Recent Topics
Clean thick oil in throttle body?!
by 19jacobob93
10/25/14 12:57 AM
Auto Parts Store Selling More Oil Filters Now..
by crazyoildude
10/24/14 11:27 PM
Sun facts
by oilboy123
10/24/14 11:25 PM
Cooper Zeon RS3-A Long Term Impressions
by MCompact
10/24/14 11:01 PM
Desulfator built into battery charger do they work
by Crankytank
10/24/14 10:47 PM
what are you guys flipping?
by Chris142
10/24/14 09:50 PM
Fram Ultra low prices at Rockauto $6.76
by 901Memphis
10/24/14 09:35 PM
mobil 1 vs castrol synthetic gear oil????????
by whitearrow
10/24/14 09:30 PM
5.7L Hemi Ram 1500 rod knock when cold
by butcherman
10/24/14 09:29 PM
Turbo 350 - DexIII or VI
by GSCJR
10/24/14 08:48 PM
94 Jaguar XJS 6.0 V12, 1400 mi, Unknown xW-30
by Wampahoofus
10/24/14 08:43 PM
Snow vs ice tire
by supton
10/24/14 08:35 PM
Newest Members
ChevyTwo, BrianPA, JeepCommander, hevslark, Hox
51688 Registered Users
Who's Online
27 registered (bubbatime, Black_Thunder, 01_celica_gt, 3800Series, 901Memphis, ARB1977, 1 invisible), 667 Guests and 223 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51688 Members
64 Forums
221173 Topics
3496882 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3279119 - 02/12/14 09:17 AM An oldie but a goody, req'd reading for BITOG'ers?
LoneRanger Offline


Registered: 07/02/07
Posts: 1454
Loc: Midwest
From 2009, lot of good basic info:

http://www.zddplus.com/TechBrief10%20-%20Oil%20Base%20Stocks.pdf

Amsoil vs. Mobil debaters, take note of 1972, 1973, 1977. Amsoil may have been first w/ a diester base product by a year (1972), but Mobil was actually first to use PAO base with Amsoil following Mobil's lead in 1977 and reformulating to PAO... or so it appears.

_________________________

'09 Subaru Forester .. (Kendall GT-1 Syn Blend 5W30)
'13 Ducati MTS .......... (Silkolene Pro 4 Ester 15W50)

Top
#3279179 - 02/12/14 10:19 AM Re: An oldie but a goody, req'd reading for BITOG'ers? [Re: LoneRanger]
JHZR2 Offline



Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 33786
Loc: New Jersey
Will be interesting to hear Doug and Tom's input on this wrt dates.

Top
#3279183 - 02/12/14 10:20 AM Re: An oldie but a goody, req'd reading for BITOG'ers? [Re: LoneRanger]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 12540
Loc: Chicago, IL
It's form 2008 so obviously it's a bit out of date.
_________________________
2011.5 BMW M3 saloon ZCP
der stärkste buchstabe der welt
Castrol Edge Professional TWS 10w60 + Mahle OX 254D3

Top
#3279294 - 02/12/14 11:43 AM Re: An oldie but a goody, req'd reading for BITOG'ers? [Re: LoneRanger]
Wilhelm_D Offline


Registered: 01/28/09
Posts: 818
Loc: Tacoma, WA
Originally Posted By: LoneRanger
From 2009, lot of good basic info:

http://www.zddplus.com/TechBrief10%20-%20Oil%20Base%20Stocks.pdf

Amsoil vs. Mobil debaters, take note of 1972, 1973, 1977. Amsoil may have been first w/ a diester base product by a year (1972), but Mobil was actually first to use PAO base with Amsoil following Mobil's lead in 1977 and reformulating to PAO... or so it appears.


The blurb states:

"Amsoil™ reformulates its product to the higher performance PAO/ester blend"

I am not sure that PAO/ester is "higher performance" than diester per se. I worked with a number of diester-based synthetics in the late 60s into the mid-70s that were pretty darned good. The main problem was expense - they were not cheap to formulate.

There were also motor oils based on polyalkylene glycol (PAG), neopentyl polyol esters, alkylated benzenes, and others. Some of them had compatibility issues with seals, gaskets, and in the case of PAG other motor oils.

A lot of the information I read about the history of synthetics is not very accurate.

Top
#3280387 - 02/13/14 08:15 AM Re: An oldie but a goody, req'd reading for BITOG'ers? [Re: LoneRanger]
Tom NJ Offline


Registered: 07/27/06
Posts: 1628
Loc: New Jersey & Virginia
The Amsoil synthetic was introduced in 1972. The reformulation to PAO/Diester took place in 1979.

My recollection is that Mobil 1 was released in the USA in 1974, but they did introduced it in Europe about a year earlier. IIRC, the European product was about 80% PAO with about 10% each of two polyol esters (TMP C7 and PE C7), while the USA offering contained PAO with a single POE (TMP C8C10). They switched the ester portion to a diester (DTDA) around 1980, and then back to POE (TMP C8C10) in the 90s. They began introducing Grp III+ in the early 2000s, and by 2006 were mostly Grp III+ with PAO and AN and very little POE.

Not that this has any value beyond historical trivia.

Tom NJ

Top
#3280394 - 02/13/14 08:23 AM Re: An oldie but a goody, req'd reading for BITOG'ers? [Re: Wilhelm_D]
Tom NJ Offline


Registered: 07/27/06
Posts: 1628
Loc: New Jersey & Virginia
Originally Posted By: Wilhelm_D
I am not sure that PAO/ester is "higher performance" than diester per se. I worked with a number of diester-based synthetics in the late 60s into the mid-70s that were pretty darned good. The main problem was expense - they were not cheap to formulate.


I agree, those early all diester synthetic oils were quite good (Amsoil, Pacer, Zonex, Red Line, Neo, etc.) Hatco ran one through a double Sequence III engine test and had 0% viscosity increase! The SE specification was 400% max.

Tom NJ

Top
#3282481 - 02/14/14 10:33 PM Re: An oldie but a goody, req'd reading for BITOG'ers? [Re: LoneRanger]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 14644
Loc: Midwest
The whole debate of who was first in synthetics is somewhat silly in my view.

It took many years of chemistry development by many people to arrive at where we are.

But for Trivia purposes, here is another historical view:


Synthetic Oil Development by LePera
_________________________
Just pour the coffee and back away slowly! smile

Top
#3282821 - 02/15/14 09:57 AM Re: An oldie but a goody, req'd reading for BITOG'ers? [Re: MolaKule]
Tom NJ Offline


Registered: 07/27/06
Posts: 1628
Loc: New Jersey & Virginia
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
The whole debate of who was first in synthetics is somewhat silly in my view.

It took many years of chemistry development by many people to arrive at where we are.

But for Trivia purposes, here is another historical view:


Synthetic Oil Development by LePera


Thanks Phil - that was the first "History of Synthetics" type article that I have found no fault with.

And the winner is.... "the Army is recognized for leading the introduction of synthetic oils for automotive engine and powertrain applications."

Tom NJ

Top