Recent Topics
2008 bmw x5 - kendall synblend10w30
by DirkDiggler
6 minutes 37 seconds ago
Toyota oil filter housing wrench.
by kazual881
16 minutes 28 seconds ago
Out autozone score
by KenO
Today at 08:58 PM
What's everyone's AZ plan tomorrow?
by Alltherage
Today at 08:33 PM
Starter gone?
by lawman1909
Today at 08:00 PM
Another Castrol surprise - Import MV ATF
by aa1986
Today at 07:39 PM
How old is the Castrol Edge?
by stygz
Today at 07:32 PM
185/60/14 with 195/70/14
by GreeCguy
Today at 06:49 PM
Bloomberg article on Techron
by chiefsfan1
Today at 06:43 PM
38% of the earth is made of .... Bridgmanite???
by aa1986
Today at 06:33 PM
1998 Buick Century Custom Steering 56k miles
by Gito
Today at 06:29 PM
Price Check...4Runner
by klt1986
Today at 06:13 PM
Newest Members
Teetsdownlow, NicTesla, nardbuster, AMG1967, Stillbreathing
52267 Registered Users
Who's Online
106 registered (05LGTLtd, 2KBMW, 01rangerxl, 147_Grain, 1034, 10 invisible), 1277 Guests and 225 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
52267 Members
66 Forums
223816 Topics
3550216 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3319449 - 03/21/14 10:30 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
eljefino Offline


Registered: 06/15/03
Posts: 24695
Loc: ME
The tire theory of setting to not-too-high a PSI is the tire pushes back against the road after it goes over a pebble. Stiffening the tire interferes with that. It stands to reason that stiff shocks might too.

Top
#3319597 - 03/22/14 09:01 AM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
whip Offline


Registered: 03/03/05
Posts: 1638
Loc: ohio
Originally Posted By: Nayov
Originally Posted By: Trajan

A shock absorber is a mechanical device designed to smooth out or damp shock impulse, and dissipate kinetic energy.

Nothing more. Nothing less.


Yes, but I would add that dissipated energy (heat) is wasted and it costs fuel, but I do concede that the amount is in all probability immeasurable.

Until you can convert the energy from the bump into a way to propel the vehicle, it has zero effect on the fuel economy. Buying a lighter car would help more than anything.
_________________________
On the internet, people can be anything they want. Why do so many choose to be stupid?

Top
#3320122 - 03/22/14 07:13 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: eljefino]
Nayov Offline


Registered: 08/01/09
Posts: 782
Loc: ME
Originally Posted By: eljefino
The tire theory of setting to not-too-high a PSI is the tire pushes back against the road after it goes over a pebble. Stiffening the tire interferes with that. It stands to reason that stiff shocks might too.


Fascinating. I always thought the harder the tire the better for MPG, but, this makes sense. He's to hoping my gas mileage won't be plummeting with my sporty stiff struts. whistle

Top
#3320138 - 03/22/14 07:26 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
Eddie Offline


Registered: 12/07/03
Posts: 6856
Loc: Florida, Cape Coral
If you make force vs distance diagram you'd see that what you gain is easly lost in the noise. Ed
_________________________
CX5 Touring 2.5L :-)

Top
#3320221 - 03/22/14 08:42 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
jeepman3071 Offline


Registered: 04/15/10
Posts: 1840
Loc: Storrs, Connecticut
The money you save in gas with stiffer shocks will probably not be enough to cover your doctor bills from back problems down the road.
_________________________
2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4.0L (148k) - 5 qts PYB 5w30 + 1 qt PP 5w30, Napa Gold 1085, Magnefine trans filter

Top
#3329346 - 03/31/14 04:22 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Merkava_4]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3440
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: Merkava_4
The more you keep the car in a straight line, the better the fuel mileage will be.

A car getting tossed around from stiff suspension is going to affect its straight line.


Shocks and springs are not powered by the engine, nor is any energy from them used to move forward.
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2