Recent Topics
Experiment comparing G12, Dex-Cool and Peak
by ChiaroBlue
25 minutes 40 seconds ago
Oil for twin turbo USA made engine
by jllgd
Yesterday at 11:01 PM
Steering problems on Toro rear engine riding mower
by Gizmo8800
Yesterday at 10:43 PM
Alignment, rear toe, fix or leave it?
by actionstan
Yesterday at 09:49 PM
TGMO 0W-20, 13 Avalon Hybrid
by dmack2
Yesterday at 09:38 PM
Mobil 1 Custom Blend 0w30 - 4,000 mi, 2014 Mazda 3
by Artem
Yesterday at 09:29 PM
Valvoline Next Gen
by ChevyBadger
Yesterday at 09:18 PM
Valvoline SynPower 0w-20
by klt1986
Yesterday at 08:57 PM
Amsoil 10w40 compare in inboard 5.7liters
by Yannick
Yesterday at 08:40 PM
stainless steel Dishwasher interiors
by spasm3
Yesterday at 08:19 PM
Need adhesive advice
by gfh77665
Yesterday at 08:11 PM
Looking for a diesel fuel additive....
by NattyBoh
Yesterday at 07:23 PM
Newest Members
_diesel_, Glenno9, dwsmith43, Mathew_Boss, Scotthew
51323 Registered Users
Who's Online
38 registered (901Memphis, chriscreags, Cristobal, CATERHAM, ag_ghost, ChiaroBlue, 1 invisible), 918 Guests and 217 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51323 Members
64 Forums
219342 Topics
3461335 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3319449 - 03/21/14 10:30 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
eljefino Offline


Registered: 06/15/03
Posts: 23896
Loc: ME
The tire theory of setting to not-too-high a PSI is the tire pushes back against the road after it goes over a pebble. Stiffening the tire interferes with that. It stands to reason that stiff shocks might too.

Top
#3319597 - 03/22/14 09:01 AM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
whip Offline


Registered: 03/03/05
Posts: 1533
Loc: ohio
Originally Posted By: Nayov
Originally Posted By: Trajan

A shock absorber is a mechanical device designed to smooth out or damp shock impulse, and dissipate kinetic energy.

Nothing more. Nothing less.


Yes, but I would add that dissipated energy (heat) is wasted and it costs fuel, but I do concede that the amount is in all probability immeasurable.

Until you can convert the energy from the bump into a way to propel the vehicle, it has zero effect on the fuel economy. Buying a lighter car would help more than anything.

Top
#3320122 - 03/22/14 07:13 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: eljefino]
Nayov Offline


Registered: 08/01/09
Posts: 720
Loc: ME
Originally Posted By: eljefino
The tire theory of setting to not-too-high a PSI is the tire pushes back against the road after it goes over a pebble. Stiffening the tire interferes with that. It stands to reason that stiff shocks might too.


Fascinating. I always thought the harder the tire the better for MPG, but, this makes sense. He's to hoping my gas mileage won't be plummeting with my sporty stiff struts. whistle

Top
#3320138 - 03/22/14 07:26 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
Eddie Offline


Registered: 12/07/03
Posts: 6692
Loc: Florida, Cape Coral
If you make force vs distance diagram you'd see that what you gain is easly lost in the noise. Ed
_________________________
CX5 Touring 2.5L :-)

Top
#3320221 - 03/22/14 08:42 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
jeepman3071 Offline


Registered: 04/15/10
Posts: 1688
Loc: Storrs, Connecticut
The money you save in gas with stiffer shocks will probably not be enough to cover your doctor bills from back problems down the road.
_________________________
2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4.0L (146k) - PYB 10w40, Wix 51085, Magnefine trans filter

Top
#3329346 - 03/31/14 04:22 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Merkava_4]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3314
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: Merkava_4
The more you keep the car in a straight line, the better the fuel mileage will be.

A car getting tossed around from stiff suspension is going to affect its straight line.


Shocks and springs are not powered by the engine, nor is any energy from them used to move forward.
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2