Recent Topics
Lubricant Education-Literally
by John_Conrad
10/22/14 08:26 AM
Ford Ranger tires.
by DuckRyder
10/22/14 07:30 AM
Leaking Transmission drain plug
by Mulestang
10/22/14 06:46 AM
Calamari
by Char Baby
10/22/14 06:44 AM
The Coffee Police..
by Warstud
10/22/14 05:26 AM
Cheap No Contract phone wanted... Sick of it.
by JGmazda
10/22/14 02:52 AM
1994 Volvo 945 / Q8 T1000D Dino 10w30 @8000 Km
by miniac007
10/22/14 02:32 AM
What are your favorite detailing products?
by The Critic
10/22/14 02:27 AM
Oil Filter Autopsy Question
by Nyogtha
10/22/14 12:58 AM
Napa Gold (Wix) Oil Filters Threads Machined Badly
by crazyoildude
10/22/14 12:44 AM
Need oil for car with oil control ring issues
by Oro_O
10/21/14 11:34 PM
AMSOIL Oil Filter Demonstrator
by CELICA_XX
10/21/14 11:31 PM
Newest Members
ArtGarcia, 12e, AnonyBliss, Rits, BMEP
51659 Registered Users
Who's Online
98 registered (2010_FX4, AandPDan, -SyN-, abycat, 2004tdigls, 7 invisible), 1572 Guests and 160 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51659 Members
64 Forums
221048 Topics
3493932 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
Topic Options
#3292640 - 02/24/14 10:04 AM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: dave5358]
simple_simon Offline


Registered: 01/26/11
Posts: 103
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Please take the spam somewhere else. No one here is buying that garbage.


Okay, you don't like Archoil. Otherwise, how does this contribute to the thread?


Perhaps you should try reading the thread a few more times until you understand. It's spam that I don't like, not Archoil.

Top
#3292642 - 02/24/14 10:07 AM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: simple_simon]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Perhaps you should try reading the thread a few more times until you understand. It's spam that I don't like, not Archoil.


How does this contribute to this thread?
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3292645 - 02/24/14 10:10 AM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: dave5358]
simple_simon Offline


Registered: 01/26/11
Posts: 103
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Perhaps you should try reading the thread a few more times until you understand. It's spam that I don't like, not Archoil.


How does this contribute to this thread?


Um, obviously by contributing knowledge, logic and reason to a thread where statements like this are running rampant:

Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
I could not believe it adding that boran additive ar9100 from archoil has did to reducing the heat greatly!!!


Edited by simple_simon (02/24/14 10:11 AM)

Top
#3292660 - 02/24/14 10:19 AM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: simple_simon]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Originally Posted By: dave5358
How does this contribute to this thread?


Um, obviously by contributing knowledge, logic and reason to a thread where statements like this are running rampant:

Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
I could not believe it adding that boran additive ar9100 from archoil has did to reducing the heat greatly!!!


At least boxcartommie22 was commenting on the product, rather than commenting on other users. You might check the definitions of 'spam', 'logic' and 'reason'.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3292710 - 02/24/14 11:16 AM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: simple_simon]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3349
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
I could not believe it adding that boran additive ar9100 from archoil has did to reducing the heat greatly!!!


Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
first of all,i didn't say the reduced heat was from archoil.the heat reduction just so happens after a couple of weeks after archoil ar9100..coincidence maybe or maybe not.i don't feel it is necessary to be mocked by low life's on here for someone's opinion.


Please take the spam somewhere else. No one here is buying that garbage.


It intrigues me as how one can say that the ar9100 reduced heat greatly, then say it wasn't from ar9100.

So which is it?

(Good catch simple_simon!!)
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Top
#3292724 - 02/24/14 11:41 AM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: Trajan]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
I could not believe it adding that boran additive ar9100 from archoil has did to reducing the heat greatly!!!


Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
first of all,i didn't say the reduced heat was from archoil.the heat reduction just so happens after a couple of weeks after archoil ar9100..coincidence maybe or maybe not.i don't feel it is necessary to be mocked by low life's on here for someone's opinion.


Please take the spam somewhere else. No one here is buying that garbage.


It intrigues me as how one can say that the ar9100 reduced heat greatly, then say it wasn't from ar9100.

So which is it?

(Good catch simple_simon!!)


It intrigues me as to how one can conveniently misread simple statements:

- "I could not believe it adding that boran additive ar9100 from archoil has did to reducing the heat greatly"

- "first of all,i didn't say the reduced heat was from archoil."

Trajan: do you have any information or experience about AR9100 reducing engine heat (or not)? Pretty clearly, simple_simon does not.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3292808 - 02/24/14 01:02 PM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: jonny-b]
boxcartommie22 Offline


Registered: 01/03/03
Posts: 2997
Loc: moutain country
clevy, archoil says this is designed to be a fm..now the boron in say red line, functions as a detergent and a fm.. this is what I understand.
_________________________
2001 Lincoln Conti,RL,K&N,SS Filter,Lubegard,Archoil
2007 Grand Marquis,RL,K&N,SS Filter,Lubegard,Archoil
2010 Raptor,RL,SS Filter,Lubegard,Archoil

Top
#3292815 - 02/24/14 01:08 PM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: dave5358]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3349
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
I could not believe it adding that boran additive ar9100 from archoil has did to reducing the heat greatly!!!


Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
first of all,i didn't say the reduced heat was from archoil.the heat reduction just so happens after a couple of weeks after archoil ar9100..coincidence maybe or maybe not.i don't feel it is necessary to be mocked by low life's on here for someone's opinion.


Please take the spam somewhere else. No one here is buying that garbage.


It intrigues me as how one can say that the ar9100 reduced heat greatly, then say it wasn't from ar9100.

So which is it?

(Good catch simple_simon!!)


It intrigues me as to how one can conveniently misread simple statements:

- "I could not believe it adding that boran additive ar9100 from archoil has did to reducing the heat greatly"

- "first of all,i didn't say the reduced heat was from archoil."

Trajan: do you have any information or experience about AR9100 reducing engine heat (or not)? Pretty clearly, simple_simon does not.



And just what simple statement was misread?

Let us not dwell on the poor English. Let's figure he meant to say "done" instead of "did." (It is the internet after all.)

So, which is it? First sentence attributes this temp lowering claim to the product. The second says it wasn't it.
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Top
#3292931 - 02/24/14 03:02 PM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: Trajan]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Let us not dwell on the poor English <snip>

Great idea. Now, do you have anything to contribute about Archoil's impact on engine temperature?

Any information on Archoil at all?

Any information?
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3292935 - 02/24/14 03:09 PM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: dave5358]
simple_simon Offline


Registered: 01/26/11
Posts: 103
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
I could not believe it adding that boran additive ar9100 from archoil has did to reducing the heat greatly!!!


Originally Posted By: boxcartommie22
first of all,i didn't say the reduced heat was from archoil.the heat reduction just so happens after a couple of weeks after archoil ar9100..coincidence maybe or maybe not.i don't feel it is necessary to be mocked by low life's on here for someone's opinion.


Please take the spam somewhere else. No one here is buying that garbage.


It intrigues me as how one can say that the ar9100 reduced heat greatly, then say it wasn't from ar9100.

So which is it?

(Good catch simple_simon!!)


It intrigues me as to how one can conveniently misread simple statements:

- "I could not believe it adding that boran additive ar9100 from archoil has did to reducing the heat greatly"

- "first of all,i didn't say the reduced heat was from archoil."

Trajan: do you have any information or experience about AR9100 reducing engine heat (or not)? Pretty clearly, simple_simon does not.



Still waiting for you to back up this allegation, dave.

Shills are running scared in here.

Top
#3292951 - 02/24/14 03:20 PM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: dave5358]
Trajan Offline


Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 3349
Loc: SE PA
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Let us not dwell on the poor English <snip>

Great idea. Now, do you have anything to contribute about Archoil's impact on engine temperature?

Any information on Archoil at all?

Any information?


Still waiting for you to tell me, 1: Which simple statement you claim is misread. 2: Why the contradiction?

Then, and only then, will I answer.

Simple_simon, careful with the *S* word.


Edited by Trajan (02/24/14 03:24 PM)
_________________________

Lack of harm does not mean proof of benefit.

Top
#3292960 - 02/24/14 03:36 PM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: Trajan]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Let us not dwell on the poor English <snip>

Great idea. Now, do you have anything to contribute about Archoil's impact on engine temperature?

Any information on Archoil at all?

Any information?

Then, and only then, will I answer.


You have already answered.
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3292965 - 02/24/14 03:47 PM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: Trajan]
simple_simon Offline


Registered: 01/26/11
Posts: 103
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Let us not dwell on the poor English <snip>

Great idea. Now, do you have anything to contribute about Archoil's impact on engine temperature?

Any information on Archoil at all?

Any information?


Still waiting for you to tell me, 1: Which simple statement you claim is misread. 2: Why the contradiction?

Then, and only then, will I answer.

Simple_simon, careful with the *S* word.


Just waiting for Dave or Thomas to start talking about Yugos and lifetime motor oil.

Top
#3292969 - 02/24/14 03:52 PM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: simple_simon]
dave5358 Offline


Registered: 04/25/13
Posts: 669
Loc: North Bend
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Just waiting for Dave or Thomas to start talking about Yugos and lifetime motor oil.


There you go again. Do you have anything to contribute about Archoil's impact on engine temperature?

Any information on Archoil at all?

Any information?
_________________________
2006 Forester XT
2008 Corolla LE

Top
#3292970 - 02/24/14 03:53 PM Re: Archoil AR6200 [Re: dave5358]
simple_simon Offline


Registered: 01/26/11
Posts: 103
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted By: dave5358
Originally Posted By: simple_simon
Just waiting for Dave or Thomas to start talking about Yugos and lifetime motor oil.


There you go again. Do you have anything to contribute about Archoil's impact on engine temperature?

Any information on Archoil at all?

Any information?


I would suggest that you read the thread before posting again. I've already contributed on Archoil's impact on engine temperature.

Now, which one of you is Miro?

Top
Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >