has zero effect on the fuel economy. Buying a lighter car would help more than anything.
_________________________
On the internet, people can be anything they want. Why do so many choose to be stupid?

Top
#3320122 - 03/22/14 07:13 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: eljefino]
Nayov Offline


Registered: 08/01/09
Posts: 786
Loc: ME
Originally Posted By: eljefino
The tire theory of setting to not-too-high a PSI is the tire pushes back against the road after it goes over a pebble. Stiffening the tire interferes with that. It stands to reason that stiff shocks might too.


Fascinating. I always thought the harder the tire the better for MPG, but, this makes sense. He's to hoping my gas mileage won't be plummeting with my sporty stiff struts. whistle

Top
#3320138 - 03/22/14 07:26 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
Eddie Online   content


Registered: 12/07/03
Posts: 6975
Loc: Florida, Cape Coral
If you make force vs distance diagram you'd see that what you gain is easly lost in the noise. Ed
_________________________
CX5 Touring 2.5L :-)

Top
#3320221 - 03/22/14 08:42 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
jeepman3071 Offline


Registered: 04/15/10
Posts: 1969
Loc: Storrs, Connecticut
The money you save in gas with stiffer shocks will probably not be enough to cover your doctor bills from back problems down the road.
_________________________
2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4.0L (149k) - 5 qts PYB 5w30 + 1 qt PP 5w30, Napa Gold 1085, Magnefine trans filter

Top
#3329346 - 03/31/14 04:22 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Merkava_4]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3533
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: Merkava_4
The more you keep the car in a straight line, the better the fuel mileage will be.

A car getting tossed around from stiff suspension is going to affect its straight line.


Shocks and springs are not powered by the engine, nor is any energy from them used to move forward.
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2