Recent Topics
Snow Shoe Info Needed
by larryinnewyork
13 minutes 31 seconds ago
Article on antifreeze and pet poisoning
by schuylkill
43 minutes 57 seconds ago
Carlson Hardware
by greasegunn
Today at 05:57 AM
Dang! Snowblower Wasn't in 2WD for Years
by ronbo
Today at 05:56 AM
Nokian WRG3
by Patman
Today at 05:43 AM
Non linearity in mixing VIIs
by Shannow
Today at 03:23 AM
PPPP 5W20 Test Results ?
by ChrisD46
Today at 03:13 AM
Electric fence load
by mjoekingz28
Today at 01:46 AM
Would there be any negative effects?
by 268i
Today at 01:22 AM
How to kill a Leprechaun
by 285south
Yesterday at 11:46 PM
This just made me laugh
by Shannow
Yesterday at 11:19 PM
88-02 or so Chevrolet/GMC 1500
by mjoekingz28
Yesterday at 11:15 PM
Newest Members
dg370, Shuskey4, Student_Mike_77, Stanimal, Sharon
51979 Registered Users
Who's Online
61 registered (asand1, 1foxracing, andyd, BobsArmory, Bandito440, Boomer, 5 invisible), 900 Guests and 181 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51979 Members
66 Forums
222513 Topics
3521610 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#3319449 - 03/21/14 10:30 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
eljefino Offline


Registered: 06/15/03
Posts: 24377
Loc: ME
The tire theory of setting to not-too-high a PSI is the tire pushes back against the road after it goes over a pebble. Stiffening the tire interferes with that. It stands to reason that stiff shocks might too.

Top
#3319597 - 03/22/14 09:01 AM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
whip Offline


Registered: 03/03/05
Posts: 1605
Loc: ohio
Originally Posted By: Nayov
Originally Posted By: Trajan

A shock absorber is a mechanical device designed to smooth out or damp shock impulse, and dissipate kinetic energy.

Nothing more. Nothing less.


Yes, but I would add that dissipated energy (heat) is wasted and it costs fuel, but I do concede that the amount is in all probability immeasurable.

Until you can convert the energy from the bump into a way to propel the vehicle, it has zero effect on the fuel economy. Buying a lighter car would help more than anything.
_________________________
On the internet, people can be anything they want. Why do so many choose to be stupid?

Top
#3320122 - 03/22/14 07:13 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: eljefino]
Nayov Offline


Registered: 08/01/09
Posts: 768
Loc: ME
Originally Posted By: eljefino
The tire theory of setting to not-too-high a PSI is the tire pushes back against the road after it goes over a pebble. Stiffening the tire interferes with that. It stands to reason that stiff shocks might too.


Fascinating. I always thought the harder the tire the better for MPG, but, this makes sense. He's to hoping my gas mileage won't be plummeting with my sporty stiff struts. whistle

Top
#3320138 - 03/22/14 07:26 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
Eddie Offline


Registered: 12/07/03
Posts: 6804
Loc: Florida, Cape Coral
If you make force vs distance diagram you'd see that what you gain is easly lost in the noise. Ed
_________________________
CX5 Touring 2.5L :-)

Top
#3320221 - 03/22/14 08:42 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Nayov]
jeepman3071 Offline


Registered: 04/15/10
Posts: 1801
Loc: Storrs, Connecticut
The money you save in gas with stiffer shocks will probably not be enough to cover your doctor bills from back problems down the road.
_________________________
2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4.0L (148k) - 5 qts PYB 5w30 + 1 qt PP 5w30, Napa Silver 31085, Magnefine trans filter

Top
#3329346 - 03/31/14 04:22 PM Re: Better gas mileage with stiffer suspension. [Re: Merkava_4]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3381
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: Merkava_4
The more you keep the car in a straight line, the better the fuel mileage will be.

A car getting tossed around from stiff suspension is going to affect its straight line.


Shocks and springs are not powered by the engine, nor is any energy from them used to move forward.
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2