Recent Topics
Penrite 0w-16
by toyota62
49 minutes 50 seconds ago
Land Cruiser stuck in mud, rescued by hemi Jeep
by Shannow
Today at 02:53 AM
GM to test self-driving taxis
by xfactor9
Today at 01:09 AM
Resurfacing Brake Rotors
by The Critic
Today at 12:02 AM
Largest M1 filter for Jeep 4.0
by ARMY_Guy
Yesterday at 10:50 PM
Mobil 1 or Castrol edge?
by sky06
Yesterday at 09:48 PM
1 piece lug nut recommendations?
by dlundblad
Yesterday at 09:07 PM
1996 Chrysler Coolant
by outoforder
Yesterday at 09:02 PM
Hat Tip to RMEuropean
by sleddriver
Yesterday at 08:54 PM
Toro OHV considered flat tappet type...
by Duffyjr
Yesterday at 08:48 PM
Tire Rack now carries the Falken Azenis RT615k
by slacktide_bitog
Yesterday at 07:30 PM
Walmart now carries Nokian tires
by slacktide_bitog
Yesterday at 07:16 PM
Newest Members
waldawg, Defcon, drivingaford, funkyheff, Ralph62
57814 Registered Users
Who's Online
22 registered (EchoTech1945, dlundblad, dec219644, d00df00d, Char Baby, eljefino, 4 invisible), 0 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
57814 Members
66 Forums
248537 Topics
4064915 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3335754 - 04/07/14 12:13 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 6241
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Well I was going to do a run of SAE30 this summer. Now I've been transferred at I will suddenly be extreme short tripping my Jeep. Not thinking that's the scenario for a straight weight.

I dunno maybe it'd be better?
_________________________
2004 Jeep Grand 4.0 @ 132k Pennzoil HM 10w30 w/ 1 qt 10w40
Fram PH8A
KIA Sedona 57k, Ford Focus 114k, Chrysler Sebring 184k, Chrysler Concorde 115k

Top
#3335794 - 04/07/14 01:11 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
pavelow Offline


Registered: 11/24/09
Posts: 558
Loc: Orange Park, FL
Who uses straight weight oils in 2014? I can't see any use for them except for in lawnmowers and other small engines? lol
_________________________
06 Pontiac GTO LS2
08 Chevy TrailBlazer SS LS2


Top
#3335819 - 04/07/14 01:40 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: pavelow]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 5229
Loc: Upper Midwest
I don't even use it for them, I see no excessive consumption on M1 0W-30 so what's the point? Why make it any harder than it needs to be?

Originally Posted By: pavelow
Who uses straight weight oils in 2014? I can't see any use for them except for in lawnmowers and other small engines? lol
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 205K
1996 Honda Accord, 216K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 344K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 252K

Top
#3336039 - 04/07/14 05:08 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 7180
Loc: CT
I used to use straight weights in lawn mowers but now even the little engines are all calling for 10w30.

Unless its for an old engine or an air compressor straight weights are obsolete.

A lot of the old timers run them in their boats but I don't see what advantage they offer over any of the modern 15w40's. Certainly not cost 15w40's are always cheaper.


Edited by hattaresguy (04/07/14 05:08 PM)

Top
#3336160 - 04/07/14 07:00 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
zamadison Offline


Registered: 03/17/09
Posts: 20
Loc: California
I could see a straight weight oil being best in an application where an engine was run continuously for long periods of time and not shut down and restarted very often at all.
Perhaps a generator of some sort?

Top
#3336227 - 04/07/14 08:06 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 5229
Loc: Upper Midwest
Meh, I have an 8kW standby generator (Briggs twin) using 0W-30, and it runs now and then when the power fails. I really don't have to add any oil between changes which is usually twice a year.
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 205K
1996 Honda Accord, 216K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 344K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 252K

Top
#3337341 - 04/08/14 10:40 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: zamadison]
Ducked Offline


Registered: 10/25/12
Posts: 788
Loc: Taiwan
Originally Posted By: zamadison
I could see a straight weight oil being best in an application where an engine was run continuously for long periods of time and not shut down and restarted very often at all.
Perhaps a generator of some sort?


I could see straight weight oils being best in an application where they never see low temperatures (due to climate or preheat), where the oil is subject to sheer (all applications, but especially motorcycles) where the alleged high startup wear (alleged because although I've seen the numbers quoted a lot, and they are plausible, I've never seen a source for them) is less of an issue due to the above, or due to the use of a prelube system, where the engine sits idle for long periods of time, or where the inferior (?) lubrication of polymeric viscosity modifiers is an issue.

Thats potentially A LOT of applications, but I don't know what the advantages (if any) are ACTUALLY, because I've seen hardly any evidence.

Either way, it's probably out there, but I havn't seen it. A lot of it is probably secret.

Someone on here recently (I thought it was in this thread, but I can't find it) posted a response along the lines of "or do you think multigrades are just a worthless marketing ploy" as if that was inconceivable.

I don't think they're just a marketing ploy, but "worthless marketing ploy" is, in a commercial context, a contradiction, like military intelligence.

If a marketing ploy is effective, it'll be anything but worthless to the people who implement it, regardless of any technical merit.

Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8