Recent Topics
DRL's are going to kill me.
by BMWTurboDzl
08/22/14 06:30 AM
PS Fluid for '97 Jeep Cherokee 4.0L ?
by ChrisD46
08/22/14 05:13 AM
20w-20 diesel oil
by OneEyeJack
08/21/14 10:53 PM
Cartridge Razors
by Merkava_4
08/21/14 10:47 PM
steel wool to clean dipstick
by lukejo
08/21/14 10:37 PM
Hacking Traffic Lights
by Pop_Rivit
08/21/14 09:41 PM
Creaking sound after lower control arm replacement
by WeenieHutJr
08/21/14 09:20 PM
weird disclaimer on water heater anode
by friendly_jacek
08/21/14 08:25 PM
The story behind the 427 SOHC (Ford's Cammer)
by OVERKILL
08/21/14 08:22 PM
best brand ac compressor?
by FLORIDA
08/21/14 08:06 PM
Does SAE grad even matter in a splash lubed engine
by fdcg27
08/21/14 07:54 PM
how screwed am I here....
by Spawne32
08/21/14 07:43 PM
Newest Members
tomlct, geeboss, jerryvang, carguru, Uol
51039 Registered Users
Who's Online
55 registered (bigt61, bluesubie, 2010_FX4, 9 invisible), 1075 Guests and 200 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51039 Members
64 Forums
218132 Topics
3438556 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Topic Options
#3335754 - 04/07/14 12:13 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 4484
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Well I was going to do a run of SAE30 this summer. Now I've been transferred at I will suddenly be extreme short tripping my Jeep. Not thinking that's the scenario for a straight weight.

I dunno maybe it'd be better?
_________________________
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0 @ 121k Pennzoil HM 10w30
Napa Silver 31515
KIA Sedona 38k, Chevy Lumina 170k, Chrysler Sebring 171k, Ford Ranger 175k!

Top
#3335794 - 04/07/14 01:11 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
pavelow Offline


Registered: 11/24/09
Posts: 558
Loc: Orange Park, FL
Who uses straight weight oils in 2014? I can't see any use for them except for in lawnmowers and other small engines? lol
_________________________
06 Pontiac GTO LS2
08 Chevy TrailBlazer SS LS2


Top
#3335819 - 04/07/14 01:40 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: pavelow]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 2459
Loc: Upper Midwest
I don't even use it for them, I see no excessive consumption on M1 0W-30 so what's the point? Why make it any harder than it needs to be?

Originally Posted By: pavelow
Who uses straight weight oils in 2014? I can't see any use for them except for in lawnmowers and other small engines? lol
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 188K
1996 Honda Accord, 201K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 302K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 223K

Top
#3336039 - 04/07/14 05:08 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 4943
Loc: CT
I used to use straight weights in lawn mowers but now even the little engines are all calling for 10w30.

Unless its for an old engine or an air compressor straight weights are obsolete.

A lot of the old timers run them in their boats but I don't see what advantage they offer over any of the modern 15w40's. Certainly not cost 15w40's are always cheaper.


Edited by hattaresguy (04/07/14 05:08 PM)

Top
#3336160 - 04/07/14 07:00 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
zamadison Offline


Registered: 03/17/09
Posts: 13
Loc: California
I could see a straight weight oil being best in an application where an engine was run continuously for long periods of time and not shut down and restarted very often at all.
Perhaps a generator of some sort?

Top
#3336227 - 04/07/14 08:06 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: Now]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 2459
Loc: Upper Midwest
Meh, I have an 8kW standby generator (Briggs twin) using 0W-30, and it runs now and then when the power fails. I really don't have to add any oil between changes which is usually twice a year.
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 188K
1996 Honda Accord, 201K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 302K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 223K

Top
#3337341 - 04/08/14 10:40 PM Re: Advantages of straight weight oil [Re: zamadison]
Ducked Offline


Registered: 10/25/12
Posts: 158
Loc: Taiwan
Originally Posted By: zamadison
I could see a straight weight oil being best in an application where an engine was run continuously for long periods of time and not shut down and restarted very often at all.
Perhaps a generator of some sort?


I could see straight weight oils being best in an application where they never see low temperatures (due to climate or preheat), where the oil is subject to sheer (all applications, but especially motorcycles) where the alleged high startup wear (alleged because although I've seen the numbers quoted a lot, and they are plausible, I've never seen a source for them) is less of an issue due to the above, or due to the use of a prelube system, where the engine sits idle for long periods of time, or where the inferior (?) lubrication of polymeric viscosity modifiers is an issue.

Thats potentially A LOT of applications, but I don't know what the advantages (if any) are ACTUALLY, because I've seen hardly any evidence.

Either way, it's probably out there, but I havn't seen it. A lot of it is probably secret.

Someone on here recently (I thought it was in this thread, but I can't find it) posted a response along the lines of "or do you think multigrades are just a worthless marketing ploy" as if that was inconceivable.

I don't think they're just a marketing ploy, but "worthless marketing ploy" is, in a commercial context, a contradiction, like military intelligence.

If a marketing ploy is effective, it'll be anything but worthless to the people who implement it, regardless of any technical merit.

Top
Page 8 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8