Recent Topics
Ever have an "old guy" day?
by daves87rs
Today at 10:25 PM
Fram Ultra C$11.87 (Ontario)
by dgunay
Today at 10:16 PM
dodge 4.7 fram problem?
by joel95ex
Today at 09:45 PM
ok until oil change 4.7 dodge
by joel95ex
Today at 09:41 PM
0w20 vs 5w20 running on a Mazda 3 2014
by Stewie
Today at 09:37 PM
5w20/30 4.4L Castrol Edge WM Canada $24.88
by Stewie
Today at 09:31 PM
Back to greasing stuff...
by JHZR2
Today at 09:04 PM
Castrol Import Multi question
by Carguy21
Today at 08:20 PM
2005 F150 steering rack
by Colt45ws
Today at 08:12 PM
Tinkering around today with my Cold Air Intake
by GumbyJarvis
Today at 07:51 PM
Crude Oil at Historic Lows and 5W30 is High Priced
by cjcride
Today at 07:35 PM
2014 f150 coolant
by robo339
Today at 07:27 PM
Newest Members
paulp, ATLjunkcars, jqgz, ukpdxwrx, TerrenceRocks
56865 Registered Users
Who's Online
59 registered (askani79705, akela, 901Memphis, 01_celica_gt, 90crvtec, ammolab, 4 invisible), 882 Guests and 220 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
56865 Members
66 Forums
244432 Topics
3980469 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3335754 - 04/07/14 12:13 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 6047
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Well I was going to do a run of SAE30 this summer. Now I've been transferred at I will suddenly be extreme short tripping my Jeep. Not thinking that's the scenario for a straight weight.

I dunno maybe it'd be better?
_________________________
2004 Jeep Grand 4.0 @ 130k Pennzoil HM 5w30 w/ 1 qt 10w40
Fram TG8A
KIA Sedona 55k, Chevy Lumina 182k, Chrysler Sebring 183k, Chrysler Concorde 111k

Top
#3335794 - 04/07/14 01:11 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
pavelow Offline


Registered: 11/24/09
Posts: 558
Loc: Orange Park, FL
Who uses straight weight oils in 2014? I can't see any use for them except for in lawnmowers and other small engines? lol
_________________________
06 Pontiac GTO LS2
08 Chevy TrailBlazer SS LS2


Top
#3335819 - 04/07/14 01:40 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: pavelow]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 4746
Loc: Upper Midwest
I don't even use it for them, I see no excessive consumption on M1 0W-30 so what's the point? Why make it any harder than it needs to be?

Originally Posted By: pavelow
Who uses straight weight oils in 2014? I can't see any use for them except for in lawnmowers and other small engines? lol
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 202K
1996 Honda Accord, 213K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 334K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 248K

Top
#3336039 - 04/07/14 05:08 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 7139
Loc: CT
I used to use straight weights in lawn mowers but now even the little engines are all calling for 10w30.

Unless its for an old engine or an air compressor straight weights are obsolete.

A lot of the old timers run them in their boats but I don't see what advantage they offer over any of the modern 15w40's. Certainly not cost 15w40's are always cheaper.


Edited by hattaresguy (04/07/14 05:08 PM)

Top
#3336160 - 04/07/14 07:00 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
zamadison Offline


Registered: 03/17/09
Posts: 13
Loc: California
I could see a straight weight oil being best in an application where an engine was run continuously for long periods of time and not shut down and restarted very often at all.
Perhaps a generator of some sort?

Top
#3336227 - 04/07/14 08:06 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 4746
Loc: Upper Midwest
Meh, I have an 8kW standby generator (Briggs twin) using 0W-30, and it runs now and then when the power fails. I really don't have to add any oil between changes which is usually twice a year.
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 202K
1996 Honda Accord, 213K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 334K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 248K

Top
#3337341 - 04/08/14 10:40 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: zamadison]
Ducked Offline


Registered: 10/25/12
Posts: 600
Loc: Taiwan
Originally Posted By: zamadison
I could see a straight weight oil being best in an application where an engine was run continuously for long periods of time and not shut down and restarted very often at all.
Perhaps a generator of some sort?


I could see straight weight oils being best in an application where they never see low temperatures (due to climate or preheat), where the oil is subject to sheer (all applications, but especially motorcycles) where the alleged high startup wear (alleged because although I've seen the numbers quoted a lot, and they are plausible, I've never seen a source for them) is less of an issue due to the above, or due to the use of a prelube system, where the engine sits idle for long periods of time, or where the inferior (?) lubrication of polymeric viscosity modifiers is an issue.

Thats potentially A LOT of applications, but I don't know what the advantages (if any) are ACTUALLY, because I've seen hardly any evidence.

Either way, it's probably out there, but I havn't seen it. A lot of it is probably secret.

Someone on here recently (I thought it was in this thread, but I can't find it) posted a response along the lines of "or do you think multigrades are just a worthless marketing ploy" as if that was inconceivable.

I don't think they're just a marketing ploy, but "worthless marketing ploy" is, in a commercial context, a contradiction, like military intelligence.

If a marketing ploy is effective, it'll be anything but worthless to the people who implement it, regardless of any technical merit.

Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8