Recent Topics
Huffy
by Shellman
8 minutes 29 seconds ago
2012 VW Tiguan; Castrol 0W-40; 54,500 // 4,800 OCI
by motech
27 minutes 58 seconds ago
2004 Chevy Aveo- Auto 1.6L
by AirgunSavant
Today at 08:51 AM
Filter cover?
by Shellman
Today at 08:19 AM
Anyone remember the show "The Moment of Truth"?
by skyactiv
Today at 08:16 AM
2010 Tahoe Z71 Oil, etc.
by SteveP
Today at 07:59 AM
Purolator One and Puro Boss 14006 "Not Cut Open"
by bandz7
Today at 07:04 AM
Nikola Semi
by AirgunSavant
Today at 06:57 AM
Oil Pressure with M1HM 10w30
by lukejo
Today at 05:56 AM
Clay Based HTB Grease
by SR5
Today at 04:33 AM
Which M1 oils are true synthetics
by FordCapriDriver
Today at 04:06 AM
That's unfortunate...or maybe bypass filtration?
by linksep
Today at 02:24 AM
Newest Members
karpouzi, Tapan, shindery, Josh_Westwood, Brogan
58283 Registered Users
Who's Online
78 registered (2010Civic, AirgunSavant, A_Harman, ABerns, ag_ghost, 2015_PSD, 5 invisible), 1784 Guests and 13 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58283 Members
66 Forums
250868 Topics
4111858 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3335754 - 04/07/14 12:13 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 6347
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Well I was going to do a run of SAE30 this summer. Now I've been transferred at I will suddenly be extreme short tripping my Jeep. Not thinking that's the scenario for a straight weight.

I dunno maybe it'd be better?
_________________________
2004 Jeep Grand 4.0 @ 133k Pennzoil HM 10w30 w/ 1 qt 10w40
Fram PH8A
KIA Sedona 60k, Ford Focus 115k, Chrysler Sebring 186k, Chrysler Concorde 115k

Top
#3335794 - 04/07/14 01:11 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
pavelow Offline


Registered: 11/24/09
Posts: 558
Loc: Orange Park, FL
Who uses straight weight oils in 2014? I can't see any use for them except for in lawnmowers and other small engines? lol
_________________________
06 Pontiac GTO LS2
08 Chevy TrailBlazer SS LS2


Top
#3335819 - 04/07/14 01:40 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: pavelow]
kschachn Online   content


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 5469
Loc: Upper Midwest
I don't even use it for them, I see no excessive consumption on M1 0W-30 so what's the point? Why make it any harder than it needs to be?

Originally Posted By: pavelow
Who uses straight weight oils in 2014? I can't see any use for them except for in lawnmowers and other small engines? lol
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 206K
1996 Honda Accord, 217K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 348K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 254K

Top
#3336039 - 04/07/14 05:08 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 7180
Loc: CT
I used to use straight weights in lawn mowers but now even the little engines are all calling for 10w30.

Unless its for an old engine or an air compressor straight weights are obsolete.

A lot of the old timers run them in their boats but I don't see what advantage they offer over any of the modern 15w40's. Certainly not cost 15w40's are always cheaper.


Edited by hattaresguy (04/07/14 05:08 PM)

Top
#3336160 - 04/07/14 07:00 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
zamadison Offline


Registered: 03/17/09
Posts: 20
Loc: California
I could see a straight weight oil being best in an application where an engine was run continuously for long periods of time and not shut down and restarted very often at all.
Perhaps a generator of some sort?

Top
#3336227 - 04/07/14 08:06 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
kschachn Online   content


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 5469
Loc: Upper Midwest
Meh, I have an 8kW standby generator (Briggs twin) using 0W-30, and it runs now and then when the power fails. I really don't have to add any oil between changes which is usually twice a year.
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 206K
1996 Honda Accord, 217K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 348K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 254K

Top
#3337341 - 04/08/14 10:40 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: zamadison]
Ducked Offline


Registered: 10/25/12
Posts: 985
Loc: Taiwan
Originally Posted By: zamadison
I could see a straight weight oil being best in an application where an engine was run continuously for long periods of time and not shut down and restarted very often at all.
Perhaps a generator of some sort?


I could see straight weight oils being best in an application where they never see low temperatures (due to climate or preheat), where the oil is subject to sheer (all applications, but especially motorcycles) where the alleged high startup wear (alleged because although I've seen the numbers quoted a lot, and they are plausible, I've never seen a source for them) is less of an issue due to the above, or due to the use of a prelube system, where the engine sits idle for long periods of time, or where the inferior (?) lubrication of polymeric viscosity modifiers is an issue.

Thats potentially A LOT of applications, but I don't know what the advantages (if any) are ACTUALLY, because I've seen hardly any evidence.

Either way, it's probably out there, but I havn't seen it. A lot of it is probably secret.

Someone on here recently (I thought it was in this thread, but I can't find it) posted a response along the lines of "or do you think multigrades are just a worthless marketing ploy" as if that was inconceivable.

I don't think they're just a marketing ploy, but "worthless marketing ploy" is, in a commercial context, a contradiction, like military intelligence.

If a marketing ploy is effective, it'll be anything but worthless to the people who implement it, regardless of any technical merit.

Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8